![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Nuclear Proliferation at a CrossroadsPosted on Sep 2, 2007
If the Bush administration is now in peacenik mode with North Korea, why not more aggressively follow the diplomatic track with Iran? As a result of a startling turnabout by an administration committed to wage war against “rogue nations,” it turns out offers of aid and diplomatic recognition might work wonders in stemming the spread of the nuclear threat.
Previous item: Craig Cries Uncle Next item: Real-Life Violence Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By kevin99999, September 3, 2007 at 11:18 am # Nuclear non-profileration is an important international objective but it should apply to all countries including the U.S., otherwise there is no legitimate basis for nuclear non-profileration.
By rbrooks, September 3, 2007 at 10:08 am # Here was me thinking that Dr. Strangelove was fiction: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/artic le2369001.ece Seems obvious that an attack on Iran will have the same purpose, and the same effect on the Middle East, as 9/11 had in the U.S. - empowering the extremists and disabling whatever movement there may be in Iran toward getting rid of them With that in mind, it also seems obvious that Ahmadinejad may actually welcome an attack and may be happy to help provoke it. Not that he needs to organize a provocation; Bush and the Pentagon will have that covered. All he needs to do is keep obliging Bush by running his mouth. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article