LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Merchandise: Mr. Fish T-shirts and Signed Prints
November 22, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Enough G-2 Talk Already

Claire Wasserman on Europe's Islamic Immigrants

YouTube Videos to Wear Captions

Freedom's Fight: Part II

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
America’s Child

America’s Child

By Susan Sherman
$11.70

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Judge Silences Whistle-Blower Site

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Feb 18, 2008
Wikileaks logo
news.bbc.co.uk

A California court has ordered Wikileaks.org, a Web site that allows users to anonymously post documents and allege corruption, to be shut down. A Swiss bank brought the case after someone using the site alleged the firm had facilitated money laundering. Wikileaks says it was “given only hours notice” of the hearing.

The Indian version of the site is still active and can be found here.


BBC:

The case was brought by lawyers working for the Swiss banking group Julius Baer. It concerned several documents posted on the site which allegedly reveal that the bank was involved with money laundering and tax evasion.

The documents were allegedly posted by Rudolf Elmer, former vice president of the bank’s Cayman Island’s operation.

A spokesperson for Julius Baer said he could not comment on the case because of “pending legal proceedings”.

The BBC understands that Julius Baer asked for the documents to be removed because they could have an impact on a separate legal case ongoing in Switzerland.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Maani, March 1, 2008 at 5:21 pm #

Victory!  The judge has reversed his decision and is re-enabling the website!

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/us/01wiki.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1204402466-tbqQVX Cn5rbfI8fVr66Ug&pagewanted=print

Peace.

Report this

By rudy, February 19, 2008 at 2:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

http://wikileaks.be/wiki/Wikileaks new adress of wikileaks

Report this

By weather, February 19, 2008 at 7:24 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The Swiss swine who got the 11th hour brown bag through to little Hilbilly Clinton as he was collecting his grip and vacating the once ‘white’ house.

Report this

By Michael Duff, February 19, 2008 at 2:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m wondering if the court actually has the expertise to enforce its order.  Courts order all kinds of things that they could not possibly effectuate without the assistance of some kind of executive power to implement the order.  I teach law and have worked for courts and have a real curiosity as to what would happen if the defendant claimed to suspend the site but then did not by creating some kind of subterfuge (like “went out of business” and then popped up again with a different title.  Frankly, I think technology is going to make it harder and harder to suppress information, even though things may appear a little dark at the moment.

Report this

By Maani, February 19, 2008 at 2:05 am #

And it just keeps getting worse…

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AMTRAK_SECURITY?SITE=VTBEN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Peace.  (ever more distant…)

Report this

By Maani, February 19, 2008 at 1:36 am #

Cyrena:

I’m totally with you on this one.  A truly frightening step in the move toward totalitarianism.

Peace.  (?)

Report this

By Alex, February 19, 2008 at 12:03 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

This changes nothing, and isn’t scary at all, because the information has hit the net and has been widely distributed.

In fact without this injunction we probably would not have heard about this leak at all.

Not mentioned in that article was a 500 mbps distributed denial of service attack sent at that site around saturday. That would be like ~3000 normal broadband connections attacking (saturating) the server continually and at once. It is unknown who launched it.

Report this

By cyrena, February 18, 2008 at 11:43 pm #

I never even knew this site existed, which is sort of a shame, now that it’s being forced down.

What’s far more frightening of course, is that a California judge has ordered it closed.

The move toward Totalitarianism just keeps marching on.

Other whistleblower protection laws have recently been compromised as well.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.