LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Dateline: Iraq - Anna Badkhen and Sarah Stillman on Assignment
 
May 16, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Truthdig Bazaar
The Terror Dream

The Terror Dream

By Susan Faludi
$17.16

Print Thumbnail

Jesus

Mr. Fish
$250

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Iraqi Official: Suicide Bombers Had Down’s Syndrome

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Feb 1, 2008
Baghdad market
AP photo / Khalid Mohammed

Cleanup crews on Friday tend to the aftermath of one of the explosions at a market in central Baghdad.

The two suicide bombers who carried out the attacks that killed 91 people in crowded Baghdad animal markets were mentally challenged women with Down’s syndrome, according to Iraqi military officials. The women reportedly had been strapped with explosives that were activated via remote control.


Times Online:

Al-Qaeda has increasingly used women as suicide bombers in recent weeks but this would be the first known case of its triggering their explosives through remote control. “We found the mobiles used to detonate the women,” Major-General Qassim Moussawi, an Iraqi military spokesman, said. He said that both women had Down’s syndrome.

The first woman was blown up in the bird section of the popular al-Ghazl pet market in central Baghdad soon after 10am, killing at least 50 people, injuring scores more and leaving the ground covered in body parts, blood and the scorched carcasses of birds.

A mobile phone rang incessantly amid the shoes, prayer beads, identity cards and other debris. Sunni fundamentalists consider the selling of pets to be haram—forbidden on religious grounds.

Read more

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: MoveOn, L.A. Times Endorse Obama

Next item: 'Push Polling' Taints Campaign in California

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By brian, February 10 at 2:34 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Or were the bombs in crates of

My letter to Time on line:

Hello Times
Ive seen your article on the market bombing in bangdad:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/artic le3287373.ece?Submitted=true

in which we learn:
‘We found the mobiles used to detonate the women,” Major-General Qassim Moussawi, an Iraqi military spokesman, said. He said that both women had Down’s syndrome. ‘

Government sources?

‘Iraqi and American officials blamed al-Qaeda, and accused the terrorist organisation of plumbing new depths of depravity. ‘

Now what wrong with this story? Well, what you dont report is this:

‘But a police official told McClatchy Newspapers that authorities were still investigating whether the explosion at the second market might have come from a bomb hidden in a cage or a box of eggs.’
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/iraq/2004159900_ iraq02.html

Youd never know that from your article! Looking at the emotional comments, i see the article has done its work.

Now to use a foreign military occupier and a Major-General Qassim Moussawi, an Iraqi military spokesman, as sources of information in what is a police matter is really dodgy journalism! Indeed, it sounds like propaganda. Why is the police story not mentioned? The McClatchy newspapers mentioned...Its there in the Seattletimes!

Downs sydrome women? Greg Mitchell has more information:
‘Iraqi officials are sticking to the Down’s syndrome claim, but McClatchy now reports: “However, Bob Lamburne, director of forensic services for the British embassy in Baghdad, cautioned that suggesting the two bombers suffered from Down syndrome based on photographs of their severed heads was ‘dangerous.’ He noted that the heads would have suffered massive trauma when the bombers’ explosives detonated. ‘The diagnosis would have to be more scientific than that,’ said Lamburne.”
http://gregmitchellwriter.blogspot.com/2008/02/print-h eadline-then-let-fact-catch-up.html

Was the reason for the ‘Downs Syndrome women that its necessary to explain why women with bomb belts wouldnt appear nervous and hysterical? the women were described as:

Iraq has death squads:
‘Iraq’s interior minister has admitted death squads and other unauthorised armed groups have been carrying out sectarian killings in the country. ‘
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4901786.stm

John Pilger has this to say:
‘This is the campaign of terror by death squads armed and trained by the US, which attack Sunnis and Shias alike. The goal is the incitement of a real civil war and the break-up of Iraq, the original war aim of Bush’s administration’
http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=175

So, who really bombed those markets? AMSI has this interesting testimony:

The former collaborator said that the Americans have a unit for “dirty jobs.” That unit is a mix of Iraqis, Americans, and foreigners and of the security detachments that are deployed in Baghdad and other Iraqi cities. This unit doesn’t only carry out assassinations, but some of them specialize in planting bombs and car bombs in neighborhoods and markets. This unit carries out operations in which wanted people whom the American army does not want killed are arrested.

