Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
January 22, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Born to Run
Draw Your Weapon!

Truthdig Bazaar
The Beginner’s Goodbye

The Beginner’s Goodbye

By Anne Tyler

more items

Ear to the Ground
Email this item Print this item

Former DOJ Lawyer Blasts Bush Torture Policy

Posted on Sep 5, 2007

Wouldn’t it have been chillingly fascinating to watch White House bigwigs in action sometime around 2003, while they played fast and loose with executive power and international law?  Jack L. Goldsmith, who headed up the Office of Legal Counsel for a brief and exhausting nine-month tenure in 2003-4, did just that and more.  Now, Goldsmith is releasing an explosive book, “The Terror Presidency,” in which he describes numerous clashes with key members of the Bush administration about “the legal limits of executive power in the post-9/11 world,” as Jeffrey Rosen puts it in his New York Times magazine preview of Goldsmith’s story.

The New York Times Magazine:

The heroes of Goldsmith’s book—his historical models of presidential leadership in wartime—are Presidents Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Both of them, as Arthur Schlesinger noted in his essay “War and the Constitution,” “were lawyers who, while duly respecting their profession, regarded law as secondary to political leadership.” In Goldsmith’s view, an indifference to the political process has ultimately made Bush a less effective wartime leader than his greatest predecessors. Surprisingly, Bush, who is not a lawyer, allowed far more legalistic positions in the war on terror to be adopted in his name, without bothering to try to persuade Congress and the public that his positions were correct. “I don’t know if President Bush understood how extreme some of the arguments were about executive power that some people in his administration were making,” Goldsmith told me. “It’s hard to know how he would know.”

The Bush administration’s legalistic “go-it-alone approach,” Goldsmith suggests, is the antithesis of Lincoln and Roosevelt’s willingness to collaborate with Congress. Bush, he argues, ignored the truism that presidential power is the power to persuade. “The Bush administration has operated on an entirely different concept of power that relies on minimal deliberation, unilateral action and legalistic defense,” Goldsmith concludes in his book. “This approach largely eschews politics: the need to explain, to justify, to convince, to get people on board, to compromise.”

Read more

More Below the Ad


Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments

By Eric Kramer, September 12, 2007 at 5:41 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Amazingly insightful of the corrupted nature of the political world around us (as are many of our greatest artists), Warren Zevon was absolutely on-the-money when he penned his classic song, ‘Lawyers, Guns & Money’, all without which modern warfare, as we know it in America, would be impossible.

Report this

By Juan Voyce, September 8, 2007 at 8:03 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

He supported the policy but not the legal justifications for the policy?  Does he think the policy actions were legal or not?  His parsing of words does not make him a dissident.  It makes him complicitous then and a rat now; a model of full-employment for lawyers.

Report this
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Like Truthdig on Facebook