![]() |
![]() |
||
|
More Bad News for BlackwaterPosted on Sep 23, 2007
Any lingering question as to whether Blackwater USA security contractors were to blame in the Sept. 16 shootout in Baghdad that left 11 Iraqis dead and 12 wounded may be cleared up by a videotape of the incident, which was reportedly filmed from a nearby police station.
Advertisement Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Jim Goodson, September 25, 2007 at 11:13 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Bring our troops home. Allow Blackwater to occupy Iraq.
Report thisBy zz ziled, September 24, 2007 at 4:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear Mr. Sheer,
I am ready to make you and your little friends stay after hours in detention. And believe me you will not like keyboarding thousand word essays under former State Department official J. Cofer Black’s detention conditions.
You fail to grasp that private security contractors like Blackwater are in Iraq and are operating under dangerous conditions and they are protecting and guarding State Department lives in Iraq.
These really big and buff men, with their big and macho weapons are doing an unpleasant, but necessary job for the Department of State on US and Iraqi Approved Contracts—-we at the DoS just don’t have the personnel to surge and cover all our operations in theater.
Just this morning Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki called and was pitchin’ another bitch to me about all the mercenaries running loose in his country after reading an article and some blogger jerk named Haas’s comments in the WAPO.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/government-inc/2007/09/private_armies_public_debate_1.html
I corrected the PM’s English usage and told him to find a new translator, because security contractors are NOT mercenaries under my husband G.W. Bush’s New American English standards.
I explained to the PM that private contractors can’t possible be considered mercenaries, because that might indeed be a violation of: “...Article 5 of the International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries of 1993, “States Parties shall not recruit, use, finance or train mercenaries and shall prohibit such activities” like that loser Haas pointed out…
And yeah so what, I told the PM that: “In some cases, legal devices are used to conceal the nature of the assignment or to make the mercenary appear to be a national of the country in whose armed
conflict he is involved. Although the use of such a device conceals the mercenary’s real status, information such as the origin of the contractual
relationship, the payment, the type of services agreed upon and the simultaneous use of other nationalities and passports, may serve as
evidence in establishing the true nationality of persons involved in an armed conflict who are justifiably suspected of being mercenaries…”
“In these cases, the legal loophole is that the law guarantees that the market may operate freely and that people may be recruited freely.
The person who recruits a potential mercenary is simply an intermediary and is not
committing an act that is illegal and criminal per se, since the mercenary will not necessarily receive money to commit a crime, the contract is
signed in a place other than where the criminal action will occur and the country’s laws do not classify mercenary activity in a separate category
which automatically links the name of the mercenary and his signing of a contract with the commission of a formally defined offence. This situation
calls for careful investigation and monitoring of market activities related to the recruitment of persons for unspecified services, which constitute a traffic that culminates in objective damage in a territory other than the one in which the contract was made and jeopardizes the sovereignty of a
third State, peoples’ lives, the economy and self-determination.
To prevent mercenary activities, States should consider, inter alia, the possibility of revoking the operating licences and permits of entities
that have hired mercenaries to engage in illegal activities, refusing
passports and visas to mercenaries and prohibiting them from passing
through the territory of other States.”
“http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1995/a-50-390.htm
All the ruffled feathers are smoothed out now in the Press except for you and your little troublemakers.
If you keep nonsense this up, you could be in real trouble.
Diplomatically yours,
Report thisCondi Rice—-that’s DOC RICE not DOC SPICE to you.
By boggs, September 24, 2007 at 4:04 pm #
If we, the people of the U.S allow our gov’t to use these mercenary groups in Iraq, then be prepared for viewing them in our U.S. cities when our president wants to insure “order” in a peace march or rally or protest.
Report thisBlackwater was sent into New Orleans after Katrina, and it was like cleaning the wounds with sewer water.
By C Quil, September 24, 2007 at 3:20 pm #
Just a thought - if Blackwater is no longer allowed to work in Iraq, who will protect the U.S. embassy staff and visiting officials? No one was allowed to travel out of the Green Zone, except by helicopter, when this first happened.
Since Bremer made sure that none of these people would ever be responsible for anything they did or answerable to the Iraq government, and the military have no jurisdiction over them, who will try them? Do you think they might just leave some dignitary “unguarded” if there was ever a hint of prosecution in the U.S.?
I’d like to know what these guys are going to do if the war in Iraq is ever over. Where would they fit in the world then?