The former collaborator said that “operations of planting car bombs and blowing up explosives in markets are carried out in various ways, the best-known and most famous among the US troops is placing a bomb inside cars as they are being searched at checkpoints. Another way is to put bombs in the cars during interrogations. After the desired person is summoned to one of the US bases, a bomb is place in his car and he is asked to drive to a police station or a marked for some purpose and there his car blows up.”
http://www.heyetnet.org/en/content/view/490/27/

So maybe it wasnt Downs syndrome women who unwittingly blew up those markets. But youd never know by reading the Timesonline!

regards

Reply to this | Report this

By td, February 7 at 7:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The arguments in support of suicide bombers on this blog are bizarre.

How could anyone believe that suicide bombers who intentionally kill innocents have a moral code that would draw the line at sacrificing women with down syndrome?

That slippery slope was crossed long ago.

Reply to this | Report this

By casandra, February 6 at 3:54 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

You can not belive anything from Iraq

They would not send mentally ill in with bombs. They treat the mentally ill better than the US does.

There is no lack of suicide bombers so why send someone it.  It is just more CIA propaganda.  The CIA is getting desperate.

Do you remember the “nurse” that said the Iraq Solders took babies out of incubators and put them on the floor to steal the incubators.  It was a lie.

They so called nurse was the daughter Kuwaiti ambassador in Washington another CIA lie.  Just look it up.  This attack is the same.  I am also upset that people call people with Down’s mentally ill. I have worked with them and they have more sense then Bush!

Reply to this | Report this

By Craig, February 4 at 7:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

While I agree with the basic sentiment that we should be skeptical of supposed facts that come out of this war, I have point out that I think it is very unlikely that the fact that these women had Down Syndrome is wrong..

As a father of a daughter with DS, I can tell you that it is extremely easy to determine if someone has DS based solely on their facial features.  Heck, our OB/GYN did it 10 seconds after Elise was born.  Now familiar with DS, I do it at the grocery store from a distance.  The facial features are simply obvious signs of DS.

Btw, a quick chromosonal test (for us, it took a couple days) will provide conclusive proof of whether or not there is indeed a 47th chromosone.

Reply to this | Report this

By Z, February 3 at 2:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Iraqi Official: Suicide Bombers Had Down’s Syndrome

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/articl e_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003705961

It turns out on the following day, that the evidence for the mentally disabled part was that one of the alleged bombers’ head recovered after the blast was deformed, suggesting Down’s syndrome. Now the AP and The New York Times point out that the severed head may have merely been deformed by the blast.

Also, McClatchy’s crack Baghdad bureau now reports that Iraqi officials “have made similar claims in the past” about mentally crippled bombers—and a police official told them “that authorities were still investigating whether the explosion at the second market might have come from a bomb hidden in a cage or a box of eggs.”

Reply to this | Report this

By Non Credo, February 3 at 6:12 am #
(1142 comments total)

Cyrena, you write, so diplomatically, “This article doesn’t rule that out, nor does it provide proof ...”.

Cyrena, the ONLY shred of evidence is an Iraqi government official’s assertion that the blast-damaged heads appear to have “flattened” noses — and he won’t even allow the photos to be reproduced! There is ZERO reason to believe this, given the paltry “evidence” and the history of lying by the war party, its puppet rulers in Iraq, and their corporate media propagandists, Washington “think tanks”, and Arab-hating Israel lobby “experts”.

These are the same jerks who lied us into the war and are now lying to keep us there, dragging us to war against Iran, and pushing our country into bankruptcy and ruin. This is no story at all. It could not more literally be utter crap if we had found it in a catbox.

Reply to this | Report this

By Michael Lonergan, February 3 at 3:28 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I think you folks have been reading way to many conspiracy theories.  One sure fire way to prove that these women had Down syndrome is through DNA testing of any recoverable DNA from them.  But then you wouldn’t believe the evidence then either.  It just had to be the evil American regime. Pathetic.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By lilmamzer, February 4 at 6:44 am #
(871 comments total)

Re:

It just had to be the evil American regime. Pathetic.

You forgot to mention the evil American regime acting as a puppet of its Zionist Jew masters.

We are posting at TruthCrapDig, after all.

Reply to this | Report this

By cyrena, February 3 at 3:13 am #
(4143 comments total)

From the article:

• Women suicide bombers used to be rare in Iraq, responsible for only 14 of 667 attacks since May 2005. But six have blown themselves up since November, the previous four in Diyala province north of Baghdad, where al-Qaeda is still a force.

So, how quickly we forget. The claim here that WOMEN suicide bombers ‘used to be’ rare in Iraq.  The reality is that ANY gender of suicide bombers was UNHEARD of in Iraq, prior to the US invasion of that country in 2003.

