![]() ![]() |
|
| |
|
Bush Still Hawkish on Iran Despite Nuke ReportPosted on Dec 4, 2007A day after the release of the National Intelligence Estimate assessment on Iran’s purportedly halted nuclear weapons program, President Bush once again demonstrated his well-practiced ability to repurpose facts or opinions to better serve his administration’s aims. Remarkably, Bush was able to turn the NIE assessment, which indicated that there is substantial evidence that the Iranian government responded to international pressure and at least hit the pause button on developing nukes in 2003, into an affirmation that his own assessment of Iran’s intentions is still on target and military action against Iran is still a possibility. Although the NIE report resulted from years of surveillance by several key agencies within the U.S. intelligence community, Bush assumed a skeptical stance during a press conference Tuesday, suddenly all too eager to dismiss data from the same kind of sources that he relied on so heavily in his push to invade Iraq in 2003. Insisting that Iran won’t develop the capacity to make nuclear bombs while he’s in office—invoking the familiar presidential refrain of ”not on my watch”—Bush managed, in a particularly nimble display of rhetorical gymnastics, to deflect blame for the WMD debacle and implicate the intel community as the main culprit. “Right after the failure of intelligence in Iraq, we reformed the intelligence community,” he asserted.
Previous item: Poll: Clinton and Giuliani Are Slipping Next item: 9 Dead in Shooting at Omaha Mall Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By themask, December 5, 2007 at 8:19 am # To: 1dree5 I've got to askTo: 1dree5
By Jim Yell, December 5, 2007 at 7:33 am # Now we all know thatNow we all know that Bush avoided Vietnam & Cheney said right up front he had better things to do than join the US Army. Neither one of them appear to have refused service in disgust with the un-necessary nature of Vietnam. Now that they are too old to serve they have become the apparent spokes person for people who did serve and sadly seem to have come away with the idea that the time they spent was well used and the killing was so much fun that they are ready to kill some more following an Administration that is largely lead by people who have no respect for the truth, for the constitution, for their own character. Yes, there are times war can not be avoided, but in the past 100 years the only War that could not have been avoided was WWII, winning (?) it doesn’t seem to have imparted much judgement or sense to our supposed leaders, or to their followers. It was understood 200 years ago that War was not something to be played with, that real reasons and discussion should be made before embarking on this activity, all things that were not done leading up to Iraq and now Iran. So who is luny and danergous in all this?
By Jeff Shubert, December 4, 2007 at 9:59 pm # Bush’s response to this wasBush’s response to this was that he wouldn’t take off the table a preemptive military action against Iran. When did it get onto the table in the first place?! This guy’s first reaction to everything is to go to war. He does what he wants and could care less about facts or consequences. He acts in direct opposition to the will of the American People. He really must think it doesn’t matter what the People think. Only those who are not intelligent would disregard intelligence reports. If you point to the intelligence reports on Iraq, check your facts first before you base your argument on that. If you still support Bush now, you’re in a minority analogous to those who supported Nixon when he resigned from office in disgrace. Having nothing left but a legacy of shame, he must think he has nothing to lose by acting like a crazy dictator. WE THE PEOPLE deserve better than this! May God save the United States of America.
By susan, December 4, 2007 at 9:21 pm # Dera editor, Why not post atDera editor, Why not post at least one opposing opinion up FOR EVERYONE to see?? It is still America. Post one. The press should not be about popularity, but the freedom, correct? Be crazy! On the main page. Put up a difference of opinion. Scared to actually post something to the right? Come on! Be BOLD!!
By S. Read, December 4, 2007 at 9:00 pm # The Menace that is KingThe Menace that is King George Bush is a menace to the entire planet. How the American electorate could have possibly elected this imbecile is beyond comprehension. Let see: 1. Bush lied to the world about the Iraq War I could go on but it is too depressing The United States has always stood as a beacon of freedom and liberty for the entire world. It was a country that the world looked up to and admired. In 7 years, Bush has reduced the United States of America to a country that is reviled thoughout the world. The economy is in shambles, the currency is hitting all time lows, millions of people will be losing their homes due to sub prime fiasco and there is a real chance that a recession will be coming. As President, Bush has failed the country, the american people and the world. Instead of showing leadership that is becoming of a superpower, he has shown an uncanny ability to bully his friends and bomb his enemies. Here is hoping that the American Electorate will use their power at the ballot box to effect real change in the next election. God Bless America
By Susan, December 4, 2007 at 7:15 pm # In retrospect, I can seeIn retrospect, I can see the hesitance to trust Iran. The Iranian leader (not per say the Iranian people), has some twisted notions of how to run a country. He stated, during his visit to the U.S., his firm opinion on how “HE” views the Iranian people as a whole. He feels Iran does not have gays, women enjoy how they are treated, and he does not and will not ever respect the U.S. Clearly, he is not a man for the better good of his people. No, that does not mean they in the midst of attempting to create the demise of Americans or those that support us. After 9/11, I’m supportive of the notion to be cautious though. Bush is doing the same thing any president would do, regardless of those who oppose his “thoughts”. Times of war are sad, but I do not think Americans should become so emotionally charged that they lose sight that there may be threats against us that we really would rather choose to just have go away. Just a thought.
By DennisD, December 4, 2007 at 7:11 pm # Beam me up Scotty, I'veBeam me up Scotty, I’ve seen enough. Hurry - my phasers stuck on spin. Never let the truth get in the way of a bullshit story.
By Bryan Mitchell, December 4, 2007 at 7:01 pm # This was in an articleThis was in an article I just read on CNN which was defaming bush. But read between the lines. But in a report released Monday, U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that Iran had suspended nuclear weapons work in 2003 and was unlikely to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb until at least 2010. It looks to me like people are trying to twist this to read it the way they want to. Sure the “weapons work” was stopped in 2003 but by 2010 they will have enough enriched uranium to make a bomb. That is only TWO years away. Do you really think that just because the program making the uranium is for dmoestic purposes that the uranum couldn’t be used for a weapon, again only two years from now. Bush isn’t changing his mind because this report isn’t new information!
By Margaret from Portland, Oregon, December 4, 2007 at 6:38 pm # The Shrub is lacking brainThe Shrub is lacking brain cells. I say Impeach Bush/Chaney before we are in a third war, did not win the first went to the second had the surge and not much has changed, so why not go to a third war. Military governments lead to a dictatorship what better way to have a dictatorship than a military government. Be afraid, be very afraid. This administration is getting scarier by the day, even by the hour.
By Trigger finger, December 4, 2007 at 5:16 pm # A thought crosses my mindA thought crosses my mind as I read this post and looked at the picture of this man that during the debates of the next few months, we should ask each aspiring presidential hopeful to read aloud a paragraph from “Dick and Jane take Spot for a walk” and then explain aloud in his own words (without looking at the pictures) the meaning of the paragraph. If they stumble, take that person off the ballot. That might save us another embarrassment like this.
By Kevin James, December 4, 2007 at 5:05 pm # http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1690696,00.html?xid=rss-worldhttp://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,16906 96,00.html?xid=rss-world Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article