![]() ![]() |
|
| |
|
Hitchens’ Fiery Send-Off for FalwellPosted on May 16, 2007
Based on his comments to CNN’s Anderson Cooper on the day of the Rev. Jerry Falwell’s death, it looks like author and provocateur Christopher Hitchens (pictured) will have to wait a while to be invited back into President Bush’s inner circle. Hitchens channeled his disdain for religion and for Falwell into one scathing send-off on Cooper’s show.
Previous item: Manhunt Intensifies in Iraq Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Cat, June 11, 2007 at 7:42 pm #
While Falwell had his faults as a christian, he was still a human being. What Hitchens did on television was rude. He even attacked Falwell for his appearance, calling him “ugly”. This is unacceptable, and seems typical of Hitchens’ behavoir. We understand that Falwell preached for the corrupt religious institution, but let us put that aside for his death, and recognize him as a human being, like the rest of us.
Report thisBy Peter RV, May 17, 2007 at 11:48 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hitchens looks desperate to establish his link with the Left he betrayed when he sided with Bush and this very Falwell, to cheer the masacre in Iraq.
Report thisHe attacks God and religion because he hopes to redeem himself with his old Trockyite comarades, so he hoists his Atheism as the only tie left to him.
We can all agree that the World is a litle bit better without Falwell, still, there is something unsavory about attacking a dead corpse especially when you had agreed with it on important issues, whilst it was alive. With a vehemence of a drunk, Hitchen is trying to pass on his own moral and political confusion to the rest.
Hitchen was playing for too long now his favourite role of “enfant terrible”. No signs that he is growing out of his adolescence.
By ugher, May 17, 2007 at 10:09 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Perhaps the blessed passing of Rev. Falwell is a good time to bring up the societal failure that allows such charlatans to gain a following.
For the better part of a century our educational system has failed to teach our children to perceive the critical differences between belief and knowledge. Unable to differentiate them, too many citizens fall victim to the demagoguery of Falwell and his ilk.
Report thisBy ezeques, May 17, 2007 at 8:41 am #
I just read Hitchens latest book, God Is Not Great. Its pretty refreshing after being raised with that Catholic dogma during 8 years of parochial school in Minnesota. I than turned to atheism, skepticism and science in Viet Nam after watching too many Marines killing themselves charging that hill. Although not in my lifetime but Im confident that at some time in the future man will look back at the current major religions as we do ancient mythology today. I’m still an optimist and humanist.
Report thisBy blueshift, May 17, 2007 at 7:55 am #
To dsmith (#70526)
You stated this: “When a woman, supposedly asked Jesus to heal her, as if he could, according to the biblical text Jesus responded, My mission is to address the wickedness of Jews. Gentiles are not worthy of my attention. Where is this written?!? I have been through my Bible many times and am aware of several times where Jesus, who spurned no one, does indeed minister to both Jew and Gentile. (Women also had prominent roles in the earliest church - the first functional ‘Pope’ being, ahem, Mary, not Peter. Look it up - it’s in the Bible.)
My view, as a christian, is that both Hitchens and Falwell were equally (and totally) off base. Many of the pronouncements by wingnuts from either extreme have nothing to do with whatsoever with the mission of Christ to this world. Indeed, Falwell, Robertson, Dobson, Hitchens, et al, are actually cut from the same bolt of cloth. And none of these charlatans deserve our attention or respect.
Report thisBy Lisa Ann, May 17, 2007 at 7:39 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
You may have missed this Reuters piece:
Gay Cartoons Offer Condolences to Family of Falwell
Reuters Wednesday May 17, 10:57 pm ET
SpongeBob SquarePants and Tinky Winky issued a joint statement of
condolences to the family of Reverend Jerry Falwell, the Lynchburg,
Virginia preacher who became the outspoken leader of the Moral Majority, a
Christian fundamentalist group. Falwell died Tuesday, of a presumed heart
abnormality.
Mr. SquarePants and Mr. Winky made their television appearance Wednesday
afternoon, following the popular Nickelodeon children’s show “Slime Across
America”, a favorite of Reverend Falwell and James Dobson, founder of
Focus on the Family.
Mr. SquarePants stated “We gay cartoons want to extend our condolences to
the family of Mr. Falwell. Though we may not have agreed in matters of
public policy, we do agree that the loss of a family member is always
devastating, and Mr. Falwell will be missed by someone.” The purple
Teletubby Tinky Winky then pulled out a small slip of paper from his purse
and read “Uh-oh.”
Also appearing in the public statement of condolence for Reverend Falwell
Report thiswere Tinky Winky’s Teletubby friends, Laa-Laa, Dipsy and Po, representing
the Cartoon Chapter of PFLAGGI, (Parents and Friends of Lesbian, Gay
Graphic Images). SpongeBob’s “friend” Patrick the pink starfish is a
cartoon member of GLEE, (Gays, Lesbians and Everyone Else). SpongeBob and
Patrick held hands and led the group of gay cartoons, friends and families
in a rousing performance of “We Are Family”, dedicated to Reverend
Falwell.
