LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.  
 
July 23, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports
No Easy Out for Obama
 * NEW! * Refighting the Vietnam War
 * NEW! * The Starbucks Economy

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Kandahar District Falls Briefly to Taliban

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jun 19, 2007

Afghan forces retook a district in Kandahar province that had been captured by the Taliban. The Afghan forces said they had made a tactical decision to withdraw, but the Taliban said it captured the district outright after days of battle. Either way, the former ruling fundamentalists of Afghanistan appear less than beaten.

BBC:

Afghan forces earlier made a tactical withdrawal from Myanishen.

But another district, Ghorak, has fallen to the insurgents, Kandahar’s police chief has told the BBC.

Correspondents say the militants have taken a number of districts over the past couple of years but have managed to keep control of only one.

Read more

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Sir Salman's Knighthood Triggers Backlash

Next item: Thou Shalt Not Exceed the Speed Limit

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Marshall, June 21, 2007 at 9:31 pm #

So Mike - rather than making ad hominem attacks… can you just answer my question?  Should we have invaded Pakistan as well? Or should I give up on the idea of rational discussion with you?

Report this

By Marshall, June 20, 2007 at 11:15 pm #

#79783 by Mike Mid-City on 6/20 at 4:58 pm

Mike - I’m not sure how the Taliban regrouping in Pakistan and Cashmere and attempting to make a comeback is Bush’s fault.  Are you saying we should have invaded Pakistan as well?

Report this

By Fed Up, June 20, 2007 at 2:27 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

What everyone forgets about Afghanistan is the “deal” that Dick Cheney’s buddies proposed to the Taliban when they were hosted by Unocal in Houston well before 9-11. “You can have a carpet of bombs or a carpet of gold.” This was in response to the natural gas pipeline that was proposed to go from the Caspian basin through Afghanistan to the Indian Ocean to supply Enrons multi billon dollar plant that was built in India. No natural gas-no money for Enron. The Taliban was being pressured to give up a deal they already made with an Argentinian company to build the pipeline. Dick Cheney and his cronies at Haliburtan tried to strong arm the situation so that the pipeline would be built by Unocal. This had to really piss off the Taliban. Well, lo and behold--9-11 came about and this was a great excuse to invade. Hamid Karzai was installed in the puppet government that was set up and guess what!--Like magic, the pipeline was built and controlled by everyone that had an interest in all the money to be made from this situation. And guess what else-Karzai was a former Unocal consultant. All of them war profiteers! I feel bad for the Afghan people, but we never would have been there in the first place, if multinational oil companies had no interest in the region. We would have gone in and taken Osama and his boys out in a Special Ops. Read all about it:http://www.counterpunch.org/tomenron.html

Report this

By Marshall, June 20, 2007 at 11:15 am #

#79640 by Mike Mid-City on 6/20 at 10:39 am

Mike - thanks for your well thought out and documented opinion.  You’ve got me convinced.

Report this

By Marshall, June 19, 2007 at 7:29 pm #

#79403 by Mike Mid-City on 6/19 at 7:04 pm

Well Mike, as soon as you show me proof, rather than your opinion, that the war in Iraq prevented the US from being effective in Afghanistan (which, btw, it was - we routed the Taliban in record time)… then maybe you’ll have a point.  Then explain why, if the problem is troop numbers, that NATO hasn’t provided more.

And answer me as honestly as you’re capable of on this one: are you suggesting the US send more troops to Afghanistan?

Report this

By DennisD, June 19, 2007 at 7:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

And I thought this was the war we already “won”. Just another merger and acquisition gone bad for Bu$h Inc.
And by the way Marshall, this isn’t a NATO failure this is a Bu$h Inc. failure under the guise of NATO. Or did you forget who controls and really is NATO and has been since it’s creation. History has either been a very poor teacher for you or you a very poor student.
Russia, Afghanistan - utter failure, deja vu.

Report this

By Marshall, June 19, 2007 at 6:29 pm #

So Dale and Mike - it sounds like you’re rooting for NATO failure in Afghanistan?

Report this

By Dale Headley, June 19, 2007 at 11:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t understand.  All those trustwothy journalists on Fox News keep saying that everything is going wonderfully well in Afghanistan- that we are almost ready to declare victory.  Of course, that is predicated on the fact that we are killing more Afghanis every day; you know, children and all.

Report this

By Hammo, June 19, 2007 at 6:10 am #

The fundamentalist and puritanical philosophies of certain groups and mindsets around the world seem to play a part in some social, political and military activities.

Young men are looking for certain things in life ... adventure, rites of manhood and other important experiences. Being a warrior is one of these. And, there are others.

Food for thought in the article ...

Make love, not jihad: PSYOP, OSINT efforts should tackle repression of romance

PopulistAmerica.com
Populist Party of America

http://www.populistamerica.com/make_love__not_jihad

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.