#95357 by Douglas Chalmers on 8/16 at 5:05 am
• Oh, Laura Bush? I wouldn’t feel safe with THAT walking behind me, cyrena! Have you seen her eyes?!?! Just as well he has arms like a gorilla to fend her off with, duh.
Doug,
Yeah, I’ve taken note of her from time to time. But, the really scary one, (including the eyes) is Lynne Cheney. Now SHE even scares ME.
But Laura? No…she’s been Stepfordized for so long that she hasn’t been “with us” in decades. And now, with what is obviously a diet of prozac/jack-backed cocktails, she’s pretty much just floating on down the road. Hell, she might even be on an IV by now. I know I would be. (Then again, probably not, since I’d never have allowed myself to get hooked up with that bunch to begin with.)

Still, imagine if you were trapped in that hell of a life, and didn’t have the guts to get out? Or worse, were too stupid to know that you were even trapped?

Pretty pathetic.

#95348 by cyrena on 8/16 at 4:17 am: “...Just flipped over from the glass ceiling thread .......they haven’t liked her from the beginning, because she’s a strong PERSON, and “women” are NOT supposed to be strong, intelligent, or speak out of turn. They are supposed to be like Laura Bush, who generally walks a few steps behind the shrub....” ------>

Oh, Laura Bush? I wouldn’t feel safe with THAT walking behind me, cyrena! Have you seen her eyes?!?! Just as well he has arms like a gorilla to fend her off with, duh.

#Quote cyrena:  “...and generally very insecure in their own alleged “masculinity”. Most importantly, they DON’T CHANGE. So, the changing of circumstances, or the changing of anything in the political dynamics of our society, doesn’t matter to them. They don’t like Hillary. They can never tell you WHY.” ------->

I don’t understand them either, ha ha. Evolutionary failures....... (inseminoids!) maybe just the ‘drones’ of the species. You can usually tell at a glance just by the way they dress, uhh.

#Quote cyrena:  “...Outraged called it much better in respect to Dana Perino. She’s simply a LIAR. I wanted to jump right through the computer when I read the bullshit about the senior drug discount. In reality, that very costly program has ended up costing seniors MORE, and in some cases, REDUCING the availability of certain medications. The premiums on this nifty little plan have more than doubled, and they cover far less of the price of the prescriptions....” -------->

Its all being taken away by stealth. See http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php – stop “Codex Alimentarius” http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp

#95170 by Lucien BONNET on 8/15 at 12:05 pm: “Lucien Bonnet’s thesis is intended to show that black is not only an integral part of the light process but the true synthesis of it....???”

Nice try, LB - but, as much as we love Haiti, we’re NOT here to buy condos. And you’re addressing your stuff to the wrong “president Clinton” if you want to be relevant in the here and now.

Just flipped over from the glass ceiling thread, after hearing from Douglas, that Hillary was taking a beating from a handful of male bloggers. Shame on them, but it’s not surprising. Because, over the years, the same people, have made the same comments, (the names or faces may change slightly, but the mentality is the same) and rarely, if ever, can they provide any clear rationale, or apply the same “standard” to any male opponent. In other words, they haven’t liked her from the beginning, because she’s a strong PERSON, and “women” are NOT supposed to be strong, intelligent, or speak out of turn. They are supposed to be like Laura Bush, who generally walks a few steps behind the shrub.

So, Hillary speaks up, (as she always has) and that is a guarantee for types like this, to jump. They always do. They’re bigots, misogynists, and generally very insecure in their own alleged “masculinity”. Most importantly, they DON’T CHANGE. So, the changing of circumstances, or the changing of anything in the political dynamics of our society, doesn’t matter to them. They don’t like Hillary. They can never tell you WHY.

So, we get stuff like this, from Will:

• #95059 by W i l l on 8/15 at 6:29 am
(5 comments total)
Someone should remind the she-fop that she isn’t running against a lame duck President.
And then remind her campaign staff, Senator Clinton is part of that government she claims doesn’t care about the people.

Now seriously, why does the “she-fop”? (whatever the hell THAT is) need to be “reminded” that she isn’t running against a -lame duck president-? Is this a stupid comment or what? Of COURSE she’s not running against a lame duck president. George IS a lame duck president, because he always has been (at least a puppet president) but she’s not “running against him”. So, what’s up with that? She’s running as a democrat in a presidential campaign/election, and at this point, she’s competing with both democrats and republicans. Eventually, (if the process is allowed to continue as it traditionally has) she will run against a Republican. We don’t yet know who. But nobody in the real world believes that she’s running against lame duck shrub, who we can’t get rid of soon enough anyway.

So, this is the kind of stuff I mean. These are the types that just have a real hair up their asses about Hillary. If Britney Spears or any of those types were running, they’d vote for them in a red neck second, (which is still way longer than a New York minute, but they’d manage to mark that X somewhere close to the box – especially if her photo was there next to her name).

