![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Clinton Backtracks on Tax ReturnsPosted on Feb 27, 2008
Under pressure during Tuesday’s debate, Hillary Clinton hinted that she might release her tax returns earlier than “once I become the nominee,” a schedule that had drawn criticism from Barack Obama and the press. But aides speaking with the media the next day retreated from that opening: “As is customary, as the Democratic nominee Sen. Clinton will release her tax information in April at tax time.” Clinton’s loan to her campaign of $5 million raised questions about where the money came from, particularly since the candidate filed a joint return with her husband, who, no longer a politician, is less transparent financially. The concern is over whether a back door to financing the campaign has been created, a fear that is perhaps less warranted given the financial difficulties of the Clinton campaign. But, as the saying goes, if you’ve got nothing to hide ... .
Previous item: Twenty Debates Later Next item: William F. Buckley Jr. Dead at 82 Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By sheila, February 28 at 12:33 am # TaxesLighten up Clinton supporters. Your anger does not help her. How much does a shoe (the one in the photo) cost? Most of us will never know. It is sort of sad to watch her squander money on her campaign and on shoes.
By Israel G, February 27 at 8:52 pm # In Response to The limit of Obama's imaginationWhile I fully appreciate and understand the long suffering of the Palestinian people, I also realize that for Barack Obama to challenge the status quo regarding the Israeli occupation and collective punishment of the Palestinians, several unlikely events must occur: 1. The general public must become educated about the issue in that their current position is predicated on soundbites that strongly suggest that Israel is a victim and must defend itself. 2. Arabs should change their political approach from suicide bombs to financing American politicians and building coalitions with other American groups. 3. Arabs should do as the Jews and hire the best American publicists to reshape their image and tell their story from their point of view. 4. They must do what Jews have done well and that is to create a formidable lobbying organization(s) to represent their political goals and objectives. American politicians respond to money before anything and the Jewish lobby has perfected this in that it owns most if not all (Republicans and Democrats). 3. Arab leaders need to push for a fair and objective US approach to this crisis rather than bombing US cities. 4. Arab Americans do not seem to be interested in the political process in this country, hence their issues are overlooked. Barack is one man, not a perfect man, and while he fully understands the plight of the Palestinian people, if he does not have a mandate from the American people to change our current policy as he does regarding pulling out of Iraq, he will not be successful. Furthermore, if he dared to even criticize Israel the political support that he enjoys as well as the general support from whites and blacks would disappear overnight and he- like Pre. Jimmy Carter - would be labeled “anti-semitic”. To place this 40 year old burden on his shoulders is the equalivalent of expecting him to get rid of racism; it’s just not realistic.
By sheila, February 28 at 12:42 am # Re: In Response to The limit of Obama'sExcellent post. Maybe he can. Let’s just hope that there is, indeed, hope.I do think that there is remarkably less racism than when I was a kid.
By Kevin James, February 27 at 3:31 pm # The limit of Obama's imaginationhttp://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2008/885/op111.htm At a time when Obama’s moral voice was most needed, the reach of his wings proved to be cautiously perforated on an AIPAC line, writes Hamid Dabashi* I HAVE BEEN a silent witness to a succession of US presidential elections for over thirty years now. I came to the United States in August 1976, the very last year of the presidency of the incumbent Republican president Jerald R. Ford, and as he and Jimmy Carter were debating each other in the lead up to November 1976 election, in which President Ford lost and President Carter succeeded him. At the time of writing this article I am yet again witness to a highly contested series of primaries for the presidential election of 2008—as on the democratic front Senators Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois have captured and divided the attention of a highly charged and massively divisive American electorate—along the thorny issues of race and gender, establishment versus progressive politics, and above all a regressive politics of the status quo and a buoyant possibility of yet another upsurge of hope for the younger generation of Americans to give political reality to their otherwise moot and mute idealism. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article