Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 20, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

Sen. Elizabeth Warren's Supreme Court Warning

Warren Opposes Obama Nominee, Lawmaker Urges Gender-Role Class for Kids, and More

Quelle Surprise! Haiti on the Mend

The Terror Con

Most Comments
Most Emailed




The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
The Divine Comedy

The Divine Comedy

By Dante Alighieri
$21.57

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Moore Pays Foe’s Health Bills

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on May 18, 2007
moore
AP Photo / Chitose Suzuki

Michael Moore isn’t getting much credit from the critic whose family he helped.

Michael Moore is enjoying major buzz at the Cannes Film Festival for his new film, “Sicko,”  about the U.S. healthcare system.  Meanwhile, one of his staunchest detractors has discovered that the anonymous benefactor who paid off his sick wife’s $12,000 yearly medical insurance bill was none other than the documentary filmmaker.


Rush & Molloy:

We can now confirm to Kenefick that his secret benefactor is none other than the dreaded, detestable, loathsome Michael Moore.

Moore didn’t contact us. We heard it on our own. Yesterday, his reps said they couldn’t reach the director, who is in France getting ready for tomorrow’s screening at Cannes of his new movie, “Sicko.”

One friend of Moore’s did say, “We sure are happy Jim’s wife received the care she needed.”

Kenefick admitted the $12,000 “was like manna from heaven at that time. ... My business was almost dead, my wife was very, very ill, and I was racking up a few little health problems of my own. That money made it possible for us to begin to turn our lives around.”

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By RodneyWelch, May 19, 2007 at 5:18 pm Link to this comment

For me, personally, the issue has nothing to do with Michael Moore or the Health Care industry. I just sympathize with anyone who suddenly feels owned by someone else, or dependent on them in some way, especially someone you don’t like. It’s gotta hurt.

Report this

By martin weiss, May 19, 2007 at 2:26 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There is a valuable lesson here. The reason Mike made “Fahrenheit 411” was not for personal gain, but because he knows we are all in this together. Without the truth—and unless we are a nation of laws, not wealth, we all have nothing.

He was probably surprised at the money he made, because his work is not for personal gain, and that’s what makes it so valuable.

Wealth has power, indisputably. Wealth made kings and lesser “nobles” throughout history, until the people founded America. Our government was created to eliminate the power of wealth to dominate and enslave. First it was the Hudson’s Bay Company, then King George III, then the railroads, the oil companies and now genetics, pharmaceuticals, insurance companies who will always seek to influence government for profit.

The republican party has been the party of wealth since Lincoln’s death. When President Teddy Roosevelt, a republican, tried to bust the trusts, limit the huge monopolies that dominated government and people’s lives, the republicans abandoned him as their candidate for re-election.

Now Mike comes along, sees the same deceptions and unfair practices, and says so. He is saying we can do better- we are being taken for a ride. This is a country founded for the people, not for corporations to dominate.

Essentially, this is a Christian message. Unlike the Christians who claim the only way to grace is through their churches, Mike shows that the people have many roads to the truth. The great enduring strength of Christianity is it’s humanity and ethicality, not in amassing the wealth of the church in Rome. America is the same. The innovations of millions of free people will always trump the chains that banks and corporations will foist upon them.

The people of America are an inexorable and indomitable force. That’s why democracy has the chance to endure against the forces of wealth. That’s why Christian charity and compassion will always outlast the latest little religious tyrant, like Falwell. That’s why it’s important for folks like Mike to get the truth out about what the forces of wealth are trying to do to the people.

Sometimes the truth is hard to stand. Like the “war” in Iraq is simply murder for profit. Like the entire oil industry is an illegal monopoly. It’s the oil industry that’s principally responsible for putting millions of us in jail for smoking pot. Because hemp oil would break the petroleum monopoly.

