I Too have noticed the bias of the media to drool over Obama, ( the prom king), and nothing but bad press for Senator Clinton. I think it’s because bad-mouthing a women is acceptable is ok, and there is a lot more money to be made in attacking the Clintons.
Make me sick.

Aegrus:

Although I agree with you that the tax return issue is not all that important, you say, “Hillary Clinton had said she might release her tax returns earlier, but was pressed as to whether or not earlier translated into before March 4 she hinted at its possibility, if I remember right.”

No, she did not hint at that possibility.  Indeed, she said (and I’m pretty sure I’m close to the exact wording) “Well, Tim, I don’t think it can be done quite that fast.  It takes time…”  I can go back and look at the transcript for the exact wording, but it was clear she was not going to release them by the primaries.

Peace.

Seeing, that picture made me wonder if those were Hillary’s feet on those shoes, but since she often stands in that position, I suppose they are.

I noticed, that the cuffs on her pants have been turned down, in what might be an attempt to appear more relaxed and confident.

In an article the other day Maureen Dodd pointed out that Hillary has had several identites in this campaign, but I would suggest she’s also had several different husbands.

The current one seems willing to let her go, and do what ever she needs to do for herself and the country, I just hope it’s not too late.

The sexist comment is the standard-issue NOW response to Hillary’s losses. Never mind that she has been a front-runner since the beginning. Never mind she is a credit to her gender by coming this far. It’s all sexism when she loses.

Not really spin, Maani. Not completely accurate, though. During the debate on Tuesday, Hillary Clinton had said she might release her tax returns earlier, but was pressed as to whether or not earlier translated into before March 4 she hinted at its possibility, if I remember right.

It’s ambiguous as to the merit of all this, and I kind of feel the tax return discussion is a non-issue. I’m pretty freaking over these debates, actually, because we’re really running out of true issues to debate about. This is just another non-issue born out of necessity to fill up air time on television. Same thing with the Farrakhan question, and the pop quiz about the name of Putin’s successor. What a bunch of bunk.

Both campaigns are driving me nuts right now. Nothing more needs to be said, but those who are attentive to politics have to suffer through hearing the same talking points and these nuanced non-issue attacks. It’s positively ridiculous.

Hillary is getting a lot of bad press, on the other hand maybe she does not deserve good press.  Since I prefer Obama, obviously it may not bother me like you.
However your sexist comment about women in power, does her no service.

THe news media, and I use the word loosely, decided to put Obama on a pedistal and do all in it’s power to make him look good, while at the same time ripping on Hillary.

She said she might release her tax return, but that’s not good enough for so called reporters. Not much of a story there so these people have a must drum up business by over-reporting on what Hillary will do and why she might not want us looking at her tax return.

Maybe the news-media should start showing us their tax returns. That would be intersting to see what these blood suckers make, deduct, etc.

I am sick of the media and I am sick of anyone who is so itimidated by a woman in power that they feel the need to attack her at every turn.

Uh…am I missing something?

The article first says, “Hillary Clinton hinted that she might release her tax returns earlier than “once I become the nominee.”  It then quotes an aide saying, “As is customary, as the Democratic nominee Sen. Clinton will release her tax information in April at tax time.”

Correct me if I’m wrong, but April is still WELL before we will know whether she is the nominee, since the convention is not until August.

So where’s the problem?

This is exactly the kind of snarky media spin - and completely dishonest spin in this case - that those of us who support Hillary have seen time and time again.

Typical.

We all know Hillary is just like all of us, maybe she does not want us to know her middle name?  Since she may not win, it will make little difference anyway.

Today Hillary is throwing the kitchen sink at Obama and tomorrow she will be throwing the toilet, people do not want the negative politics, Rove-ing the opponents may be a thing of the past, we need to let them know this.

We have one hell of a fight ahead, have you ever seen Hillary’s toilet? Am I Rove-ing?