Meantime, while Hillary displays strength and a willingness to call a spade a spade, (and she pretty much always has, I should mention, even back when she was the First Lady) we have the likes of Dana Perino, and that other dimwit Frances Townsend. (or close enough). Between these two, I might actually expect to hear some legitimate complaints about “she-flops” or such, even though Outraged called it much better in respect to Dana Perino. She’s simply a LIAR. I wanted to jump right through the computer when I read the bullshit about the senior drug discount. In reality, that very costly program has ended up costing seniors MORE, and in some cases, REDUCING the availability of certain medications. The premiums on this nifty little plan have more than doubled, and they cover far less of the price of the prescriptions.

And of course she’s correct about the shrub’s administration keeping our troops and all the rest of the misery here at home, under wraps and unacknowledged. How obvious is that, to anyone who can connect the shortest distance between two points? We’ve heard nothing but LIES from these people for 7 years. Why do so many choose to stay in denial on that?

I can only guess that they just cannot exist outside their little fabricated bubbles…truth speaks, (from the mouth of a woman no less) and it freaks them out.

<----Libertarian
If I was neocon, it’d not have been constructive criticism.
Irrespective, Senator Clinton is a dirty sanke in the grass.

Someone should remind the she-fop that she isn’t running against a lame duck President.
And then remind her campaign staff, Senator Clinton is part of that government she claims doesn’t care about the people.

At least when the Dimwits in the White House attack her Hillary strikes back. Seems sad that one of the few Democrats with b*lls is a woman. It is a good commercial and the White House dimwits should have ignored it.

It is my humble opinion that it is obviouss that troops and struggling families are invisible to congess as well, which makes Hillary a hypocrite.  In fact, it’s invisibility and anonymity that makes our so-called democracy work so well.

Re: Article quote: “White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino initially declined to comment on the ad, but then lambasted the spot and the senator.”

Poor, poor ignorant Dana Perino.  She’s lying again.  Dana, have you questioned even one senior citizen to see how that “prescription drug plan” is working out for them.  You ignoramus.  Still spewing the lies, but Dana, like I said, everybody, EVERYBODY KNOWS WHO YOU ARE!

So everytime you get up there and get “rattled” consider it nothing. Wait till you see what “they” have in store for you.  Dana, you’re like the “new” girlfriend of the wife beater who thinks’ “but he wouldn’t treat ME like that, of course he does it to her!” I suggest a little “heart to heart” with Tony Snow, he knows what the score is.  Little girl, wake up and smell the coffee.

#94951 by Non Credo on 8/14 at 7:33 pm: “...Let me tell you, that is one powerful ad. Her humanity really shines through. When I saw it, I thought, my God, maybe she hasn’t lost her soul after all....”

I think you are right after all, Non Credo. This is the 2007 version of “the new deal” and its no longer useful discussing why Bush-Cheney lied, etc etc, ad infinitum any more. This is a time of going forward to actually redressing the problems we will all be left with when the present incumbent finally and thankfully retires......

Quote Yahoo: Hillary - “Apparently I’ve struck a nerve. The White House just attacked me a few minutes ago,” Clinton said. “Not only have I said it and am saying it, I will keep saying it because I happen to believe it.” .......Calling herself an optimistic and modern progressive who would help the nation overcome economic disparities, Clinton said the U.S. can “grow” its economy amid global competition “and do it in a way that benefits all Americans.” .......

Clinton said the Bush administration “is working for Americans with incomes at the very top.” ....."Americans work harder than anyone else in the world, yet we’re not getting rewarded,” she said. “We’re seeing a growing gap between the haves and have-nots that threatens the backbone of our country, the middle class that built our country....”

See the “Invisible” video at http://www.youtube.com/user/hillaryclintondotcom

QuyTran

How about impeachment on the table, that works for me!

Not tough enough ! We need more !

At some point this campaign is going to have to turn into party versus party. Normally you expect that to start right after the nominating conventions, but this is also part of the campaign for the nomination. Personally I can’t see anything wrong with telling like it is.

joanarc,

You mentioned referring to Hillery running against the Republicans.

“They are already rubbing their palms in glee about the very idea”.

Thats not glee, it is static electricity from the hair on their palms. Sorry, I could not help myself.
All the Republicans running for office could attend a KKK meeting and fit right in without the sheets.

I have admired Hillary for a long time. I think she is smart and tough and compassionate, and being a woman myself, I would like to see a woman president. But I do not think she should be our candidate for 08. The Republicans would make her presidency hellish for her and America. They would nullify any good she might try to do. They are already rubbing their palms in glee about the very idea.

This is one of the few times I have heard Hillery say something that I agree with, now lets work on the rest of the things.

ANYONE REMEMBER LAURA BUSH KILLING HER EX BOYFRIEND IN A CAR WRECK...NO CHARGES FILED, ???WHY I WONDER ????

JUST AS ANN RICHARDS SAID, POOR GEORGE, HE WAS BORN WITH A SILVER SPOON IN HIS MOUTH, OR MAYBE SOMEWHERE ELSE...HOW CAN HE OR HIS CRONIES COMPLAIN ABOUT ANYONE ????? GOOD FOR HER, KEEP IT UP....THE NEXT DRINK GEORGIE TAKES MAY NOT BE NEAR BEER.......