Mitt, I must yield to your experience with LSD since I have none but you cut me to the quick with your hurtful comments about my assessment of my own intelligence. “Much smarter”? Excuse me? I think you would be more accurate to say “extraordinarily smarter”. Oh, by the way, let the others in the BHO camp know that the Repuglicans don’t want to play nice and will continue to obstruct progress any way they can SO LEARN HOW TO FIGHT or get out of the way!!

As with MOST of Obama’s wins, this Wyoming win can not and does not compare with winning states like Ohio, New York, California and other states the Democratic Party WILL carry in November. Yet Obama’s camp pretends all states are equal. So naive. Also, Obama should gratefully consent to be Hillary’s VP so she can train him up and make him acceptable for the 2016 election. He’s a bright fellow so that should be enough time. Give ‘em hell Hillary !!!!

Obama scores a win - new clip of traditional native dance training tour for Samantha Power…....

Mapouka http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1SJwk87jmo&feature=related

Helping Hillary send Bill to Africa…....

Well, we’re hearing more from the silent majority of the 21st Century. Back in the old days of the 20th Century, this would simply not have happened.

Yeah, I know, I know. Obama was ‘projected’ to win in Wyoming, (and that too sort of surprised me) but still, I’m noting the change. Wyoming has always been a blood red state, as it may well remain in the general election. Still, even though this WAS the Democratic Caucus, it’s still a bit of a surprise for Wyoming’s Dems to lean to the progressive rather than the conservative (republican) side of the Democratic Party.

Now of course Hillary’s campaign had already deemed this to be unimportant contest in Wyoming, and an unimportant state. Any state that she doesn’t win is ‘unimportant’ in their eyes. (note the denial of reality).

But, if she were at all smart, or if her campaign advisors were paying the slightest bit of attention, (to reality, which is ‘we the people’) then they WOULD note that these constant wins for Obama might just be a result of the fact that more and more Americans, state by state, are REJECTING not just her policies and positions on the issues most important to them, but the trashy way in which her campaign has been conducted.

Sure in earlier times, Americans might have paid less attention to, or otherwise overlooked one or the other;the flip-flopping on positions or the trashing of her party mate, democratic team member. We saw that Americans didn’t do a whole lot about the swiftboating of John Kerry.

Still, doesn’t she ‘get’ that the ‘fooled once’ adage applies to the American constituency as well? Doesn’t she ‘get’ that after the misery of these 7 long years of a radical/reactionary regime, that Americans wouldn’t be FAR more likely to pay attention now? Don’t they get a clue from the RECORD turnouts in these 2008 primary contests? Have they attempted to connect ANY dots of reality here?

Well, ‘appearances’ at least, would suggest not.  While HRC has in fact sort of blurred/altered her ‘public/campaign’ message to conform more with the concerns of American voters, (ie the vague plans for eventually leaving Iraq – maybe, sometime, if things work out) she’s just gone totally overboard with the trashing. So much so that it’s like watching someone in the throes of a psychotic meltdown.

Now when this happens to Britney Spears, there’s the reaction from the parallel universe/alternative reality of the entertainment industry, that ranges from genuine recognition, (and empathy for her condition) to vicious attacks that demonize her further. BUT, when HRC does this kind of stuff, it makes Americans WORRIED. It’s frightening! At best, it’s uncomfortable to witness (coming from someone who wants to be the top honcho) and at worse, re-affirms our steady decline as a collective/nation.

Now Hillary had an interview with Steve at 60 minutes a couple of days ago, and she actually suggested that John McCain would be a better president than her own Democratic party team contender, Barack Obama, at least in reference to the dreaded ‘national security.’ Now on the one hand, maybe she actually does believe that, and felt nothing was at all untoward in saying it. (like, just the truth in her opinion?) But on the other hand, it will not, and has not been so well received by the public, and it would seem that any politician would recognize public perception as important. Dictators and/or fascists though, don’t CARE what the public perception is. The current administration, (if we wanna call it that) is a perfect example. Hillary is morphing closer and closer to that same ideology/position.

It doesn’t seem to have occurred to her or her advisors. Or, she/they just don’t care.