LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Corporate Tax Cheats by the Numbers

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Cooler Century? Wait and See
New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Child Insurance Gains, but a Veto Won’t Be Overridden

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Sep 25, 2007

The House has passed an expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program but failed to win enough votes to override President Bush’s promised veto. Still, SCHIP has overwhelming public support, and Democrats welcomed the opportunity to force Bush and his congressional allies to take a stand against poor children.

The president, while asking for hundreds of billions to keep the war running for another year, maintains that the $35-billion SCHIP program, financed in part by a tobacco tax hike, would be too expensive.

Bush’s veto pledge gives the lackluster Democrats some bonus ammunition heading into the next election. As Rep. Charlie Rangel said, “the question is, were you with the kids or were you not?”


AP:

SCHIP is a state-federal program that provides coverage for 6.6 million children from families that live above the poverty level but have trouble affording private health insurance. The proposed expansion, backed by most governors and many health-advocacy groups, would add 4 million children to the rolls.

The bill drew support from 45 House Republicans, many of them moderates who do not want to be depicted as indifferent to low-income children’s health needs when they seek re-election next year. But 151 Republicans sided with Bush, a move that Democrats see as a political blunder.

It hardly matters that the expansion would be expensive or a step toward socialized health care, Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., said during the House debate. When lawmakers go home, he said, “the question is, Were you with the kids or were you not?”

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By rowdy, September 26, 2007 at 10:17 pm Link to this comment

fuck the goddamned breeders and their children. stop making babies. i’m 60 i need health care more than your fucking kids do. i was never given tax dollars for my own health care when i was a child. my parents had to make do with whatever health care was provided by the local gov., for themselves as well as for their kids. it wasn’t much. use a goddamned rubber. don’t expect me to willingly provide for your useless inbred rug rats.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, September 26, 2007 at 6:12 pm Link to this comment

If the child insurance bill doesn’t get passed, before debate of the Iraq funding, this great nation should rally, march to the white house and congress, flush the occupants and hang them.

Take a few days off and have a special elections, nation wide, create a national holiday to celebrate the event.

Report this

By lodipete, September 26, 2007 at 10:05 am Link to this comment

The way I see it, About 15% of the electorate constitutes the republican “base” that Bush is trying to regain his appeal with. In 1994, corruption among House and Senate democrats was so bad, the republicans got quite a lift and took over the government until 2006, although the way the democrats have wussed out, you’d never know the repubs lost. Hopefully, this bill will be the first of many where the dems can actually demonstrate that there’s a difference between themselves and the bushies. Add general disgust with the war and the coming economic problems about to hit this country big time and the dems and their 20% “base” should be able to scarf up a large chunk of that undecided 65%. If not, I’m defecting to Sweden.

Report this

By rodney, September 26, 2007 at 8:41 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

No child of a millionaire left behind

Report this

By thomas billis, September 26, 2007 at 2:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The discipline of the Republican party is something to be admired.Whether it be killing 21 olds in a useless war or denying kids medical insurance they stick together.They give lemmings a bad name.They will follow this half a moron over the ledge.To try and understand this loyalty to a man instead of a country would probably take a more intelligent man than myself.They have run out of rational arguements what is next” Sig Heil”.Do not worry Republicans after the next elections I hear Bush is going to need brush clearers on his ranch in Crawford.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.