LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Merchandise: Mr. Fish T-shirts and Signed Prints
November 9, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Kucinich: Why I Voted No

Happy Birthday, Pat Tillman

Afghanistan's Sham Army

When Voters Disrupt the Tea Party

Rupert Murdoch vs. Google (and Reality)

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Kucinich: Why I Voted No

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Edwards Bows Out

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jan 30, 2008
Edwards
observer.com

Pledging to soldier on in his quest to fight poverty, Democratic candidate John Edwards dropped out of the presidential race Wednesday. Edwards has not yet endorsed either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.  His two former rivals both praised him Wednesday as he made his exit. 


AP via Breitbart.com:

Edwards announce his campaign was ending with his wife and three children at his side. Then he planned to work with Habitat for Humanity at the volunteer-fueled rebuilding project Musicians’ Village, his campaign said.

With that, Edwards’ campaign ended the way it began 13 months ago—with the candidate pitching in to rebuild lives in a city still ravaged by Hurricane Katrina. Edwards embraced New Orleans as a glaring symbol of what he described as a Washington that didn’t hear the cries of the downtrodden.

Edwards burst out of the starting gate with a flurry of progressive policy ideas—he was the first to offer a plan for universal health care, the first to call on Congress to pull funding for the war, and he led the charge that lobbyists have too much power in Washington and need to be reigned [sic] in.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Chrome Bag - Free Shipping

Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By MrJJ, January 31, 2008 at 1:47 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Who will speak up for the working class?

Clinton Remained Silent As Wal-Mart Fought Unions

Tapes Reviewed by ABC News Show Clinton As a Loyal Company Woman

In six years as a member of the Wal-Mart board of directors, between 1986 and 1992, Hillary Clinton remained silent as the world’s largest retailer waged a major campaign against labor unions seeking to represent store workers.

Wal-Mart’s anti-union efforts were headed by one of Clinton’s fellow board members, John Tate, a Wal-Mart executive vice president who also served on the board with Clinton for four of her six years.

Tate was fond of repeating, as he did at a managers meeting in 2004 after his retirement, what he said was his favorite phrase, “Labor unions are nothing but blood-sucking parasites living off the productive labor of people who work for a living.”

An ABC News analysis of the videotapes of at least four stockholder meetings where Clinton appeared shows she never once rose to defend the role of American labor unions.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4218509&page=1

Report this

By anonymous, January 31, 2008 at 12:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

so much for taking the fight all the way to the convention

i sure hope it’s not Elizabeth’s health

never had a bad thought about either of them but sure wish he’d have bought a Flowbee

Report this

By cyrena, January 31, 2008 at 12:46 am #

Actually,

He did have some attaction to the Corps, because he made a large part of his living by suing them, and that’s a VERY GOOD THING!!

Obama has no different connection to the Corps. He was a civil rights attorney, and did basically the same work as Edwards has done, but he just didn’t make as much money, because he wasn’t at it as long. (and, university professors don’t get rich being University professors (Obama) or state Senators (also Obama).

So, lets keep it real here. If you want the corporate lobbiest connections of which you speak..pin them on Hillary, or ANY of the repugs running, with the exception of maybe Ron Paul on the repug side.

Now, I don’t like Ron Paul at all, and I think he’s very dangerous for a lot of reasons. But, as far as I know, he put down the corps and the lobbyists a while back, when his buddy Tom DeLay was becoming super wealthy off the corruption, and ronnie wasn’t getting any of it.

So, now that Giuliani has dropped out, you have just Hillary and the repugs left to keep the corporations and the lobbyists in power. Guiliani was was probably the MOST ‘corporately connected’ crooks running on the repug ticket.

Now Hillary gets that spot, even over McCain, though none of the repugs left, are that far behind her.

If nothing else, Hillary DOES have those big corporate connections, and the repugs would be satisfied enough, if she wins. No difference at all, between her and McCain. They should be running on the same neo-con ticket.

Report this

By rawdawgbufalo, January 31, 2008 at 12:33 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I think Edwards droppin out may have one of thre outcomes.  hook, line and sinker.

Report this

By jbart, January 30, 2008 at 11:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