So, let us remember that there was NO al-Qaeda in Iraq before the US invasion and occupation of Iraq INVITED them there. Let us remember that the first ‘terrorists’ on the scene, were the US military, and that they remained the primary (if not sole) terrorists, for the first two years of that occupation, meeting only minimal resistance from those Iraq nationalists, who opposed the US invasion and occupation of their nation state.

Again, for the record…Iraq did NOT have bombers of any gender, age, class, or religious affiliation, prior to the US invasion and occupation. So, let us keep that in perspective. Because, if there is a ‘terrorist’ operation in the works, it’s because the US kicked it off. Terror breeds terror.

And then, there’s this:

• Ryan Crocker, the US Ambassador, said: “There is nothing they won’t do if they think it will work in creating carnage and the political fallout that comes from that.”

Surely I’m not the only one to see the irony here, and the comparison to 9/11, as it was a false flag operation. There was NOTHING the gangsters in power wouldn’t do, (including an attack against US) to create the carnage and political fallout, as well as the shredding of the constitution and the rise of fascism right here, that came from that. If it meant attacking us under false pretenses, and taking the lives of thousands of Americans, to achieve this rise of fascism here at home, (the New Pearl Harbor) than our ‘leaders’ were more than willing to arrange it.

It appears to have worked quite well right here.

Meantime, how do we know, (at least from the article) that these women were afflicted with Down Syndrome, or that they even had to be afflicted with ANYTHING, if indeed they were detonated remotely?

How do we know that somebody, -ANYBODY- didn’t just tell them to put on some jacket or vest, and go to the market?

This article doesn’t rule that out, nor does it provide proof that these women were afflicted with Down Syndrome, or anything else.

Reply to this | Report this

By brewerstroupe, February 2 at 11:14 pm #
(68 comments total)

How quickly we rise to the bait.
The evidence that the perps suffered from Down’s Syndrome was “one of the heads (recovered after the explosion) was deformed”

Semtex or TAPT let off close to your face’ll do that to ya.

The War Party propaganda scores again. Trolls will trumpet the “barbaric Islamofascists use of retarded victims” meme for years after forensic evidence proves it false. One thing is for sure, no devout Muslim would countenance such an act.

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By lilmamzer, February 4 at 6:48 am #
(871 comments total)

Re:

One thing is for sure, no devout Muslim would countenance such an act.

HA HA HA HA

You haven’t been to a typical Wahabbi mosque in the Saudi Entity or Gaza or Finsbury Park in London, have you.......

Reply to this | Report this

By GW=MCHammered, February 2 at 10:23 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Uh-huh......

And what disorder does our president have?
Books have been written.

Reply to this | Report this

By joe, February 2 at 8:31 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Why Believe this?

Why in the world would you believe this Down’s Syndrom angle considering the propaganda machine that Iraq is now?  Why would you not be extremely skeptical of this?  This is pure spin to make this act seem like some monstrous abberation.  In this world of the “surge”, a monstrous act like this needs to be saturated in fiction.  Its horrendous as it is, but making them “retarded” gives those who glance at this story in the headlines the ability to not feel so bad about it.

Reply to this | Report this

By grousefeather, February 2 at 8:11 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Who do you believe?

As Ronald Reagan would say, “There you go again, believing what you read in the media.”

I don’t believe for a minute that the women (if indeed it was women) were mentally handicapped and therefore ruthlessly exploited by the “terrorists.” Our government, and that BOGUS joke of a government in Iraq, will say anything at all to advance their goals and that includes hiring people to set off explosives and then blame the local resistance. The real terrorist reside in Washington D.C. and are lead by George Bush and it’s important to bear that in mind when evaluating the veracity of media statements coming from Iraq.

Reply to this | Report this

By Jimmy Case, February 2 at 7:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Hey, didya know Saddam threw the babies out of the incubators too?

Gimme a break, pure BS here.

Reply to this | Report this

By RAE, February 2 at 5:27 pm #
(353 comments total)

Repulsive

If true, this is the sickest, most heinous criminal act I’ve ever heard of.

I’m a committed pacifist but I would not be responsible for my actions if I ever got my hands on the monsters who sent two mentally handicapped women strapped with explosives into a crowd and then remotely blew them to bits.

I can tell you one thing… their deaths would NOT be quick or painless… although I have one qualm about my attitude… clearly, whoever did it is also mentally deficient.

I don’t know… rage is a strange emotion…

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By RAE, February 2 at 5:31 pm #
(353 comments total)

Re: Repulsive

BTW, it’s not DOWN’S SYNDROME, it’s DOWN SYNDROME… named after John Down, a British physician who described the condition in 1866.

