![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
AT&T, Microsoft Discuss Internet FilteringPosted on Jan 9, 2008
During a panel discussion at the annual consumer electronics show, representatives from NBC, Microsoft and AT&T made the case for filtering Internet content at the service provider level. The idea is to stop the movement of copyrighted material, but there is a large, scary implication: allowing the pipe owner to control what passes through.
Previous item: Pakistan's Dangerous Path Next item: Rather's $70M Suit Still On Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By rage, January 10 at 2:26 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
These fascists control enough of what we see and hear. It’s not enough that they get to make all the money without competition. They have to ruin our lives too.
The real motive is their government approved surveillance of the domestic citizen, illegal warrantless invasion of our privacy, and illegal censorship of my entertainment preferences, two crimes for which ATT has developed a real talent. Now they’re rubbing wood with Microsoft and NBC to burn out the internet while hosing us consumers. This is actually an election issue all these shills and ringers who are clammoring for my vote ought to be including in their stump speeches. The airwaves belong to us, WE THE SICK AND TIRED OF THE BULL$HIT PEOPLE! But, the media propagandists sure as hell are not about to cover this on the nightly news. And, these ambitious greedy career politicians pimping us for the vote have already received their marching orders from the corporatocracy owned political parties hoping to inhabit 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue January 20, 2009 after the Dumya fumagation November 2008. They’re all in this mess together against us. I hate all these wretches.
Kucinich - Richardson 2008! For election reform, the return of Taft-Hartley, and a repeal of the Patriot Acts!
Report thisBy purplewolf, January 10 at 10:44 am #
Ironic isn’t it, that you can tape a movie off the TV and nothing is said, but rent a movie and you get all this copyright crap.DUH! Like the trash one sets to the curb, according to the police, is no longer your property it becomes public property. Radio and TV signals that once it has left their equipment is no longer the property of that company,it is up for grabs.
Rowdy, Seems that greed rules everything or tries to now.
As to the filtering of the Internet and the phones that are already being done in the false name of security, it is about time that all these big corps start to pay us for entertainment, as that is how I feel about them listening to the phone conversations people have and reading the emails that are send and now wanting to hack into our computer packages to see what is going on or not going on. If they have that much money to waste, then by all means send every person who these companies rip off each month a 95% refund for the stealing of their customers information. Why should be pay for their spying also as we all know this will raise the rates of these services? more.
As for censorship or filtering-whose decision is going to be used, some right wing Christian Conservative who is closed minded and very narrow in their thinking and views of the world and tries to force their views on everyone else, sort of similar to what is happening right now in the political-religious screwed up mess we see now. What one person finds offensive and should be filtered, another person make not be bothered by it or what I may want to research may go against someones religious beliefs and they may be offended by it, but to filter information and only allow what some feel if proper for the masses is wrong and regressive to everything from scientific discoveries, medical information, education and other things that should be kept open for all. If some people don’t like it, they don’t need to look or else change the channel so to say.
If these artists don’t want people copying their music then maybe they should find another line of work, something where what they do cannot be copied. By making this their choice of work, the sharing of their product was/is the end goal isn’t it?
Report thisBy Taz, January 10 at 4:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
you said fuck...fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
Report thisBy rowdy, January 10 at 12:10 am #
i just spent the past 2 hours watching season 3 of “futurama"[ free from the library,although someone before me mixed up the disc’s so i had 2 copies of the same disc]; matt groening did a good job of mocking the mpaa in the opening and he did well in mocking the fbi warning by showing it in an incomprehensible alien language. michael moore recently said he is not concerned about piracy of his movies and he objects to current copyright laws. “prince” recently gave away his current music[not a prince fan,couldn’t care less.] and then announced that he would vigorously prosecute anyone sharing his music. what the fuck is that about? i always knew that little fucker was crazy.
Report thisBy Outraged, January 9 at 10:19 pm #
rowdy, I’m with you on that and I’ll add it doesn’t seem to bother them to fuck writers or in Microsoft’s case fuck their programmers and for that matter fuck the consumer who buys their inferior proprietary products or fuck emerging singers/songwriters or fuck small business or fuck the cell phone user or fuck anyone and everyone even remotely connected to the fraud they call a business enterprise.
Not to worry though cause of course their only going to “FILTER” the internet. WTF is that code for.......?
Report thisBy rowdy, January 9 at 10:03 pm #
i forgot to add; fuck microsoft and at&t;. what the fuck,add comcast and aol to the fuck you list too.
Report thisBy rowdy, January 9 at 9:43 pm #
when i watch a dvd,especially when it has a “sony” label, i think about the only good thing about tape,you could fast forward thru the FBI warning[ dark helmet;” spaceballs” “uh oh fbi warning, prepare for fast forward mode”. it sucks that most dvd’s won’t jump past this shit,but sony is the worst shoving this shit in 2 languages. last week the record producers said that it is illegal for you to copy a disc you paid for. 45 years ago when i actually listened to the radio,i had a reel to reel tape recorder and i recorded songs i liked. i guess most people didn’t have tape recorders or the record industry hadn’t heard of them because you never heard a word about how the “artists” were being stolen from. a few years later when cassettes were commonplace and everyone was copying their vinyl to tape to use in their cars or give to their friend’s,still not a peep from the music industry. the beatles,the rolling stones,the doors, they didn’t look like they were living in poverty and they never complained that their music was being stolen. if the movie and recording industry are losing money it has more to do with their business model than it does with theft. mostly it has to do with their greed. it is interesting that the publishing industry doesn’t worry about people reading magazines free online,whole books are free online.hot new books can be purchased online for a fraction of their printed form. fuck the recording industry and fuck the MPAA.
Report this