![]() |
|
||
|
Child Insurance Gains, but a Veto Won’t Be OverriddenPosted on Sep 25, 2007The House has passed an expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program but failed to win enough votes to override President Bush’s promised veto. Still, SCHIP has overwhelming public support, and Democrats welcomed the opportunity to force Bush and his congressional allies to take a stand against poor children. The president, while asking for hundreds of billions to keep the war running for another year, maintains that the $35-billion SCHIP program, financed in part by a tobacco tax hike, would be too expensive. Bush’s veto pledge gives the lackluster Democrats some bonus ammunition heading into the next election. As Rep. Charlie Rangel said, “the question is, were you with the kids or were you not?”
Advertisement Previous item: Child Insurance Gains, but a Veto Won’t Be Overridden Next item: Child Insurance Gains, but a Veto Won’t Be Overridden Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By rowdy, September 27, 2007 at 1:17 am #
fuck the goddamned breeders and their children. stop making babies. i’m 60 i need health care more than your fucking kids do. i was never given tax dollars for my own health care when i was a child. my parents had to make do with whatever health care was provided by the local gov., for themselves as well as for their kids. it wasn’t much. use a goddamned rubber. don’t expect me to willingly provide for your useless inbred rug rats.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, September 26, 2007 at 9:12 pm #
If the child insurance bill doesn’t get passed, before debate of the Iraq funding, this great nation should rally, march to the white house and congress, flush the occupants and hang them.
Take a few days off and have a special elections, nation wide, create a national holiday to celebrate the event.
Report thisBy lodipete, September 26, 2007 at 1:05 pm #
The way I see it, About 15% of the electorate constitutes the republican “base” that Bush is trying to regain his appeal with. In 1994, corruption among House and Senate democrats was so bad, the republicans got quite a lift and took over the government until 2006, although the way the democrats have wussed out, you’d never know the repubs lost. Hopefully, this bill will be the first of many where the dems can actually demonstrate that there’s a difference between themselves and the bushies. Add general disgust with the war and the coming economic problems about to hit this country big time and the dems and their 20% “base” should be able to scarf up a large chunk of that undecided 65%. If not, I’m defecting to Sweden.
Report thisBy rodney, September 26, 2007 at 11:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
No child of a millionaire left behind
Report thisBy thomas billis, September 26, 2007 at 5:10 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The discipline of the Republican party is something to be admired.Whether it be killing 21 olds in a useless war or denying kids medical insurance they stick together.They give lemmings a bad name.They will follow this half a moron over the ledge.To try and understand this loyalty to a man instead of a country would probably take a more intelligent man than myself.They have run out of rational arguements what is next” Sig Heil”.Do not worry Republicans after the next elections I hear Bush is going to need brush clearers on his ranch in Crawford.
Report this