![]() |
|
||
|
Clinton, McCain Win New HampshirePosted on Jan 8, 2008
“I found my own voice,” Hillary Clinton said in her New Hampshire victory speech, admitting to more than just a bumpy campaign. Instead, she appeared to be pointing at the stilted rhetoric and focus-grouping that have plagued her run for president. With Iowa and New Hampshire behind her, the senator’s campaign promise, it seems, is to speak from the heart. Both Clinton and Sen. John McCain, who won handily on the Republican side, described their victories as comebacks. With Iowa winner Mike Huckabee coming in third, and Mitt Romney still unable to break out of second place, the Republicans’ race for the White House looks as up for grabs as the Democrats’. If the Clinton machine indeed has righted itself, it has done so only with negative attacks, a tactic that Romney used with little success. Obama’s hope hype still has legs, and he’s likely to do well in South Carolina, the next contest. And let’s not forget John Edwards, who probably won’t win and will have to send his support one way or the other. Considering his many harsh words for Clinton, it’s not so difficult to guess what direction he will look. Whatever voice she uses, Hillary Clinton proved tonight that she is no pushover.
Advertisement Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Ribbie, January 9, 2008 at 6:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
You morons who keep saying that you will bypass the Democratic candidate for president in favor of a third party choice (Nader, Bloomberg et al)did just that in 2000 and gave us Bush over Gore. How’s that decision looking to you now?
Report thisBy P. Fitz, January 9, 2008 at 6:08 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Of allll the photos you could chose from as the piece for Hillarys win - you chose one that is not the most flattering. My question is WHY? I am most certain you have access to more images than just this? Are you showing your true colors? - not so veiled preferences or overt dislike? I didn’t realize you had a preference - however, if you do -it would be nice to be up-front and grown-up about it.
Keep trying - P.
Report thisBy ocjim, January 9, 2008 at 5:31 pm #
John “100 Years in Iraq” McCain and Hillary “I want to display testosterone on the war” Clinton win in NH. Don’t polls show that overall 75% of Americans want out of Iraq.
No wonder politicians ignore the will of the people. They think the people are too fickle, thoughtless,or self-indulged (or all three) to have steadfast, principled opinions.
Report thisBy ocjim, January 9, 2008 at 5:18 pm #
Media hype is so fickle and so spectacle-bound. The night before, she was finished. Hillary won by three percentage points and got less than 30% of the total vote. That is not victory. That is a temporary choice of a miniscule portion of our population.
Hopefully people will not let the media choose their candidates and their winners. They do not have the good of the country in mind. But neither does the current crop of politicians with the backdrop of political contributions to consider.
Report thisBy Sharon Ash, January 9, 2008 at 1:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
N.H. showed they are a state where moderate thought resides. Clinton does not have appeal to either the right or left extremes. But, for those who understand we need a capable captain to steady our ship during these times, she has great appeal because she gives the confidence to steer us to more calm waters. John McCain, in his own way, also gives a sense of confidence in his ability to steer the country in a better direction. We are in very turbulent waters as a country, sharp turns to the right or left, are not what we need. We need someone to steady the ship and move us to calm waters. We must have change, but we must be careful as we proceed.
Report thisBy Louise, January 9, 2008 at 12:29 pm #
You forgot one:
McCain = more of the same, only for a hundred years!
So, which country will we ask to finance GWOT when China says enough already?
Report thisBy Conservative Yankee, January 9, 2008 at 11:00 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Manchester, New Hampshire’s largest city was only 35,000 people when I landed there in 1970. John Adams (now city) Hall was the town’s tallest building with 5 floors. The city’s chief employer was the Amoskeag textile mills, and French was the town’s dominant language.
That Manchester of working people would have voted for “none of the above”
The Manchester of today has New England’s second largest airport (after Logan) and vying for largest. Elm Street is lined with skyscraper banks, and the town’s largest employer is the State of Massachusetts.
Machine politics once reviled in New Hampshire is now ensconced… Maybe the folks calling for a “national primary day” are correct.
If we can’t do better that the currently leading candidates, we will leave our children a United States far poorer (in every sense of that word) than the one we inherited.
Thank goodness I won’t be around to see it.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, January 9, 2008 at 9:13 am #
Sour Grapes!
That’s what all these posters are saying. On the GOP side I would like to see Romney’s campaign buried—he’s another George W. Bush without the need for a speech pathologist. I’d also like to see the Christian Huckster buried in the back of the pack, too.
Notice that most of the sour grape posters here are big fans of Dennis “The Menace” Kucinich, who barely got 2000 votes yesterday.
Obama will make a FINE Vice-President!
Report thisBy Jaded Prole, January 9, 2008 at 9:06 am #
A Hillary Clinton vs McCain, Huckleberry or Romney race will open the gates to alternative candidates from Nader to Bloomberg. I know I would not vote for either of the corporate party Hacks.
“Change” is not something that can be plausibly marketed by those who represent its opposite.
Report thisBy Douglas Chalmers, January 9, 2008 at 4:27 am #
Well, I guess they managed to work out the equation “woman = change” to be at least as progressive as “black = change” in New Hampshire.
Then they also must have managed to add social welfare and no more wars and deduct lack of direction and lack of policies to/from the appropriate candidates.
Report thisBy KYJurisDoctor, January 9, 2008 at 3:53 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Fred Thompson needs to REALLY get going or “it’s curtains” for him!
http://osi-speaks.blogspot.com/2008/01/hillary-clinton-spoils-my-perfect.html#links
Report thisBy GW=MCHammered, January 9, 2008 at 3:19 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Very Illuminati-ng.
Report thisExpat, Got space?
By P. T., January 9, 2008 at 3:07 am #
The recent media spin that we are winning the Iraq War is working.
Report this