Report thisBy Outraged, September 24, 2007 at 2:34 pm #
Blackwater employees and the company itself should be indicted for their crimes. We’ve had numerous separate unconfirmed reports of illegal activities by this group. Blackwater operates on the ground as a mercenary army for hire. There isn’t much difference between the Blackwater group and Al Qaeda.
Blackwater is not the only private security group operating in Iraq. There are private security groups from USIS and Dyncorp. There is updated information on these corporations as well as others, and their roles in Iraq at:
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=14700
An excerpt from the corpwatch article:
“Anbar Awakening
“The term Emergency Response Unit has also been used for various schemes that arm and equip local militias to fight Al Qaeda in Iraq under the auspices of the Ministry of the Interior. For example, some 2,500 men have been trained under such a scheme in Anbar province and another 800 in Babil province in the past year.(9)
But Lieutenant Colonel Michael Meese, an advisor to General David Petreaus, told CorpWatch that U.S. Special Forces were in charge of these ERU training schemes around the country, noting that they were different from the USIS training scheme at Camps Dublin and Solidarity.
Petraeus has personally lent his support by attending an ERU graduation ceremony in Hilla this past June.
The most widely touted example of U.S. Special Forces-trained ERU deployment has been in Anbar province, the vast western desert province that borders Jordan, Syria and Saudi Arabia, where Al Qaeda in Iraq and various sectarian forces are currently attacking Maliki government and occupation troops. In September 2006 Sheikh Abdul Sattar al-Rishawi, head of the Anbar Salvation Front, joined hands with the U.S.(31) The enemy-of-my-enemy alliance served al-Rishawi in various ways: It helped him fight off Al Quaeda of Iraq’s attempt to undermine his tribal power, and it procured special training for his followers.”
END PRIVITIZATION.
Report thisBy lawlessone, September 24, 2007 at 1:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Should this be called Blackwatergate, Bushwater, Bushwa or just more of the incredible Bushshit in which our esteemed leader has immersed us?
Report thisBy Miguel, September 24, 2007 at 7:50 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Concerning the fact that the American government, bush, and the corporations, are using tax payers money to fund their evil take over of the Middle East, and the rest of the world for that matter, why dont the American people stop paying taxes? It’s easy, just go down to your HR office, and ask to fill out a new W2 (or is it W4?) and enter 99 in the box after number of dependants. If every concerned American did this, there would be no money going to the government coffers.
Report thisWould the government arrest millions of Americans for not paying their taxes? Besides, all that is going on is the holding back of these taxes, which can be paid back later. Maybe.
Just a thought.
By purplewolf, September 24, 2007 at 3:17 am #
Waxman:
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE UNIFORMS IS: NOW THEY WERE DESIGNED BY ONE OF THE WORLDS TOP FASHION DESIGNERS. THEY ARE MADE OF BETTER QUALITY FABRIC, WASH AND WEAR-NO NEED TO IRON. THEY ARE MORE STYLIST AND MODERN AND THE LOGO IS DIFFERENT. OTHER THAN THAT AND THE WEAPONS UPGRADE, THEY STILL REEK OF THE VILENESS THAT SURROUNDED THE SS TROOPS. SH-T IS SH-T NO MATTER WHAT IT WEARS OR HOW YOU TRY TO CAMOUFLAGE IT!
Report thisBy waxman, September 24, 2007 at 12:35 am #
WHATS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLACKWATER TROOPS AND THE BLACK UNIFORMS OF THE SS TROOPS IN WWII ???
Report thisBy mark, September 23, 2007 at 11:59 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It doesn’t matter what evidence shows up, Blackwater is staying. They have full WH support and unconditional funding from Democratic Congress. Suck it up Maliki.
Report thisBy sns, September 23, 2007 at 11:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
we will need an army against this private army*
(*to the truthdig editors: please do not edit or delete my comments)
Report thisBy ocjim, September 23, 2007 at 10:55 pm #
The neocons in their ideological dribble which prescribes privatization of everything have been proven wrong for decades. Furthermore their efforts to deregulate and to supersize with monolithic corporations at the helm is also a vast failure for everyone else. The obscene game that neocons are playing which provides privatized forces to do the bidding of the elite and no one else is a dangerous precedent, not only in terms of stealing taxpayer money but also in terms of stealing our rights and our freedom. How do you think these troops will be used in the event of martial law. They have already conducted maneuvers to that end.
Report thisBy catoutofthebag, September 23, 2007 at 10:39 pm #
Looks like Maliki just signed his own death warrant. It’s not nice to fool with the hand that feeds and bleeds you.
Report thisBy QuyTran, September 23, 2007 at 9:50 pm #
At least Condi Rice has to show her “blow job” policy
Report this