|
|||
|
Intelligence Chief Gets His Facts Mixed UpPosted on Sep 13, 2007After German authorities foiled a terror plot earlier this month, U.S. National Intelligence Director J. Michael McConnell was all to eager to give credit to recently revised FISA rules, arguing, in effect, that potential civil liberty violations helped save American lives. Woops. It turns out that much of the information used by the Germans was obtained under the old FISA law, which McConnell continues to claim wasn’t effective enough. Needless to say, he was forced to clarify his testimony.
Advertisement CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By 1drees, September 14, 2007 at 9:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Intelligence Chief Gets His Facts Mixed Up” shows how “intelligent” intelligence is .. and to a smart person that is nothing new. coz smart people know that in this 21st century the only rare commodity is truth and then in certain circles its intelligence.
Report thisBy THOMAS BILLIS, September 14, 2007 at 9:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Is this the guy who said when he saw Osama with his beard dyed ” how can they expect us to catch a master of disguises.”
Report thisBy Louise, September 14, 2007 at 8:19 pm Link to this comment
Maria [#100407]
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act [FISA] resulted from extensive investigations by Senate Committees into the legality of domestic intelligence activities.
Following Nixon’s efforts to do what dubya has done with unprecedented success, the act was created in 1978 to provide oversight of covert surveillance activities, while maintaining secrecy. The law required a special warrant, issued by the FISA Court, which was specifically created to review requests and issue warrants allowing covert surveillance ... usually within 72 hours.
If the request was considered serious enough to be a national security threat, the warrant could be issued retroactively.
The argument made by so many Constitutional lawyers against the Bush administrations outrageous behavior was that, under the old FISA law, they could have accomplished whatever they needed to accomplish. Which is why U.S. National Intelligence Director McConnell’s remarks are so important. The administrations claim they needed to break the law to protect us is made ridiculous by the reports of this case. Which in itself appears to be questionable, if not ridiculous. And all of this leads, and has led to the obvious conclusion, their behavior has never been about national security so much as it has been about doing things that are clearly illegal ... in absolute secrecy.
In the process of following orders from their little king, the repub controlled congress made amendments to the 1978 FISA law, which among other things specifies interaction between citizens and non-citizens. It is now “legal” in “certain” cases to conduct “illegal” surveillance on citizens phone calls, mail, email, bank records, and just about anything else. The new “standards” are confusing and frankly irrelevant, since the repub controlled congress gave the little king pretty much everything he needed to cover his ass when they gave him the Military Commission Act of 2006.
The real shocker is how little our congress, particularly our republican congresaurs understand and respect Constitutional law!
One expects the average citizen to not understand the law without a refresher course, but there is no excuse for our representatives and senators. Even more shocking is how unconcerned they appear to be about the obvious ramifications of the unconstitutional legislation passed in 2006!
Report thisBy Outraged, September 14, 2007 at 6:49 pm Link to this comment
Re: #100271 by Mike Mid-City on 9/13
I mean the Bush Administration is credible right?
——————————————-
Not to be anal or anything but could you have possibly meant:
I mean the Bush Administration is credible “right”?
I’m sorry, but it just was screaming for “correction”. I hope you don’t mind.
Report thisBy farmertx, September 14, 2007 at 4:44 pm Link to this comment
Maria
Report thisSadly, American politics is hard for American’s to fully grasp.
The Shrub has taken powers that the Constitution did not grant him. For a while, he had a tame Attorney General that ok’d every illegal act Shrub wanted him to ok.
The FISA laws,as I understand them, require 1 party to be outside the US. In the case of both parties being outside the US, I am told that many communication routes, be they land line, cell, Internet or whatever, pass thru a point that can be accessed by Government Agents.
The FISA laws are all but moot, as the Shrub can appeal to a secret court, set up by his people, for any warrent or ruling.
Understand one thing about our Election Process; while the vote for President includes all eligible citizens, that is ignored in a sense, and the Electoral College awards ‘delegates’ based on who got the most votes in each State. The more populous the State, the more delegates.
In 2000, more American’s voted for Al Gore than the Shrub. But Shrubs’ votes came from the more populous States, thus he was declared the winner. No other office in this country is decided in such a manner.
I think there have been 3 or 4 instances where the candidate with less actual votes was declared the winner, none since the 1800’s, except Shrub.
Then, in ‘04, a Rupublican supporter that controlled a voting machine manufacturer supplied machines that insured Shrub would get the most votes, regardless of how people actually voted.
American Democracy has many flaws that are coming to light. The flaws have been there, but no one besides the Shrub was low enough to take advantage of them.
Folks on sites such as this one are working to insure that none of this is repeated.
Our news media is, at times, more concerned about which female celebrity isn’t wearing enough clothes and doesn’t always print or discuss all the real news.
That is why folks such as yourself are appreciated here. Any future news or facts that are uncovered over there will be happily read and considered here.
By Maria, September 14, 2007 at 11:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
@farmertx and Louise: You’re welcome
I very much enjoy meeting sane US-Americans. They’ve been rare in the last years.
Today the press is utterly silent. The three (up to 49, Justice said, a number that the BKA called “idiotic”) alleged terrorists have disappeared from the news. But undoubtedly this is because now the police are working to make sense of it.