Reply to this | Report this

By Alejandro, February 2 at 2:35 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Really! What kind of “BS” is this? If it weren’t for the loss of so many innocent lives because of the madness of this administration, I might laugh. Downs Syndrome, indeed… The crap out of this administration and there lackys keeps getting deeper and deeper every day. Sick bastards, all of them..

Reply to this | Report this

By dihey, February 2 at 1:49 pm #
(46 comments total)

Down's?

Down’s syndrome was deduced from the severed heads of the women according to my information. Is that possible?

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By Elizabeth, February 2 at 6:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Re: Down's?

Down’s syndrome has some characteristic facial features. So if they had a head they might be able to identify the syndrome.  However, given the size of the blasts, I doubt they have enough left to make any kind of identification.

Reply to this | Report this

By dick, February 2 at 1:38 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

No evidence;not credible, thus far. Most Muslim suicides are done knowingly and willingly, with many candidates. Evil passions abound, cloaked with religion.

Reply to this | Report this

By C Quil, February 2 at 1:32 pm #
(89 comments total)

This sounded like the plot from Joseph Conrad’s “The Secret Agent”. The whole thing didn’t make sense until I heard that the bombs were detonated by someone else. There was a description by a person at the market of one of the women, well known in the area, walking along holding a child by the hand. It didn’t sound like someone who was knowingly on a suicide bombing mission.

People with Down’s Syndrome, in their sweetness, tend to be very trusting of people they know. Who knows what the cowards who sent her out there with the bomb told her? Maybe they said it was for her own protection.

I had an aunt with Down’s Syndrome and I’ve cared for several others. They were some of the sweetest people I’d ever met.

Reply to this | Report this

By Non Credo, February 2 at 10:47 am #
(1142 comments total)

Another fake "fact"?

Professor Juan Cole at juancole.com expresses doubt about this story.

And it would not be the first fake “fact” to come out of the pro-war propaganda machine.

After all, if the US public learned that there are even a few Iraqi women with normal mental faculties who are so desperately determined to end the US occupation that they are willing to resort to something like this, that might severely damage the war party’s propaganda effort, aimed at convincing us that the Iraqis want us to continue our occupation forever.

It’s much better for the war party and their puppet rulers if these women can be explained away as “retards” who didn’t know what they were doing.

Reply to this | Report this

By jatihoon, February 2 at 5:30 am #
(147 comments total)

Look at the "Spinners."

And I thought, Bush and Co, has “Down Syndrome.These people are so shameless that will stop at nothing to justify there wrong policies. First it was Hussain, then islamist and now Down sysdromeist.

Reply to this | Report this

By Phil Latham, February 2 at 3:28 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Whenever I hear a story like this, one that creates this kind of instant outrage towards Al-Qaeda or Iran or any of our enemies in “the war on terror” I’m suspicious. How is it that a mere 24 hours after the attack the investigation has already reached a conclusion. Of course, the report may very well be true, but is anyone asking questions about the conclusions and how they were reached. All information coming from any branch of our government, military or the puppet government in Iraq should be examined vey thoroughly before being accepted.

Reply to this | Report this

By gennifer bartholomew, February 2 at 2:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

1/ The time reports, that the fact that bomb carriers had Down syndrom was a statement by Iraki officials (it does not mean it is not true, but it is not presented there as a proven fact)

2/ Who is most likely to want to randomly blow up people in order the keep the insecurity feeling high?

Invaders or mytholigical resistance organizations?

Robert Fisk wrote an article in the Independent more than a year ago describing how people whose mobile phone did not work survived but saw the car they had been driving blow up as they were phoning their headquarters to report that they had arrived in a crowded place.

So are there really that many suicide bombers in Irak or is it just a very useful propaganda trick?

Reply to this | Report this

By P. T., February 2 at 12:05 am #
(773 comments total)

Following that way of reasoning, why should any service member be condemned for doing what al-Qaeda does?

By the way, I live near a base and do not know anyone in the service with Down’s syndrome.

Because you oppose the war does not mean you have to support bombing markets.

Reply to this | Report this

By Michael Lonergan, February 1 at 11:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

This is one of the most ignorant statements I have ever heard!  There is a WORLD of difference between someone that cannot choose for themselves and a person that chooses to enlist in the military!  A soldier is fully aware of the risks associated with his job.  These two women were probably completely unaware of what was happening to them!  How do I know?  My daughter has Down syndrome.  Also I find you use of the term “retarded” repugnant.  Please educate yourself before you make such ill informed comments!

Reply to this | Hide 4 replies | Report this

By P. T., February 3 at 8:24 pm #
(773 comments total)

Re:

Both Down’s syndrome and Down syndrome are correct.  As does the article, my college psych book used Down’s.  So does Taber’s Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary.

