The Washington Post has three excellent reports that refute the rosy depiction of Iraq by so many politicians and pundits these days. After such a lousy prewar performance for the media in general, it’s nice to see one of the most mainstream of outlets dig in and investigate what’s really going on while the administration tries to pass off hype as genuine progress.
Washington Post:
Weighing the ‘Surge’
Nearly every week, American generals and politicians visit Combat Outpost Gator, nestled behind a towering blast wall in the Dora market. They arrive in convoys of armored Humvees, sometimes accompanied by helicopter gunships, to see what U.S. commanders display as proof of the effectiveness of a seven-month-long security offensive, fueled by 30,000 U.S. reinforcements. Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. military leader in Iraq, frequently cites the market as a sign of progress.
Link
Many Trainees Are Complicit With ‘Enemy Targets’
Less than a mile away, a powerful Shiite parliament member stood inside an American military base, in the office of the Iraqi army brigade commander responsible for Kadhimiyah. The Americans had called for Iraqi army backup, but according to the brigade commander and American officers, the lawmaker would help ensure that no assistance arrived from the Iraqis that crucial day.
Link
Signing Up Sunnis With ‘Insurgent’ on Their Résumés
Naiem al-Qaisi was imprisoned for four months, beaten, shocked with electric probes and, he said, forced to witness fellow Sunni male prisoners being raped by Shiite soldiers of the Iraqi army.
Now he wants to be a policeman. The American military recruited Qaisi and thousands like him to fight the Sunni insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq, but Qaisi’s most feared enemies are soldiers in the Iraqi army’s Muthanna Brigade, and his allegiance does not lie with the government he is now being trained to serve.
Link
Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

.
Previous item: Bad News for Older Smokers
Next item: For Orwell, Life Imitated Art
By farmertx, September 6, 2007 at 10:01 am Link to this comment
Boggs, Shrub felt the need to be macho and what better way than to visit a war zone, although one of the safer areas, but still a war zone.
Report thisThat way, he can say that he has seen with his own eyes how great everything is. And the lock step Republican’s will all nod and say he did just that. And the damn Democrat’s will play politics as usual, rather than taking any meaningful action.
That the GAO report went from 3 of 18 goals met to 11 of 18 goals met, shows the hand of the Shrub, albeit indirectly.
The Pentagon produced data (thats what its called when you make something up, isn’t it?) that showed partial progress on 6 of the unmet goals and stated that it was too soon to be sure about two other goals.
We all remember “Mission Accomplished” and take the ‘kicking ass’ statement with that in mind.
By boggs, September 6, 2007 at 8:43 am Link to this comment
Bush announced while speaking in Australia that “We Are Kicking Ass!”
Report thisI believe the “Portreus report” will be better known as the “Bush Report”.
Does anyone else wonder why he stopped over in Iraq to visit the Gen. Portreus?
Just ahead of report time!
By DennisD, September 4, 2007 at 6:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The approval rating for all our politicians is so low it can’t be measured and I’m sure even that assessment is inflated.
Report thisThe pity is that we’ve become conditioned to expecting very little if anything from our government and we’re never disappointed when we receive it.
By PACRAT, September 4, 2007 at 8:58 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Why do we keep beating this to death?
By now everyone, including the neocon republicans, know that the truth rarely comes out of the White House, aka “spin city.”
Does anyone expect Gen Petraeus to report anything his boss, Bush, doesn’t want to hear?C’mon!
Aren’t you just fatigued, bored, totally cynical about this administration?
Question: Can the invertebrate democrats do anything about it?
Report thisBy felicity, September 4, 2007 at 8:25 am Link to this comment
One of the reasons for Bush’s recent ‘drop-down’ into Iraq, according to him, was so that he could see for himself what was going on. Why did he need to see what was going on? So he, the brilliant strategist, tactician, commander-in-chief could ‘decide’ what course to follow in Iraq.
So, in the near future we can expect an informed, intelligent, even stellar assessment of the Iraq ‘situation’ speech delivered to Congress by the ‘decider’. The majority of members in Congress will then dutifully vote to carry out all that the ‘decider’ recommends.
When the Bushies brag about the lack of terrorist attacks on US soil since 9/11, they’re sorely mistaken. I’m convinced that some deadly mind-numbing gaseous substance is being pumped into the air-conditioning ducts of all government buildings inside the Belt-way. How else to account for this lunacy.
Report thisBy farmertx, September 4, 2007 at 7:03 am Link to this comment
‘Bout time.
The fact that the insurgents can be chased out of one area doesn’t seem to be a sign of progress.
In a roach infested apartment building, one tennant can chase all the roaches in their apartment into others. And that solves the problem for 3 or 4 days.
Then they start reappearing.
These Iraqis’ can remember vendetta’s from 200 years ago in their tribe or family. Anyone who thinks that they will set that aside for an outsider hasn’t a clue to reality. See Northern Ireland/Great Britian; strife off and on for over 800 years.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. That is how bin Ladin got his start; as an operative of the CIA backed Afghan resistance.
Those that cannot/willnot remember history are doomed to repaet it.
Report thisShrub used to brag about never reading anything. And his actions as a “leader” have proven that brag. One of the few brags of his that has any basis in fact.
History to the Shrub is ‘It’s his story againt my story. What are you gonna believe? Your eyes or my lies?’