![]() |
![]() |
||
|
The Man Who Lost $7.2 BillionPosted on Jan 25, 2008
How did a 31-year-old low-level bank trader with limited access lose five times as much money as the worst rogue trader ever? That’s the question European authorities and Societe Generale, France’s second-largest bank, are trying to answer.
Advertisement Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Stephen Smoliar, January 30, 2008 at 11:09 pm #
I believe investigations by the FBI have gotten under way, so you may get your wish!
Report thisBy Andy_James, January 30, 2008 at 10:13 pm #
This guy has nothing on those criminals running the lending banks behind the mortgage crisis.
How come we don’t view those executives as equal criminals?
Report thisBy amunaor, January 28, 2008 at 3:12 pm #
nrobi, you are absolutely correct in your analysis.
Are we to assume the CEOs, sitting atop of these towering egos, had absolutely NO idea of what mechanisms were in play, flowing into and filling up their bathtubs?
Do not think for a moment these folks werent hatching a psychological escape plan, for public consumption, as they scrutinized the collapse of Enron, which, by the way, appears to have been one of the biggest drug money, laundry tools to have seen the light of day.
Now that someone has tripped over bathtubs plug, and whoooosh, billions flushed down the drain, theyre all weeping crocodile tears, madly flailing their arms before the corporate lens, wondering what the hell happened; and out comes their bogus flow chart of plausible deniability.
Peace, Best Wishes and Hope
Report thisBy nrobi, January 27, 2008 at 8:38 pm #
What a great mind this man has! Even though a “low-level” employee, he singlehandedly lost 7.2 billion dollars in bank money. Then after the bank fires him, he set a scheme to help the bank liquidate the assets needed, and hedge the bank against any more losses. He should not have been fired but made the president of the European Central Bank for figuring out a way to protect the bank from the losses he created in the first place.
Report thisBy Novista, January 27, 2008 at 4:41 am #
The Fed had their all-night meeting and not a single Bloomberg terminal anywhere in sight. Uh huh, now about that bridge ...
According to the news yesterday, Jerome was down only 2.2 billion when SG recovered from the coma. So it took them 3 days of closing positions to lose a lot more.
Report thisBy C Quil, January 26, 2008 at 8:47 pm #
Apparently he had access to about ten times more money than he lost, which was about six or seven times the amount of money the bank had control of.
They have custody of him now.
Instead of locking him up, they should hire him to beef up the bank’s security systems.
Report thisBy amunaor, January 26, 2008 at 4:10 pm #
Remember the Martha Stewart ‘Camp Cupcake’ production; Michael Milken, the fiend of junk bonds?
Well, this is simply another episode devised by the corporate oligarch’s, public relations firms, meant to steer focus away from Johnny - over there - with is finger in the dike, massively fissured, ready to blow.
Peace, Best Wishes and Hope
Report thisBy weather, January 26, 2008 at 2:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
exactly - Patrick Henry, you don’t miss a beat.
Report thisBy amunaor, January 26, 2008 at 1:41 pm #
When ever you see a crowd gather, look the other way to see what the real cause for it is.
Peace, Best Wishes and Hope
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, January 26, 2008 at 12:06 pm #
He has proven he can follow in the footsteps of Dov.
He is young but given time can loose a couple of trillion.
Report thisBy Stephen Smoliar, January 25, 2008 at 10:47 pm #
I decided that my Chutzpah of the Week award should not go to Kerviel but to Jean-Pierre Mustier, head of the bank, for his response to the crisis; details at:
http://therehearsalstudio.blogspot.com/2008/01/bankers-chutzpah.html
Report this