With it seemingly a new executive being “ushered” into a change, we (as true Americans) need to “focus” on a “legislative” vote for a truly “effective” resistance in the right direction and, with that in place, a renewed America. (please note I call it my country America,(not Amerika or Amerikka). But I understand, and accept, the attitude that causes people of thought to equate our recent (in history) penchant for “irrational” thought. Although somewhat understandable, it remains “unacceptable” to people who “care enough” to seek rational, and justifiable CHANGE.
Let’s assume that the Repugs cannot win the presidency in the next election. Based on this premise, the “Supremes”,(entirely based on the Constitution that they, invariably choose to ignore) cannot be stopped,nor affected. 
Unless the incumbents die, or want to write a book and retire, or experience an “enlightenment” and change their opinions/points of view, we cannot stop thier constitutionally dictated imposition of judicial power. That POWER comes from the document that defines our government and, basically, our lives as Americans (i.e, the Grand Plan of Democracy).
With, probably less than the usually allotted “2 cents’ I offer this opinion (but with pain-in-my heart). Let us all accept that Hillary (not my choice..given connections to Bilderbergers/Tri-latetrals/Nau-Nwo relationships/etc) may become the “only” candidate that “they” allow to compete. We, as the only true option afforded to us in this given scenario, need to “affect” the support structure. The message needs to be sent, and heard, loudly.  This is what “we” (the populace) want you to do in a situation where things don’t “really” change.  Only in “groupspeak”. We need to “vote” real people who, without the $ to “blitzkrieg” us into giving our vote to those who have “experience” in dealing with the “system”.  What we really need is naïve, inexperienced, Americans who truly care to represent our needs and desires.  Why not see the debates about “ability” in terms of caring, as opposed to “ knowing the system and how to get things done”? I’d rather have a “truthful and caring person” then one that “professes” to be part of how things get done. In my mind, this is not about Obama or Hillary….this is about us, and our children (and theirs), and the future of our country.

Report this

By Maani, January 30, 2008 at 7:54 pm #

Blackspeare:

Whoa!  The concept of Rudy Mussolini…I mean, Adolf Giuliani…I mean, Rudy Giuliani as either Sec’y of DHS or Attorney General is enough to make one want to move to Portugal (where I hear they have a friendly expat commnity…)

Peace.

Report this

By Blackspeare, January 30, 2008 at 7:16 pm #

Maani…

No doubt a position will be made available for Edwards whether he sides with any candidate before the nomination or campaigns for the nominee afterwards.  Of course if he backs a candidate now he’ll have his choice of positions should that candidate be successful; however, if not, then he’ll have to go back to chasing ambulances!

On the other hand, Guiliani is pretty sure
that McCain will win the nomination and by backing him from the getgo he will be able to name his position——probably Secretary of Homeland Security——ain’t that grand.  Hopefully, the Democratic nominee will be successful in November whoever she is!

Report this

By Patrick Story, January 30, 2008 at 6:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Edwards’ message had, unfortunately, too much reality in it. Accepting that the corporate takeover of the government has been firmly consolidated under Bush/Cheney, and would have to be fought by a determined mass movement to force change inside the beltway, would be a transformational experience for most Americans. It would require sacrifice. Not gonna happen just yet. Those of us clinging to the lower middle class, formerly known as the working class, will have to keep organizing locally and hoping that something will wake up our friends and neighbors.

Report this

By Maani, January 30, 2008 at 6:02 pm #

One thing is virtually a sure bet: Edwards will be on the short list for Attorney General - a position tailormade for him, and one in which he would excel like no other before him.

Peace.

Report this

By GB, January 30, 2008 at 5:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Corporate Media 3 - Democracy 0
How wonderful is privatization.
Thank the Republicans and Pelosi kids.

Report this

By Ellis, January 30, 2008 at 5:54 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Once again Amerikans must choose the lesser of two evils in our Presidential election. It’s time to put hippies in charge !! Vote Woodstock Nation Party !!

Report this

By Paracelsus, January 30, 2008 at 4:46 pm #

I have no regret or sense of disappointment for I was disillusioned long ago. I am amused by the obseqious shows of mourning over Edwards. You are all such contemptilble lemmings.

Report this

By Frostedflakes, January 30, 2008 at 4:37 pm #

The only candidate which surely was not attached to lobbyist or corporations. John Edwards is a good man.

Report this

By ocjim, January 30, 2008 at 4:30 pm #

American voters are hard to read sometimes. I’m not sure why more people didn’t latch onto John Edwards’ campaign message. To tell the truth, he never inspired me, but I liked his message.

You answered your own question. I also liked Edwards’ message but he didn’t inspire. I didn’t see a leadership quality. I didn’t see a passion in his eyes. I didn’t detect the drive or the intelligence needed for leadership.

Perhaps others shared these perceptions.

Report this

By Aegrus, January 30, 2008 at 4:22 pm #

American voters are hard to read sometimes. I’m not sure why more people didn’t latch onto John Edwards’ campaign message. To tell the truth, he never inspired me, but I liked his message.

His decision not to endorse a candidate is very wise. I’ve heard a couple Edwards supporters move towards Hillary Clinton. Not my candidate, but okay. Think more will go to Obama eventually because they shared a vision of change and unity for America beyond class, race and partisanship.

In a realistic aspect, John isn’t in a position to endorse anyone without serious reprise. Hopefully, he’ll play it safe like Al Gore, and keep the solidarity with the Democratic party. His message is important, and should not be tarnished by the racial or gender politics which would ensue.

Good man, Edwards. Good luck with your fight for our nation’s poor and hard-working!

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.