Reply to this | Report this

By Gregorio, February 2 at 12:12 pm #
(24 comments total)

Re: Look again, Lonergan

My comment was that there was no difference in kind between sending people with Downes Syndrome unknowingly into a market wearing explosives, and luring uninformed young people into combat with promises of tuition, medals, and ribbons instead of candy.  You insist there is a world of difference, and then go on to claim that the soldier is FULLY AWARE of the risks associated with his job.  Not.  That is why so many of them are committing suicide or killing their spouses upon return, or turning their belligerence upon others.  Many of them say they never thought it would be the way it was.  Why don’t you educate yourself before you make such ill-informed comments?
At least the women with Downes Syndrome were not laboring under the preposterous notion that their presence was something for which others in the market were going to show gratitude.  On the other hand the American storm troopers kill with impunity and destroy homes with all the zest of a Zionist Nazi in Palestine, and then get upset that they are not greeted by people who show their appreciation.  Now that is really retarded, yet P.T. (above your post and whose first paragraph is incomprehensible), who says he lives near a military base and has never seen anyone with Downes Syndrome in uniform, thinks that those who engage in this kind of delusional thinking, are not mentally challenged.  Again, what happened at this market is no different from the institutionalization, by the Pentagon, of recruitment policies that lower educational standards so that the “fully informed of the risks” teenagers who failed to finish high school, and who feel resentful that Iraqi citizens are not welcoming them, can band together as brothers of shared experiences involving intimidation and humiliation of innocent people.  Tell me now, who is mentally challenged more?  If you think what happened was heinous, then logic and consistency suggests you also hate the Pentagon’s recruitment policies.  How many people have you talked out of recruiting?

Reply to this | Hide 2 replies | Report this

By P. T., February 3 at 8:04 pm #
(773 comments total)

Re: Re: Look again, Lonergan

If you can’t understand my comment, that is due to your swinish ignorance.  As for your defense of al-Qaeda (to wit “Why should Al-Qaeda be demonized . . . “), you also are twisted.

Report this

By Michael Lonergan, February 2 at 11:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Re: Re: Look again, Lonergan

It is amazing how your ignorance completely astounds me.  I do not know where you are getting your information about how these women were identified as having Down syndrome by their severed heads.  They were identified as having Down syndrome by others in the markets that happened to survive the blasts.  In your rush to vilify Bush, (whom I think is a total moron), do not forget that these terrorists are nothing more than brutal murderers and cowards.  They should be shown no mercy for what they have done to these two women.  This affects me because my daughter has Down syndrome, and these monsters played upon these womens’ innocence and trust.

By the way, get it through your heads that it is DOWN syndrome, NOT DOWN’S syndrome.  It was named after the doctor that identified it as a chromosomal abnormality, sometimes referred to as Trisomy 21.

Also, if you are going to make a rational argument, at least learn what the condition is called and HOW TO SPELL IT. If your recruits have not figured out by now, that war is a possibility when they sign up, and that the consequences of war are brutal, then they lack understanding.  Your use of the term “retarded” is also an insult.  No one is holding a gun to these people’s heads as they sign up.  Many enlisted because of the promise of training and an education.  If they were too blind to understand that the military might be called upon to fight a war, then that is their fault.  Do not compare someone with Down syndrome, or any other mental handicap as being on the same level as someone that has all of their faculties.  I suggest that you actually get to know someone with Down syndrome.  It will be an eye opening experience.

Report this

By Michael Lonergan, February 1 at 11:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

This just makes me sick!  My daughter has Down syndrome, and I cannot imagine what those dear women went through.  They were so innocent, and did nothing to deserve this.  They probably had no clue as to what was going on.  My heart goes out to them.  May they rest in peace.  They are in a far better place, away from all the violence and hatred.

Reply to this | Report this

By Gregorio, February 1 at 10:17 pm #
(24 comments total)

Mentally challenged? How about our guys?

This deplorable victimization of the mentally retarded does not actually differ much in kind from the lowering of standards for enlistment in the US military, or from the belief by many who do enlist that they are going to be taken care of by the US government, even get some money for schooling.  Why should Al-Qaeda be demonized for doing what every US military recruiter does?

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By P. T., February 2 at 12:07 am #
(773 comments total)

Re: Mentally challenged? How about our guys?

Following that way of reasoning, why should any service member be condemned for doing what al-Qaeda does?

By the way, I live near a base and do not know anyone in the service with Down’s syndrome.

Because you oppose the war does not mean you have to support bombing markets.

Reply to this | Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
Robert Scheer's new book offers first-hand insight into the presidential mind
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.