LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 11, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Frightening Charts From the Senate Inequality Hearing

Morris Berman and the Decline of America

More From Chris Hedges on Black Bloc

Perfection

Truthdigger of the Week: 9th Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Political Divide

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
The Future of Liberalism

The Future of Liberalism

By Alan Wolfe
$17.13

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Big Brother Update With National Intel Director

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Aug 23, 2007

J. Michael McConnell, the director of national intelligence, has in part explained Congress’ hurry to revise domestic surveillance law. It seems that the FISA court, established three decades ago to keep the government from abusively spying on American citizens, decided that the administration’s warrantless wiretapping program was illegal—and that just wouldn’t do.


Los Angeles Times:

The decision meant that the government had to get a court order to trace calls or e-mails that traveled on networks inside the United States, even if the parties at both ends were overseas.

The government obtained a temporary stay allowing it to continue intercepting e-mails and phone calls without individual warrants through May 31, McConnell said, as he began sounding alarms on Capitol Hill that a key piece of the nation’s counter-terrorism capabilities was about to be crippled.

Those warnings fueled a frantic, end-of-summer push in Congress to rewrite laws passed three decades ago, after U.S. intelligence agencies had been caught spying on student groups and other domestic targets. The emergency legislation, which is set to expire in six months, allowed the government to resume its eavesdropping operations without individual warrants.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Don66, August 26, 2007 at 12:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

While it would be nice to blame only the White House for spying on Americans, equal blame can be shared by our new majority Congress. It has been reported in the LA Times that members of the Democratic Congress admitted that they were in such a rush to recess that they approved the authorization without understanding it. This is the same bunch who approved the invasion of Iraq without reading what they approved. We should vote all the bums out and let them get a job where they need to read the instructions before they do the job.
As long as we keep voting only by party, without understanding what the candidate really believes, this is what we’ll get. Anyone who actually believes the present crop running, with the exception of a couple, will get us out of Iraq should wake-up.

Report this

By June, August 25, 2007 at 10:07 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

While I fiercely object to the government’s spying on us (we didn’t seem to approve of such things when the KGB was doing it in Russia!), on the other hand, I hope somebody up there is vetting my remarks on a daily basis.  It would appear to be the only way my voice is ever going to be heard by the people I want to address!!

Report this

By cyrena, August 24, 2007 at 7:30 pm Link to this comment

#96642 by Johnny Doughey on 8/23 at 11:02 pm
(11 comments total)

The administration is saying that if Congree does not backdate this current law, the suits might bankrupt the phone companies.  I say that if they were breaking the law, which the administration apparently believes they were, they deserve to be bankrupt.

Johnny,
You hit it real close. The “back dating” is of the utmost importance to them, for the simple purpose of covering their own legal asses. They have enough sense to know that while they might remain “above the law” as long as they ARE the law, it won’t necessarily be that way when the clock runs out on this so far 7 year episode of holding us all hostage. (presumably, that was the whole reason for hijacking our government to begin with).

So, when the FISA court made sure that it was STILL illegal for the Mob to wiretap US citizens in their own country, without a warrent, just like it was when they initiated the law 30 years ago, then White House Mob had to do something quickly, to change it, (retroactively) to cover their asses.

Same thing with the torture memos that Gonzo whipped up, back when he was still the Mob Counsel. They just make stuff legal, after they’ve been doing it for a while, knowing full well that it’s all illegal.

So yeah, it might indeed bankrupt the telecommunications companies, but I don’t see as how that would be such a bad thing. That’s the same as hitting the Mob’s billfold, and that’s not a bad thing at all. Maybe we could get some of our money back, and set-up our own telecommunications system.

Anyway, it’s not the “administration” that believes the phone companies were breaking the law, because it was the “administration” that demanded that they break the law.

It was the FISA court, (who Gonzo apparently doesn’t control) who said that they were breaking the law. And, I’m sure they know that the phone companies are breaking the law at the request of the Mob/Administration.

Report this

By Scott, August 24, 2007 at 6:54 am Link to this comment

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, turn the telescreens the other way around and monitor the government instead.

Hardwire the government to the Internet so anyone can log on and monitor their representatatives and everything would change.

Report this

By Johnny Doughey, August 23, 2007 at 11:02 pm Link to this comment

The administration is saying that if Congree does not backdate this current law, the suits might bankrupt the phone companies.  I say that if they were breaking the law, which the administration apparently believes they were, they deserve to be bankrupt.

I can come up with valid excuses for breaking any and all laws I want.  The point is, in this country, which we used to call a democracy, NOBODY is supposed to be above the law!  Bush and his cronies had plenty of time (it had to have taken more than a year or two to set this stuff up) to work with Congress, but he didn’t.  He just did whatever he wanted and is now threatening Congress with the destruction of phone companies if it doesn’t okay this spying.

He and Cheney did the same thing when they decided to attack Iraq.  Let’s just threaten them with WMDs and after we attack, they might look some place where all the inspectors missed and maybe proce our point.  The important thing is that we go ahead and worry about the results later.

WE now have, according to Iraq, about a million dead plus our own.  Remember when Bush, before the war, said Sadaam had killed about 300,000 in the 24 years he was a dictator.  Well, now there’s 3 times that many in only 5 years.  Apparently, we’re much more efficient at killing… IMHO

Report this

By Outraged, August 23, 2007 at 10:48 pm Link to this comment

Maybe everyone should put a camera up in their home and broadcast their lives over youtube.  This way we wouldn’t have to pay for all that expensive equipment to monitor people. Everyone could see what everyone else is doing, and just how mundane most peoples lives really are.  I’d probably get voted the least watched videos EVER!

Report this

By particle61, August 23, 2007 at 2:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

...no scare tactics!?!...then McConnel says “The fact that we’re doing it this way means that some Americans are going to die”

What the law really allows is for the feds to look at all internet and telephone traffic and cherry pick what they want to surveil…what has been alleged in lawsuits is that the government has special rooms inside the routing centers of major phone companies where all data is reviewed using specialized software, let me say that again, all data is routed to these rooms and analyzed.  To me, that sounds very much like casting a broad net and surveilling vast ammounts of private communications- see stories,
Government Spy Agency Chooses AT&T as its Primary Service Provider; and,
Phone Companies Outsource Invasion of Privacy,
these stories and many, many more are in the ‘one nation, under surveillance’ archive-
http://www.redstateupdate.net/1-nation/surveillance.html
and that doesn’t even mention the spaced based privacy invasion techniques that now are used by federal and local law enforcement, see story-
Feds Can Scan Your Face From Outer Space Without Leaving a Trace, at-
http://www.redstateupdate.net/index.html

redstateupdate.net has covered the rise of the national security state in Orange AlertAmerica since 2005 with humor and prescience, and a new gwbush comic every week…

http://www.redstateupdate.net
funny, frightening, free
and “it’s all true’

Report this

By purplewolf, August 23, 2007 at 1:34 pm Link to this comment

does anyone out there really believe that only about 100 or less spied upon are Americans? 100% sounds more like it.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.