![]() |
|
||
|
GAO Report: Only 3 out of 18 Iraq Goals MetPosted on Aug 30, 2007The Washington Post has obtained a draft of the Government Accountability Office’s “progress” report—quite the euphemism in this case—about Iraq. The 69-page draft, which the paper describes as “strikingly negative,” was apparently passed along by a government official worried that the final draft would be altered to lessen its detrimental impact.
Advertisement Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By boggs, August 31, 2007 at 11:19 pm #
Cyrena,
Report thisI sort of think that Iran will eventually take up the slack in Iraq and throw our butts out of there.
I would much prefer to see Iran take control then to leave the Iraqi people at the mercy of the US.
By cyrena, August 31, 2007 at 11:04 pm #
98009 by boggs,
There it is in the nutshell. These have NEVER been goals for the Iraqis, but rather a list of things that Cheney wants them to do. In short, it’s extortion…
We’re holding them hostage in their own land, demanding that they do this, that, and the other thing, even though the only “benchmark” the White House cares about is the signing of the Hydrocarbon Law.
So, bascially, that’s what the “benchmarks” are. They’re a list of demands just like any other individual or group comes up with, when they highjack something, and hold people hostage.
In this case, they’ve demanded that the Iraqis sign over all of their oil, (80% of it at least) and…if they DON’T..the punishment is that 1)we will NOT leave, no matter what you try to do to us. 2)we’re NOT giving you any of the reconstruction money until you sign over the oil. 3) Just to be clear, we’re not leaving without it.
So, based on that, I think what is needed is an ace “hostage negotiation team” that can come in and try to negotiate with the Mob, and see if there’s any way to get them to agree to release the remaining hostages in Iraq. (the ones that haven’t already died or fled in this on-going hostage crises).
Ordinarily, we’d expect the UN to maybe take the lead here, but…I fear the Mob controls them as well.
It’s a major catastrophe, but I guess that’s the understatement of the day.
Report thisBy boggs, August 31, 2007 at 10:43 pm #
Those 18 goals that our gov’t keeps referring to are OUR goals, not Iraqi goals.
Report thisI wish Malacki would tell Bush, and our senators to shove the goals up their butts.
By cyrena, August 31, 2007 at 2:38 pm #
As the White House and the Boy George react to this report, the Boy said in a speech yesterday, that there “progress” that really matters, is the progress that is taking place in the lives and neighborhoods of the Iraqi people. THAT, he says, is the real “progress”.
So, we’ll just assume that he believes that the mass exodus of millions of Iraqis from their neigborhoods, must be “progress”. For his agenda, that probably IS progress. There are that many fewer people there to fight for their rights, and to save their oil from all out theft.
Meantime, anybody that has remained, is now safely locked-up in those concrete enclaves (the neighborhoods the Boy mentioned) and they can’t get in or out, so they’re “safe”.
Big progress.
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/08/30/3495/
Report thisBy PACRAT, August 31, 2007 at 10:21 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Three Out of Eighteen - Bench ‘em, Busho!
Having managed several large government contracts I am sure that my contracts would have been cancelled and I would have been held liable of fraud if I achieved only 3 of 18 goals or objectives during the prescribed time.
Either the contractor lied and didn’t expect the objectives to be met, or the parties didn’t agree to the objectives, or there was deceit all around!
To get back to the basketball analogy, if I only scored 3 out of 18 I would expect to not only be benced but thrown off the team!
The problem is that Iraq is now and always was a soverign power and an outside government can’t impose objectives without their consent. Why can’t our goverment just butt out - and bring our troops home to return to their families and lives?
“Cut and run” is a republican construct and no one in his or her right mind would expect a rapid withdrawal, it just isn’t logistically possible. But it is way beyond time to blow the whistle.
Don’t expect anythinig objective from Petraeus - who’s his boss?
Report thisBy THOMAS BILLIS, August 31, 2007 at 6:25 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hillary if you can read please read the GAO report before you put more of our servicepeople at risk by insinuating the surge is working.If there is no political solution there is no solution.The GAO report shows there is no movement in the political arena so there is no success.So please Hillary in your surge to the nomination please try and understand a topic before you speak.By giving some credence to the the notion that anything is working in Iraq you are just prolonging the agony until reasonable minds come together and get us out.Please Ms Clinton read the report.
Report thisBy Enemy of State, August 30, 2007 at 11:47 pm #
QuyTran: “It must be none of them !”
This is the true tragedy. As long as Bush can find some minor straws of hope, we will be stuck approving yet another Friedman Unit.
The last I heard, they aren’t going to spin it, but let the different generals give their own reports. The DOD is reportedly doing this because the military doesn’t want to be “responsible” for the resulting policy (continuing the surge), but wants it to be clearly seen to be Bushes decision. Of course the plan is to this report on September 11th. After a day of emotional recreations (and Muslim bating), we will trot out the patriotic music, and then trumpet the “progress” made by our brave servicemen.
ocjim: Even with a draft we couldn’t have forces available in time. Unless we were to send almost totally untrained, and underequiped soldiers into IED alley. Also the military leaders are concerned about our readiness for an unforseen emergency. But Bush won’t have any part of that, objections are dismissed as defeatism. (Kinda reminds you of the Wehrmacht in 1945 doesn’t it.)
Report thisBy ocjim, August 30, 2007 at 6:14 pm #
Incredibly the criminal BushCo has slready convinced many in the media, saying that the surge is a success. This report and other independent reports suggest modest gains which will only continue if American surge forces continue well into the next year (impossible without a draft) and if Iraqi forces cooperate (pipedream). The civilian toll has not declined but that never was important to Shrub. And now we have to worry about a foray into Iran. Don’t let wimp democrats, the BushCo propaganda, or the corporate media railroad us agains.
Report thisBy QuyTran, August 30, 2007 at 5:38 pm #
3 out of 18 Iraq goals are met still too high ! It must be none of them !
Report thisBy farmertx, August 30, 2007 at 4:07 pm #
This looming progress report deadline just might be one more reasonShrub is anxious to start bombing Iran; get the public’s mind off Iraq.
Report thisI read where one unidentified officer, of staff rank, was quoted as saying that maybe the idea of installing Western style Democracy in Iraq was a mistake.
Ya think?
I can remember the Shrub saying in an interview years ago now, that bringing Peace to the world was his goal and he felt that it could be done.
Coming from a person who had never accomplished anything, it sounded ludicrous. And still does.
No doubt the report that Preterus(sp?) will present will be thoroughly vetted, if not entirely written, by the WH.
Already the WH is saying that different standards are being used in measuring ‘progress’. I bet.
Anything to avoid the Shrub being seen as the most clueless President in all history, although, in reality, it is way too late to avoid that.
By RunsWithScissors, August 30, 2007 at 3:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I can’t wait to hear how they spin 16.6% into 83.4%.
Report this