There is another thing that struck me as odd with regard to your FISA laws. Don’t those laws regulate in which way your government may tap internal phone lines? Please correct me if I’m wrong, but I was under the impression that those laws explicitely permit tapping foreign lines and that the line is drawn when one party of the conversation is within the US. And the other thing is that the “new FISA laws” should permit listening in to conversations when one end is based in the USA, right? Does that mean that McConnell implies that there was a direct connection to a US citizen or at least a line within the USA? Otherwise it would make no sense at all to say that the wiretapping was a result of the new laws.
It all reminds me of Gladio-type ops. I’m waiting to hear of a new Oktoberfest terror strike or of another Bologna. But then, Madrid was no less and it backfired utterly.
Report thisBy Louise, September 14, 2007 at 4:43 am Link to this comment
“It turns out that much of the information used by the Germans was obtained under the old FISA law, which McConnell continues to claim wasnt effective enough.
Needless to say, he was forced to clarify his testimony.”
***
Then we receive further clarification from Maria, (#100329)
“One journalist commented that if these men were what terror camps turned out, there was every reason to let the camps continue, because the terrorists would remove themselves before they harmed anybody.”
Thanks Maria!
Perhaps we should use the same approach regarding our various arms of “intelligence” who give clear meaning to the Bush philosophy of speaking and doing in antonyms.
Perhaps there is every reason to let the intelligence people, AKA Bush’s nincompoops continue on in their pursuit of terrorists, because they will no doubt trip each other down the stairs before they have a chance to blow up the world.
We should be so lucky!
Unfortunately, that would require removing the 18 to 20% who still believe these folks actually have intelligence, and of course we cant do that, because we don’t believe in violence.
Maybe we could help them understand the meaning of the word intelligence.
Naw, first we’d have to teach them the meaning of the word understand. A hopeless assignment!
Report thisBy farmertx, September 14, 2007 at 2:13 am Link to this comment
Maria
Report thisThanks for sharing the news from Germany.
If we here in America stop and think, nothing more has been heard of the terrorist’s who were caught while planning an attack on Ft Dix, nor the ones who allegedly wanted to blow up the fuel farm at JFK.
A little disinformation goes a long ways.
As to McConnell getting his facts confused, he’s just following the lead of Shrub who thought he was in Austria at an OPEC meeting instead of being in Australia at an APEC meeting.
As any hard charging DA will tell you, too many facts will destroy a perfectly good case.
By Maria, September 14, 2007 at 12:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Hello.
I’m from Germany and I thought there are a few things you might like to know about that “terror plan”.
The rumour that “Americans” would have been attacked sprung from the Ministry of Defense. As a German I have no idea why they were involved in the first place. This is, after all, a criminal case.
It took all of 2 hours for the Ministry of Justice to reverse that and say that “American airport facilities at Frankfurt” would be attacked. Which is a bit silly, considering that these facilities were given up in 1991 and formally returned to Germany in 1999. I should have thought the Ministry of Justice would know that.
Then, another three hours later, the BKA (comparable to the FBI) said, they expected “bars frequented by US soldiers to be attacked”.
Later that day the first tickers reported that the “terrorists” had bought 720kg of H2O2 in a 35% solution to make TATP, but they wouldn’t have been successful because the H2O2 had been exchanged with a 3% solution (known as bleach for laundries, hair and cleaning ingredient for swimming pools, greenhouses and such).
That claim quickly alerted a few chemists, who (around another two hours later) issued the first comments. The next day their comments were all over the news: TATP is dangerous, yes. Because it explodes as you make it - unless you’ve got a full chemical lab and facilities and are an experienced chemist and a few months of being undisturbed. Not that the young men matched any of those requirements. Even chemists don’t make the stuff, simply because it’s too unstable.
To get it stable, it emerged one day later, you’d need a “stabilised emulsion”. The chemist who said that also estimated that there might be “20-30 chemists in the world” able to do that, all working for specialised companies.
There were other strange things.
Such as the claim that “500 police officers” had been involved in tracking the “terrorists” for “six months” after the purchase of the H2O2. 1) The “terrorists” were in a village with 900 people, where strangers stand out like a sore thumb. 2) The surveillance had begun in 2006 and ended March 2007(!), when 3) a German magazine (national) reported on the fact that the police had not been able to find anything untoward.
How the young men had communicated with whomever remained unclear. From the Ministry of Defense came the claim that it had been done by shared email accounts. How they found that out is unknown, but since it comes from Defense, it’s likely to come from the US. Apparently there is no other evidence for this, most notably the alleged data have not been shared with Germany. That makes this whole claim a bit spurious, so it will be interesting to see whether the data will turn up at a trial.
Another piece of “evidence” is that Defense claimed the men had talked about “terror attacks” on the phone. Which doesn’t sound very professional to me, but does sound a lot like something every German does about once a month, because the matter is in most people’s minds.
Finally it is claimed that these men visited a “terror camp” run by a group in Usbekistan (Pakistan by other sources). That is rather strange, as this group is still run and financed by the CIA.
To put it bluntly: the very vast majority of Germans is convinced that these young men were either patsies or so dumb that there was no reason to stop them.
One journalist commented that if these men were what “terror camps” turned out, there was every reason to let the camps continue, because the “terrorists” would remove themselves before they harmed anybody.
Report thisBy Enemy of State, September 13, 2007 at 8:14 pm Link to this comment
In the good old days getting caught in a lie actually had consequences. That doesn’t seem to be true anymore.
Report this