It is not just Mike’s recent payment of his critic’s bills, but his entire dedication to the working class, to the people, to the truth, to compassion and decency and democracy that distinguishes his work as well as his Christianity.
marty weiss
mexico, mo

Report this

By namvet67, May 19, 2007 at 1:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The debated shouldn’t be about Moore’s character and his personal actions. We should be debating his art. Or some may want to say, his product. Either way, he has packaged his work in an easy to see and understand way. His film is a reflection of our society. Just like Picasso and his Guernica. We may tolerate what he is showing us, but we get especially irritated when he’s asking us to answer his question. In “Bowling” he asked why are there so many guns in America? In “Fahrenheit” he asked why is America at war in Iraq? In SICKO he asks why is our health care system so horrible? The sad thing is that all the answers remain the same, partly because of the refusal of America to address the issues he raises. But you will find the same culprits, with the same motives, and getting the same results, in all his films. In Guernica, Picasso showed us the result of wars. Moore is trying to show more of a process. How did Guernica happen? That someone could delude themselves into believing Moore is a threat to America, and his art not worth looking seriously at, could only happen in the United Stares of Everything.
Hoa binh

Report this

By DennisD, May 19, 2007 at 1:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Mike - keep on doing what you do best, shaking up the establishment and their corporate interests. We’ve become a nation conditioned not to think through any issue, only respond to sound bites in between commercials. It’s the way our government and their controlling interests want to keep us.
Anything that interferes with their control will be quickly put down.
Much like Fahrenheit 911 this film should be considered mandatory viewing by anyone that wants to be informed. They can then draw their own conclusions and opinions and act accordingly. 
We pay the most for health care coverage in the world and don’t even get the best care. Why? No one in Congress cares - that should be the question - not why did Michael Moore pay for someone else’s health care costs?  Wake up!

Report this

By Dale Headley, May 19, 2007 at 11:13 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It has always struck me that nowhere in any of the criticisms of Michael Moore’s films has anyone actually been able to point to anything that was’t true, perhaps because, as most of them admit, they haven’t even seen the film.  The fact is, they hate him precisely BECAUSE he tells the truth.

Report this

By anonymous, May 19, 2007 at 8:04 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Michael Moore has spent his life helping himself & his family by trying to ruin people who screw the little guy.  Kenefick owed Moore long before he had to accept charity from him.
 
I’m not saying it’s his fault but, his opinions about Moore might show a mental deficiency that is related to his inability to make a good living.

He might be better off getting a job and spending less time playing with his computer.

Report this

By KISS, May 19, 2007 at 8:00 am Link to this comment

I think Michael Moore has one-hell-of a sense of humor. And Rodney,How do you perceive that all will change on a paltry donation of 12 grand? It is obvious you do not like Michael and that is fine, just be critical on the issues that you know about. Knee jerk criticisms are seldom correct. Or are you somehow compensated from the Health Industry?

Report this

By Davian, May 18, 2007 at 11:59 pm Link to this comment

As long as corporate “news”(sic) fails to abide by the principles of journalism, the resulting vaccuum of essential truth will be, inevitably, the urgent priority of the citizens who still believe in the concept of democracy.

That our government would consider confiscating the truth underscores the thin edge, upon which, the last vestiges of our democracy is poised.

We need more of Moore, who perplexes the neocons no end.

Report this

By rowdy, May 18, 2007 at 11:47 pm Link to this comment

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America has already issued a statement attacking Moore’s record.

“A review of America’s health care system should be balanced, thoughtful and well-researched,” the statement said. “You won’t get that from Michael Moore.

“Michael Moore is a political activist with a track record for sensationalism. He has no intention of being fair and balanced,” it said.

someone please tell me the answer to this. with an unelected ass hole running the country, a war that was started based on outright lies,billions of dollars wasted,given to halliburton and other bush supporters,constant lies about every aspect of the bush machine, why,oh why, should michael moore even make a pretense of being balanced? one can only hope that moore’s new film will spark outrage in the masses. mike is making a frontal assault on one of the industries that has members of both parties in it’s pocket. mike may be considered by some to be a leftist nut case,but just like all the other progressives blogging on the web, he goes where no man has gone before. i loathe going out to the googleplex,refuse to sit in a hot smelly auditorium,with fools blabbing on their cellphones,shoving popcorn and soda’s in their collective faces and generally spoiling the movie. however i have made it a point to see his last 2 movies in just such a setting so as to help his box office receipts,to show my support of what he has to say. his only critics are the people he goes after,they all have exposed jugular veins and flail about trying to protect themselves.

Report this

By Louise, May 18, 2007 at 10:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

One sure-fire way to NEVER shut up a critic is to respond to him ... in any way.

Seems to me if Moore was going to bribe the man, he would have let him know ... Duh.

The fact remains, we still don’t know for a fact that Moore is the benefactor. Before we hang the man lets wait and see, OK? I mean the guy has enough detractors already. Although personally, if he is the benefactor, I think that’s a darn nice thing to do.

