|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
Raytheon’s New ‘Silent Guardian’ Brings the PainPosted on Sep 20, 2007
Reporting on cutting-edge new military gadgetry gives this UK journalist, the Daily Mail’s Michael Hanlon, an unpleasant dose of the reality of modern warfare—and leads him to wonder about the significance, and possible uses of, Raytheon’s new “Silent Guardian” mega-zapper.
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Karl, October 26, 2007 at 8:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Kinder to shoot a man.
With lethal force, people who use it are less likely to be trigger happy than with this or a stun gun or tasier.
When presented with taking life in preservation of one’s own, as with firearms, most sane people will only make the final call when there is no other option.
Report thisBy Karl, October 26, 2007 at 8:33 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Kinder to shoot a man.
Report thisBy T, McCoy, October 17, 2007 at 11:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s probably too late to inform any of the above lunatics about their false claims to this device. A more balanced approach with info about testing can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System
Report thisBy Richard Roe, September 21, 2007 at 11:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The lie in the store is the phrase “similar to” microwave energy. It IS microwave energy. They just don’t want to use that label because it conjures up images everyone can relate to of food being cooked.
It’s a short jump from there to imagine people being “cooked”, by this weapone, which is exactly what is being done. It’s happening from the inside out, just like with your home microwave, and that’s why there are no obvious markings externally. Internally, they are literally boiling your blood!
And, yes, just like your home microwaves, metals such as wrings, watches, eyeglasses, bracelets, etc.
cause an arcing/buring effect.
There are lots of stories on this and they’re not new. Just search “Microwave weapon”.
Report thisBy Den, September 21, 2007 at 9:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
How many millions have been spent on this steaming pile? Anyone with a parabolic mirror could return the power back to it’s source and burn out the stupid thing. Or wrap yourself in reflective material and feel nothing.
Don’t toss those tinfoil hats just yet, they might come in handy.
Raytheon isn’t too BRIGHT huh?
Report thisBy purplewolf, September 21, 2007 at 12:48 am Link to this comment
Wow a giant microwave, lets put Dicko Cheney in its path and give it a test drive to see if it really works, if it does it will destroy his new pacemaker.
Finally a product made in America, how come I feel no pride about this?
When Rayhteon called this device a “Directed Energy Solutions” machine, G.W. thought it was the answer to Americas energy problems.
Report thisBy Michael Gass, September 20, 2007 at 10:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Outraged,
I would not go so far as to say “non-lethal force” technology should be outlawed.
I ask, “where did they test it?”, “on who?”, “when?”
How do they KNOW that prolonged exposure has no long-term, negative, effects?
Many, like myself, were told by the Golden company that their portable x-ray unit had no “lasting” effects, only to find later that maybe, it did.
Report thisBy Outraged, September 20, 2007 at 9:27 pm Link to this comment
This is only the tip of the iceberg. (Read War and Anti-War, by the Toflers, even this book is 10+yrs. old) Most likely, a protype was built 10 yrs. ago or more.
Again, this punishes the activity without trial or justification of crime. Looks like it’s going wholesale folks, they’re just going to skip that “middle man” the courtroom. How Raytheon has “convinced” itself this is non-lethal is beyond imagination.
Time to start legislation to criminalize entities or persons which use these types of devices including tasers without warrant, so that stiff penalties are in place to protect the unsuspecting public.
Report thisBy Michael Gass, September 20, 2007 at 6:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Let’s see… a beam that hurts but doesn’t kill (supposedly… can we guess what prolonged exposure would do?).
And they had to test just that… yes? On WHO did they test it and where?
Report thisBy particle61, September 20, 2007 at 4:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
hey news fans-
http://www.redstateupdate reported on the develpoment of Active Denial Technologies (and how local police want to get their hands the weapon) way back in 2005, see story-
Police Forces Won’t be Denied in Active Pursuit of Heat-Ray
http://www.redstateupdate.net/full-page/fullpage-archive-13.html
redstateupdate.net covers heat-rays, space surveillance, TSA follies, police clamp downs and other efforts at ‘crowd control’ in Orange Alert America with humor and prescience- see ‘crowd control’ and ‘one nation, under surveillance’ archives.
and a new gwbush comic every week
http://www.redstateupdate.net/verbatim/verbatim.html
http://www.redstateupdate.net
Report thisfunny, frightening, free
and ‘it’s all true’