LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 13, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Occupy Draws Strength From the Powerless

White Nationalists Share Spotlight With GOP at CPAC

More About the Man Bankrolling Santorum

A 'Queer History' of Rick Santorum and Proposition 8

Contraception and the Cost of Culture Wars

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Clinton, McCain Win New Hampshire

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Jan 8, 2008
Hillary Clinton
AP photo / Jim Cole

Supporters cheer as Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton takes the stage after winning in New Hampshire.

“I found my own voice,” Hillary Clinton said in her New Hampshire victory speech, admitting to more than just a bumpy campaign.  Instead, she appeared to be pointing at the stilted rhetoric and focus-grouping that have plagued her run for president. With Iowa and New Hampshire behind her, the senator’s campaign promise, it seems, is to speak from the heart.

Both Clinton and Sen. John McCain, who won handily on the Republican side, described their victories as comebacks. With Iowa winner Mike Huckabee coming in third, and Mitt Romney still unable to break out of second place, the Republicans’ race for the White House looks as up for grabs as the Democrats’.

If the Clinton machine indeed has righted itself, it has done so only with negative attacks, a tactic that Romney used with little success. Obama’s hope hype still has legs, and he’s likely to do well in South Carolina, the next contest.

And let’s not forget John Edwards, who probably won’t win and will have to send his support one way or the other. Considering his many harsh words for Clinton, it’s not so difficult to guess what direction he will look.

Whatever voice she uses, Hillary Clinton proved tonight that she is no pushover.


Time:

And beyond all that, the groundswell under the wave, is a hunger for something new. In interviews and focus groups all over the state, voters—especially Democrats—expressed this appetite. “It’s not about change,” said pollster Frank Luntz. “It’s about a new beginning. Democrats want to wipe the slate clean.”

That’s not what Hillary Clinton had hoped to hear 16 years after her now snowy-haired husband survived a wild ride in New Hampshire on his way to the presidency. As Obama began to look unstoppable, dreams of a Clinton restoration gave way to frantic rumors and desperate strategy sessions. Political operatives and journalists traded hints of staff shake-ups, insider infighting and hail-Mary gambles to somehow stem the Obama tide.

As the ballot-counting began, however, it was clear that Clinton’s well-organized New Hampshire machine was not going to collapse without a fight. Early returns showed her running strong in Manchester, the state’s largest city. Indeed, the tighter-than-expected race underlined an overlooked fact of the Iowa caucus: Clinton didn’t do badly there. She and former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards ran up what would have been record tallies in any previous year while finishing in a near-tie. It’s just that Obama shattered all records.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Ribbie, January 9, 2008 at 1:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

You morons who keep saying that you will bypass the Democratic candidate for president in favor of a third party choice (Nader, Bloomberg et al)did just that in 2000 and gave us Bush over Gore.  How’s that decision looking to you now?

Report this

By P. Fitz, January 9, 2008 at 1:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Of allll the photos you could chose from as the piece for Hillarys win - you chose one that is not the most flattering.  My question is WHY?  I am most certain you have access to more images than just this?  Are you showing your true colors? - not so veiled preferences or overt dislike?  I didn’t realize you had a preference - however, if you do -it would be nice to be up-front and grown-up about it.

  Keep trying - P.

Report this

By ocjim, January 9, 2008 at 12:31 pm Link to this comment

John “100 Years in Iraq” McCain and Hillary “I want to display testosterone on the war” Clinton win in NH. Don’t polls show that overall 75% of Americans want out of Iraq.

No wonder politicians ignore the will of the people. They think the people are too fickle, thoughtless,or self-indulged (or all three) to have steadfast, principled opinions.

Report this

By ocjim, January 9, 2008 at 12:18 pm Link to this comment

Media hype is so fickle and so spectacle-bound. The night before, she was finished. Hillary won by three percentage points and got less than 30% of the total vote. That is not victory. That is a temporary choice of a miniscule portion of our population.

Hopefully people will not let the media choose their candidates and their winners. They do not have the good of the country in mind. But neither does the current crop of politicians with the backdrop of political contributions to consider.

Report this

By Sharon Ash, January 9, 2008 at 8:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

N.H. showed they are a state where moderate thought resides.  Clinton does not have appeal to either the right or left extremes.  But, for those who understand we need a capable captain to steady our ship during these times, she has great appeal because she gives the confidence to steer us to more calm waters. John McCain, in his own way, also gives a sense of confidence in his ability to steer the country in a better direction.  We are in very turbulent waters as a country, sharp turns to the right or left, are not what we need.  We need someone to steady the ship and move us to calm waters.  We must have change, but we must be careful as we proceed.

Report this

By Louise, January 9, 2008 at 7:29 am Link to this comment

You forgot one:

McCain = more of the same, only for a hundred years!

So, which country will we ask to finance GWOT when China says enough already?

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, January 9, 2008 at 6:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Manchester, New Hampshire’s largest city was only 35,000 people when I landed there in 1970. John Adams (now city) Hall was the town’s tallest building with 5 floors.  The city’s chief employer was the Amoskeag textile mills, and French was the town’s dominant language.

That Manchester of working people would have voted for “none of the above”

The Manchester of today has New England’s second largest airport (after Logan) and vying for largest. Elm Street is lined with skyscraper banks, and the town’s largest employer is the State of Massachusetts.

Machine politics once reviled in New Hampshire is now ensconced…  Maybe the folks calling for a “national primary day” are correct.

If we can’t do better that the currently leading candidates, we will leave our children a United States far poorer (in every sense of that word) than the one we inherited.

Thank goodness I won’t be around to see it.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, January 9, 2008 at 4:13 am Link to this comment

Sour Grapes!

That’s what all these posters are saying. On the GOP side I would like to see Romney’s campaign buried—he’s another George W. Bush without the need for a speech pathologist. I’d also like to see the Christian Huckster buried in the back of the pack, too.

Notice that most of the sour grape posters here are big fans of Dennis “The Menace” Kucinich, who barely got 2000 votes yesterday.

Obama will make a FINE Vice-President!

Report this

By Jaded Prole, January 9, 2008 at 4:06 am Link to this comment

A Hillary Clinton vs McCain, Huckleberry or Romney race will open the gates to alternative candidates from Nader to Bloomberg. I know I would not vote for either of the corporate party Hacks.

“Change” is not something that can be plausibly marketed by those who represent its opposite.

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, January 8, 2008 at 11:27 pm Link to this comment

Well, I guess they managed to work out the equation “woman = change” to be at least as progressive as “black = change” in New Hampshire.

Then they also must have managed to add social welfare and no more wars and deduct lack of direction and lack of policies to/from the appropriate candidates.

Report this

By KYJurisDoctor, January 8, 2008 at 10:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Fred Thompson needs to REALLY get going or “it’s curtains” for him!

http://osi-speaks.blogspot.com/2008/01/hillary-clinton-spoils-my-perfect.html#links

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, January 8, 2008 at 10:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Very Illuminati-ng.
Expat, Got space?

Report this

By P. T., January 8, 2008 at 10:07 pm Link to this comment

The recent media spin that we are winning the Iraq War is working.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.