LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.  
 
July 25, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports
 * NEW! * Six Little Words

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Nikki Keddie on Iran

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Truthdig Bazaar
Bad Samaritans

Bad Samaritans

Ha-Joon Chang
$17.79

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

DNA Could Exonerate ‘Satanic Murderers’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Nov 4, 2007

Fifteen years ago, the “West Memphis Three” were convicted of the torture and murder of three Cub Scouts in Arkansas. New DNA evidence has bolstered the argument, laid out in two HBO documentaries and an upcoming movie, that the three teenagers convicted—one of whom was sentenced to death—were victims themselves of a community more concerned with their taste in music than evidence.

Observer via the Guardian:

Now lawyers for Echols have lodged new evidence seeking to prove his innocence. The case against the West Memphis Three appears to have been more about rushed police work and hyped-up paranoia over non-existent Satanism than evidence. The suspects were just unfortunate to be social outcasts and to like rock music.

First there was Misskelley’s confession. Despite coaching by investigators, Misskelley - who was mentally retarded and had a drug problem - described the murders incorrectly. He described sexual abuse that forensics proved had not happened. He said the murders were in the morning, when the victims were in school, and that they were tied with ropes, not shoelaces. Much of his confession seemed to be suggested by police interrogators.

The prosecution’s assertion that a Satanic ritual had taken place has also now been discredited. The key expert witness on cults, Dale Griffis, had claimed in court that the marks on the bodies were clearly Satanic. However, it was later proved that Griffis had got his ‘PhD in cult studies’ from a fake Californian university that was later closed for being a ‘diploma mill’. ‘Apart from being a travesty of justice, this is not a Satanic murder. There is no ritual,’ said John Douglas, a veteran of the FBI who is working with the defence team.

Read more

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: White House, Musharraf at Odds Over Emergency Rule

Next item: Pakistan Crackdown Intensifies

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Douglas Chalmers, November 8, 2007 at 4:27 am #

What is a “satanic ritual” these days anyway?

The US Congress sending your sons and daughters off to murder and be murdered?

The daily orthodox Christian church ritual of eating “the body and blood of Christ”?

The lies and distortions of the world’s and America’s politicians?

Report this

By purplewolf, November 8, 2007 at 1:59 am #

Another example of how the religious right has dumbed down the sheeple to see SATANISM everywhere. This investigation was rushed to judgement on the decision of mob rule mentality and frenzy. Nothing else as long as it quieted the morons.

This is what happens when you continue to dumb down the masses, logic, reason, and any common sense people once had learned are now replaced with ignorance and superstition.

Welcome to the dark ages volume II.

Report this

By Margaret Currey, November 5, 2007 at 1:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The police should not be so quick to try to get a confession especially if one is mentally chalalnged.

If a group is convicted and they did not do the crime than the criminal or criminals are still at large and probably will kill again.

Report this

By thomas billis, November 5, 2007 at 12:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

There should be no speedier process than rectifying a an error that results in incarceration.There are two good reasons 1}an innocent man should not spend one more second in jail.2}if the people convicted of the crime are innocent then a murderer or murderers are at large.I propose for as long as the D.A. tyakes to examine the eveidence and make his determination one of his loved ones must be incarcerated.I would suggest the D.A. himself but that might slow down the investigation.Let us see how quickly they come to a determination.Let us see how quickly they can sort through the evidence.

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, November 4, 2007 at 10:31 pm #

Ultimately, it gets down to “belief”......

Report this

By mary, November 4, 2007 at 3:18 pm #

We should not be seeing this type of sloppy police work in this day and age.  With so many government agencies in very bad shape, how and when will we ever be able to ‘fix’ our justice system.  I’m afraid these things will continue for a long time and it’s sad.....

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.