LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Merchandise - Gore Vidal signed first editions - Signed Mr. Fish prints
November 14, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

'Daily Show': Hannity's Apocalyptic Apology

Marc Cooper on the Fate of Cesar Chavez's Dream

Where Are the Real Deficit Hawks?

A Response From UFW to Marc Cooper

Getting Out of Afghanistan With Grace

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Fidel Castro Reader

Fidel Castro Reader

by Fidel Castro (Author), David Deutschmann (Editor)
$13.57

Pinochet and Me

Pinochet and Me

By Marc Cooper
$10.40

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

The Penny:  That’s Just Our $.02

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 15, 2007
penny
loringdesign.com

Now that U.S. pennies are more of a nuisance than a useful form of currency, given their ever-so-rapidly evaporating value (no offense, Honest Abe), and now that it costs the government nearly two cents to make each penny, why don’t we just toss them altogether?  (Hint:  It has to do with lobbyists.)


AP via Yahoo!  News:

The nation’s sole supplier of zinc “penny blanks,” Jarden Zinc Products, is lobbying the federal government to protect its interests.

The subsidiary of Rye, N.Y.-based Jarden Corp., paid Baker & Daniels LLP $180,000 in 2006 to fight legislation that would have allowed retailers to round off cash transactions to the nearest nickel, effectively creating a penniless society. Fortunately for Jarden, the House legislation did not gain traction, and its author, Rep. Jim Kolbe, R-Ariz., has since retired.

In the past two weeks, however, bills in the House and Senate were proposed that would give the Treasury Department the power to decide—without congressional approval—the type of metals used for all coins. The bills’ authors said using cheaper metals to make pennies and nickels, which incidentally cost an estimated 10 cents each to produce, could save taxpayers $100 million annually.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Chrome Bag - Free Shipping

Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Frank, August 16, 2007 at 2:29 pm #

Who care how if it costs two cents to manufacture a penny? One value has nothing to do with the other.  If a penny could only be used once and that had to be tossed away, that might be a valid talking point. In reality, the penny’s utility in commerce is worth immeasurably more than it’s face value.  Think of all the thousands of times a typical penny will change hands during it’s service life, each time facilitating a transaction which supports the economy.

Report this

By DennisD, August 16, 2007 at 11:36 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

“It costs the government nearly two cents to make each penny, why don’t we just toss them altogether?  (Hint:  It has to do with lobbyists.)”

When you have a decision made in D.C. that doesn’t involve the lobbyists let me know. That would truly be news.

Report this

By Novista, August 16, 2007 at 11:14 am #

I read somewhere that $60 of pennies and nickels cost $100 to manufacture. And somewhere else, now a restriction against sending them out of country. Scrap metal recycling apparently paid a premium of that core currency.

The land of oz ditched pennies and two-cent coins (gasp!) quite some time ago.

A 1912 dollar is now , well as of 2006, worth $0.05 using adjusted CPI and $0.01 using nominal CDP per capital. LOL.

When the ‘asset securitization’ house of cards collapses, the current dollar will probably have a value of about three current cents. Yeah. So why did I choose 1912? Year before the Federal Reserve scam initiated.

Report this

By Doug, August 16, 2007 at 10:11 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

“...why don’t we just toss them altogether?  (Hint:  It has to do with lobbyists.)”.

To be fair, it may also be due to fears the marketeers may round the remaining difference up rather than down. grin

Report this

By jhm, August 16, 2007 at 8:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

When this idea was raised before, one of the rationales given for keeping the penny was that many of the Several States, and even localities within them, had established sales taxes the levying of which would be compromised by the penny’s absence.  For example, if I wanted to levy an 8% sales tax on somebody’s $1.00 purchase, but had to round to a nickel, who would pay the difference? would the purchaser pay an extra 2¢ or the purchasee eat a 3¢ differential?  This would only matter for cash purchases, but having a bias toward non-cash purchases itself leads to problems.

Report this

By C.P.T.L., August 15, 2007 at 11:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s important to not lose the Penny just as it’s important to NOT allow a dollar coin; both would engender an immense symbolic devaluation of our money that will be played out to our disadvantage. Two cents for every one is a healthy price to pay to keep the concept of the Penny alive. Cancel a missile system if you’re worried about money, it’s just going to kill someone. Cancel five missile systems, there’s tons of them.

The problem with the Penny is solved by figuring out how to revive its value, same with the dollar - that is fixing a problem. Dropping the Penny altogether is rolling over and dying.

As soon as the Penny is gone watch how fast the nickel becomes worthless, and so on with an ugly knock-on effect taken full advantage of by Suits of Prey. Same with the dollar once it becomes a coin, fives will be next.

Europe has a long tradition of coinage that America does not have; and Americans, frankly, just plain aren’t up to the complexity of the change and standing up for themselves. This age of cheating, gouging, inside deals, price fixing and trickery, these times when Americans cannot seem to keep their basic concepts straight (spy on me to keep me safe!) are NOT the times to be making core changes to our money.

When we have government that we can half-way trust and can investigate, to our satisfaction, the hidden half, then let’s consider possible changes.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.


 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.