LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 29, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

India May Hold the Whip Hand in Dubai Power Game

Fred Branfman on 'The Making of an Elder Culture'

Purloined E-Mails Don't Change the Facts

Colbert Conservatives and Military Waste

Understanding Our Hollow 'Centrists'

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Motherhood Manifesto

Motherhood Manifesto

By Joan Blades and Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner
$8.97

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Democrats to Bush: Veto This!

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 2, 2007

Defying President Bush’s promise to veto the bill, House Democrats approved a broad expansion of the popular SCHIP program that would offer healthcare coverage to millions more poor children. The Senate version appears likely to pass, which would force Bush to make good on his vow and in the process deny poor children fiscally responsible healthcare.


AP:

A bipartisan measure to add 3 million lower-income children to a popular health insurance program headed for a final Senate vote after a much broader and more expensive version passed the House over stiff Republican opposition.

Both measures face a veto threat from President Bush, who says they would cost too much and expand the decade-old program beyond its original mission, inappropriately moving toward government-run health care.

Senate Democrats were eager to pass a $35-billion expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, perhaps as early as Thursday, before leaving town this week for a monthlong summer recess. The program expires Sept. 30.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Democrats to Bush: Veto This!

Next item: Democrats to Bush: Veto This!



Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By farmertx, August 2, 2007 at 4:59 pm #

#91744 by cyrena on 8/02 at 12:38 pm
(614 comments total)

So, I’m not sure it does a whole lot of good for me to write, but I still keep doing it.

Granted, it would be more effective if we enclosed a check for $250,000 with the plea for responsible action, but I’m just a tad short right, thanks to the booming economy.
Still, we have to keep trying.

Report this

By cyrena, August 2, 2007 at 4:38 pm #

#91660 by farmertx on 8/02 at 6:57 am

•  More useless gestures from Congress. Even if Shrub signs the bill, he will add a signing statement that will nulify the bill.
This is exactly what he would do, farmertx.
•  Until he is removed, nothing will be done to help this country.
And, the longer we wait, the more damage is done. That’s what’s so amazing to me, when I hear another excuse for Nancy Pelosi, or this Congress. (not to mention the fact that it thoroughly pisses me off).
•  Again, I hope all of us are writing our Congress Critter’s saying something similar.
Well yeah, I’ve been writing. Mine is probably pretty strong, because there’s no excuse now, for the fact that they have not initiated these impeachment proceedings, or ended the war. For years now, the Dems have had the excuse that they were outnumbered. And, they were.

However, in the past 6 years, Pelosi has also been keeping a firm lid on any disagreement within her own party, including any mention of impeachment. So, now the excuses don’t work, because we see that she won’t even consider it, because it would be politically incorrect, in a function that she sees as being about HER, and not about US.

So, I’m not sure it does a whole lot of good for me to write, but I still keep doing it.

Report this

By mackTN, August 2, 2007 at 12:14 pm #

If Dems would only add an amendment stating that the beneficiaries of this program would have to work 10 hours a week helping farmers harvest crops, Bush would certainly embrace this bill.  It would also ameliorate the illegal immigration problem at the same time, not to mention helping these children of poor parents that they have to develop a work ethic, pull themselves up by the bootstrap, etc.

Report this

By farmertx, August 2, 2007 at 10:57 am #

More useless gestures from Congress. Even if Shrub signs the bill, he will add a signing statement that will nulify the bill.

Until he is removed, nothing will be done to help this country.

Again, I hope all of us are writing our Congress Critter’s saying something similar.

Report this

By Miguel Nieto, August 2, 2007 at 8:20 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

If the killing of Iraqi children by our American forces has no effect on Bush’s conscience (like as if he has one), then why would he care about the death of non-white poor children dying of something that wealthy white kids can get immediate and effective treatment for.
Bush’s veto (as well as how those voting against this bill) shows their true nature, and loyalty the private profit hungry medical establishment.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.