![]() ![]() |
|
| |
|
Dems Upstage the PrezPosted on Jan 29, 2008
Because he lacks a legacy—at least the good kind—no one expected much from President Bush’s final State of the Union address, which is probably why Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama managed to steal the spotlight. The Internet is buzzing over Monday’s sideshow. But the extra attention cuts both ways. Clinton boldly marched right up to Ted Kennedy and shook his hand, but she also got caught checking with Obama before applauding the president. Still, better mixed reviews than none at all. And the president wasn’t the only wallflower at the dance. John McCain and Mike Huckabee, though they weren’t there in person, stood with Bush in spirit, largely agreeing with what he had to say and not offering much to get excited about.
Previous item: Bush Goes Out With a Thud Next item: Lieberman Says He Won't Run With McCain Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By steve, January 29 at 2:55 pm # who caresHow exactly did the Democrats upstage the President?? By all sitting together like a bunch of cheerleaders?? The Democrats are a bunch of cowards, Obama and Hillary included, and our sorry excuse for a President is simply a puppet for who is really in charge: the heads of the Multinational Corporations. Nobody should care about all these side shows, the State of the Union address etc, the real decisions get made in the boardrooms.
By don knutsen, January 29 at 10:08 am # As discusting as it was to hear the republican cheerleaders hoot and hollar like at a monster truck rally to such a despicable administration. It was probably more disheartening to see Obama leap to his feet when the chimp-in-chief announced that we would defend ( read: attack whomever we choose ) our vital security interests ( their oil ). Was D. Kucinich shown, undoubtedly not, he could never get the attention from the propoganda machine that is our media, yet he was the best hope of making a 180 degree change in our country’s direction and understood far better then Pelosi or Reid that impeachment of both Cheney & Bush should be the No. 1 priority of the Congress. Why do the democrats still play the role of the dutiful whimps? As if this president deserves the favor of any credibility, on anything ? They all sat there, cheered at the cue cards given while knowing full well that if George Bush’s lips are moving, then he is lying.
By T Mack, January 29 at 9:19 am # I'm not a democrat anymore...but I’m not a Republican either. Far from that. How can I feel so alienated from political people I once fervently supported? Why am I in disagreement with them most of the time? Why are the dems continuing to fund this war? No wonder we are going broke. Why do they insist on encouraging an illegal immigrant population when the resources for citizens are daily maxxed out? Has adding 50 million illegals to the country’s rolls (since they want families to come here) over the next 5 years had an impact on the degree to which we can get health care coverage and other benefits? Why didn’t they push for a single-payer universal health care? Why are they so conservative?
By Sharon Ash, January 29 at 8:34 am # What we are seeing...What we are seeing is those who want to be able to exert their influence, attaching them self to those they hope can win. Obama will attract much more of that element because, due to his lack of experience, just like George W. Bush, he will have to rely on others to a large extent. Hillary, on the other hand, is more than capable of making important decisions and will make them based upon the ‘common good’ as that has been her record. She is far less likely to require the help of Ted Kennedy on any decision than is Obama. Ted, like most politicians, is looking out for himself, not you and me. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article