LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 13, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Occupy Draws Strength From the Powerless

White Nationalists Share Spotlight With GOP at CPAC

More About the Man Bankrolling Santorum

A 'Queer History' of Rick Santorum and Proposition 8

Contraception and the Cost of Culture Wars

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Political Divide

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
The Last Days of Democracy

The Last Days of Democracy

By Elliot D. Cohen
$12.38

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

The Brand-a-Baby Biz

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Jun 25, 2007
baby
AP Photo/Tina Fineberg

From $50 for a list of suggestions to $475 for a numerologist to test the positive and negative associations of a certain name, the baby name business is booming.  Sociologists and name researchers are reporting an increase in the level of stress that parents-to-be experience when choosing baby names.

Adding to the pressure are celebrities whose baby monikers read like bad science fiction or trendy cocktail names (see Pilot Inspektor Riesgraf-Lee and Apple Martin, respectively).  Naming a baby can be like branding a product: Parents want their children to stand out without being too trendy.


WSJ.com:

Celebrities (think Apple Martin, Shiloh Jolie-Pitt and Pilot Inspektor Riesgraf-Lee) are helping to drive up the pressure. And the growing brand consciousness among consumers has made parents more aware of how names can shape perceptions. The result: a child’s name has become an emblem of individual taste more than a reflection of family traditions or cultural values. “We live in a marketing-oriented society,” says Bruce Lansky, a former advertising executive and author of eight books on baby names, including “100,000 + Baby Names.” “People who understand branding know that when you pick the right name, you’re giving your child a head start.”
Read more

 

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By peedeecee, June 26, 2007 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment

I like C Quil’s idea of not naming kids for the location where they were conceived—we’d have kids named “‘57 Ford Back Seat,” “Quickie Motel,” “Behind the Filing Cabinets,” and (my personal fave) “Business Class.”

Report this

By noodle, June 26, 2007 at 2:27 pm Link to this comment

When my wife and I married in Italy 1n 1961, we were given a little booklet with space for the names of 13 children we might have. A cautionary note said we were not allowed to give our children names that would hold them up to ridicule in later life. One man, for example, tried to name his child “odiolaguerra” (I hate war), and it was not allowed. Although we agreed with his sentiments, we felt it would have been highly improper to so label a kid. I feel the same way about some of the painful and outlandish names people are now imposing on infants who can’t fight back.

Report this

By great_satan, June 26, 2007 at 1:58 pm Link to this comment

Here’s what the wizard of acid has to say:
http://www.thebear.org/essays2.html#anchor515747

Report this

By RYS, June 26, 2007 at 12:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Gee Whatever happened to people just taking a name?  Most of the people I know don’t use their legal one much anyway.

Report this

By C Quil, June 26, 2007 at 7:31 am Link to this comment

Just give your kids they won’t be mortifed about when they grow up. No weird spellings, no celebrities, no cutsie-wootsie ones, no naming them after the places where they were conceived. The last, especially, is likely to do them lasting psychological harm - especially if you tell them the origin of the name.

So - no Kaytelynne or Gerromme, no Paris, Elvis or Puff Daddy, no Kryckette, and definitely no Denver, Sheboygan, Chicago or Vegas.

Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, June 26, 2007 at 5:01 am Link to this comment

Image is everything; look at our gov.‘s manipulation of language.  How about the word “spin?”  One word can and often does change everything with a population so aurally sensitive.  Why wouldn’t a kid’s name be similarly crafted?  The really smart people are the ones cashing in on this idiotic phenomenon.

Report this

By DennisD, June 25, 2007 at 7:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Has the rest of world signed on to this mind numbing crap or are America’s empty heads once again leading the planet as only we can.

Report this

By peedeecee, June 25, 2007 at 7:32 pm Link to this comment

From the article: “People who understand branding know that when you pick the right name, you’re giving your child a head start.”


Puh-leeze. What a manipulative crock of sh*t that is, stated by someone who wants to cash in on the latest breathlessly inane trend.

Report this

By TDoff, June 25, 2007 at 7:25 pm Link to this comment

McCain’s campaign committee tried to jump aboard this baby-name trend by offering $100 to any family that would name their baby after John.

But so far, ‘Dumfuk’ and ‘Luzer’ don’t seem to be catching on.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.