![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Court Victory for DIY Porn EnthusiastsPosted on Oct 24, 2007
There’s been a slight shift in the regulation of pornography in America, thanks to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, that might appeal to those of-age-and-consenting types interested in creating racy footage of themselves without the goal of profiting (monetarily, anyhow).
Previous item: Rudy's Baseball Betrayal Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By driving bear, October 25, 2007 at 1:16 pm #
Guess what playboy does keep records and proof of age of all persons appearing in the mag. In fact every issue of playboy ( i subscribe to it ) prints who and where to contact to see the records. In fact playboy requires two forms of ID to be in the mag. So if a someone wants to submit a adult video to you tube or porn tube Id should be required
Report thisBy Contrarian, October 25, 2007 at 7:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
No, Driving Bear, websites that distribute adult material are part of the distribution chain, not part of the production chain. Those who make the pictures/videos are the production chain. Do you think that every 7-11 should maintain a copy of the drivers’ licenses of everyone that appears in Playboy? Of course not, and neither should websites that post pictures/videos produced by others.
Report thisBy Yakuna, October 25, 2007 at 6:37 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Internet is for porn
http://yakuna.com Best porn2.0 Web site
Report thisBy thomas billis, October 24, 2007 at 9:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Porn the byword of the religious right.If you could confiscate their computers it would be loaded with porn.I live in Las Vegas and whenever those conventions come in here from the midwest the adult stores have to load up.If it is all consenting adults whose business is it anyway.The Republicasns who continually run on the premise of getting government out of your faces are always the ones trying to regulate what adults do.If you do not like it do not watch it.If you do not like it on television change the channel.Please stop that ridiculous arguement we are just worried about the children.S-chip settled that.
Report thisBy rowdy, October 24, 2007 at 8:03 pm #
recently on one of my favorite porn sites,they were warning everyone of a proposed federal law, that would require all porn sites to have photo id of their users. i haven’t seen this warning lately so maybe this stupid legislation went away when craig got fucked. why the fuck should porn actors or anyone in the porn business have to show id to the government? is this to protect the precious fucking children? you know, the runaways and those abandoned by their self righteous fag hating parents,the ones that can’t accept their kids homosexuality? i lived in san francisco, long enough to know 12 and 13 year old boys who lived in the suburbs and were smart enough to come into the city and sell their young asses to anyone with $100. we have some fucked up puritanical values that transcend even the twisted sick values of the evangelical KKKristian right wing. the world is full of exhibitionist hedonists and all the kkkristian laws will never stop those who like seeing a good fuck,having a good fuck or showing themselves getting a good fuck.
Report thisBy driving bear, October 24, 2007 at 7:24 pm #
I personally disagree with the 6th circuit on this one. In 1988 when the current law was passed the Internet did not exist. Web sites that distribute adult material are part of the production chain and therefore should require ID of persons in adult pics/videos or remove the material from their site.
Report this