Amazing how people get their knickers in a twit over someone who takes what no-one wants to do anything about and brings it to their attention.

The most vehement of Moore’s critics have probably never even seen one of his documentaries. Proving you cant force the monkeys hands off their eyes, ears and mouths.

Report this

By got2talk, May 18, 2007 at 8:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I sit here with mouth agape at the cynicism of Mr. Welch. You ASSUME Mr. Moore intended to be found out eventually. Your obvious bias is almost laughable if it weren’t so sad and destructive. People of generous nature, when in need, understand and accept the help of others. You, on the other hand, simply reflect your own greed and lack of compassion by not being capable of understanding compassion when you see it.
A sad sight.

Report this

By RodneyWelch, May 18, 2007 at 7:44 pm Link to this comment

Sounds to me like Moore was trying to silence a critic.

The fact that Moore didn’t publicize it hardly matters, because he knew it would be known eventually; knew and banked on it, it looks like. It’s easy enough to say Moore was just displaying Christian charity, but come on: what he was really doing was making it very, very hard for a critic to keep up the attack.

Even if Kenefick keeps up the criticism, Moore supporters will say he’s ungrateful, so in the end that $12,000 check from Moore will insure that he always looks like the bigger man. Help out an enemy in times of trouble; that’s a basic Christian tenet, of course, but the intent here seems less Christian than manipulative.

I keep getting the picture of a Mafia don paying off the hospital bills of the wife of an honest cop.

That’s the crippling thing about debt; it can make you dependent on people you can’t stand, people who have nothing to lose by being nice to you, while you on the other hand may be damned if you do and damned if you don’t. It’s especially sad in Kenefick’s case because it wasn’t about him, but his wife. He would have found it hard to turn down even if he had known it was coming from Moore, so Moore had him in a corner.

I think the key thing now is for Kenefick to get in a position, if possible, where he can pay Moore back. Otherwise, that sucker will just be a weight around his neck.

Report this

By jbart, May 18, 2007 at 6:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Farenheit 911 took balls. “Sicko” will probably be of the same ilk. Tell the people the truth. Detractor’s seem to demean any, and all, that differ from their opinion. But they do so, usually, out of ignorance. F. Nietche (sic) was lambasted in his time for his “God is dead” statement. The ignorant sees that as a “stand alone” statement/thought, and choose not to look further. In other words, the statement (in itself) was all they needed to scream (at the time) “Burn him at the stake”!! The following line, in the play, said (I use literal license here)“He is alive in each of us. We are God” !  The tenets of religion include charity & giving & sacrifice. Mr. Moore has exibited this trait, quite well. We, as people, need to be kind/considerate/caring/sacrificing to our fellow man. It’s not religion folks, it’s being a good citizen of the world. And, by his anominity, shows us that he is a good citizen of the world and deserves to hear it. Michael Moore…..way to go !!!!

Report this

By Reverend Dollar, May 18, 2007 at 4:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think Michael Moore just gave a valuable lesson to Right Wing Christian Evangelists what CHRISTIAN CHARITY really means.

For people who go on and on and on about JESUS, they seem to have little compassion for their fellow man.  Though faith can move mountains, it is still as nothing if there is no Charity.

I wonder if they will have even a grain of humility to see what a humane thing was done?

Report this

By Louise, May 18, 2007 at 4:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“Kenefick wants it known that “I’m not an idiot.”

Yes you are sir, on two counts ... actually three.

First:
Anonymous Benefactors like to stay that way. It’s only the “see how good I am” who shout from the roof-tops what they’ve done for someone less fortunate.

Second:
Having received no direct confirmation from Moore himself, you are jumping to a conclusion based on a gossip column.

Is that the same questionable type source you use to gather the information you use to trash him? You may have damaged your own credibility.

Third:
If Moore did in fact help you out, it would hardly be to “use” you. How could he if no-one knew? Although no-one would know better how easily insurance companies can give you the shaft. Maybe that’s why you’ve decided to decide Moore is using you. Maybe you have become accustomed to being used.

Anyway, glad to hear your wife received the care she needed.

Report this

By JohnDWoodSr, May 18, 2007 at 2:59 pm Link to this comment

I gotta admit it—Michael Moore is a better man than I am. He did a very good thing for the wife of someone who has been a voluble critic. I’m not that big a person (but I wish I was). Good on ya, Mike! You must have read the Biblical passage that says “cast your bread upon the doctors”.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.