By mutterhals, May 17, 2007 at 7:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
You myopic assbags. You blacklist someone because they happen to disagree with your sanctified opinion. Hitchens is not and has never been a toadie for the Bush clan. While I disagree with his position on the war, I can appreciate how he came to that conclusion and that does not negate his other valid observations.
Report thisBy DS Ellis, May 17, 2007 at 7:09 am #
I’m sure the far right wing and many of Falwell’s followers are going to pouncing all over this one. But if the good ‘Reverend’ Falwell didn’t wait for the rumble to settle and the smoke to clear before blaming the collapse of the Twin Towers on homosexuals and sinners, then Mr. Hitchens certainly has every right to express his opinions before Jerry’s rigor sets in.
However, I’m alarmed at the amount of bile and poison being spewed on these (and other) message boards. We’re supposed to be above that sort of thing, aren’t we? Yes, Mr. Falwell was cruel (he certainly got enough of my Great Grandmother’s money and support), hypocritical and used his power to ensure a tiny minority of people held the majority of the power. But he’s dead now. Let’s analyze and remember the mistakes made that allowed this man to achieve his level of power, pledge not to make them again and move on.
Report thisBy vjack, May 17, 2007 at 5:41 am #
That clip was absolutely beautiful. Hitchens said exactly what needed to be said. Will he be cast as just another angry atheist? Probably, but I think anger is an appropriate response in this case.
Report thisBy Hal, May 17, 2007 at 5:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I stopped paying any attention to Hitchens some time ago because of his insane support for Bush’s war in Iraq, the same war that Falwell also supported. So maybe someone can tell me if Hitchens has changed his mind re Iraq. Has he finally admitted the stupidity of the war, or is he still supporting our insane President and his warmongering associates?
Report thisBy kenoshaMarge, May 17, 2007 at 4:48 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Scary to find myself agreeing with Hitchens about anything and yet here I am. The world is a better place with Fallwell out of it. I loathed him alive and see no reason to change my mind now that he’s dead. And should there really be a God, the not very Reverand Falwell will have some serious “splainin” to do.
Report thisBy dsmith, May 17, 2007 at 4:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hello Mr/Ms Rage.
Jesus did not “Bring salvation to all mankind.” When a woman, supposedly asked Jesus to heal her, as if he could, according to the biblical text Jesus responded, “My mission is to address the wickedness of Jews. Gentiles are not worthy of my attention.”
In other words, Gentiles were dogs who didn’t rate his attention. Rage...can you comprehend that? Jesus thought gentiles were not worthy of salvation. O.K?
Report thisBy shemp333, May 17, 2007 at 1:36 am #
Hey rage,
Report thisThat has to be one of the most insane, nonsensical rants I have ever read. Do not pass go, go directly to the asylum. AND I love the WAY you go and CAPITALIZE words you imagine are IMPORTANT. Jesus loves you. (but everyone else thinks you are a moron)
By Saddler, May 16, 2007 at 9:46 pm #
Falwell is about the only opponent around that a raging modernist dinosaur like Hitchens has the intellectual capacity necessary to browbeat.
Report thisBy Mike (FVThinker) Burns, May 16, 2007 at 8:45 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It seems that Hitchens (at least in regard to religion and its purveyors) merely speaks with the voice that many of us have in our head but are too P.C. to articulate.
My condolences to his loved ones, but Falwell’s passing is a benefit to society.
Report thisBy G. Anderson, May 16, 2007 at 8:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
When ever there was an important issue facing this country I could always count on Jerry Falwell to say something completey opposite to common sense and reason…
That he helped elect Reagan, and used Christianity to further his own right wing agenda, should not be held against Christians, or any other religion…
Nor should the failings, of men be used as justification to condem what they believe, or that they don’t believe in anything at all.
We all, each one of us carry inside us enough injury, and vileness that I sometimes wonder how civilization survives at all.
Though it may seem a long way off, death comes to us all, none are immune, no one is safe.
Sometimes when someone dies, we can be comforted because it always seems to happen to someone else. But, we are all part of the same world the same mortality. And all share the same responsibility, the same burden, with one foot in heaven, and the other in hell.
As to Jerry Falwells passing, Amen....
Report thisBy Alejandro, May 16, 2007 at 5:54 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Well; I’d say another one bites the dust as far as the sleaze Falwell goes. But, I can’t quite get what Hitchens is so down on religion for. After all he was certainlly willing to get on the Bush and Chaney bandwagon when it came to selling this illegal war. He must know, that Bush is only following Gods orders in his murderous rampage of the Middle East. Puzzling indeed…
Report thisBy bjtoada, May 16, 2007 at 5:43 pm #
“Each wished he could pick a guitar, because it is a gracious thing. Then the people went to their beds, and the camp was quiet. And the owls coasted overhead, and the coyotes gabbled in the distance, and into the camp skunks walked, looking for bits of food - waddling, arrogant skunks, afraid of nothing.” Steinbeck, “The Grapes of Wrath”
Report thisBy republicanSScareme, May 16, 2007 at 4:25 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I don’t care what Christopher Hitchens thinks about anything. He was a lap-dog toadie for the Bush adminsitration and that’s what matters.
Report thisBy rage, May 16, 2007 at 4:11 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
LOLOL! I am neither a fan for Hitchens nor for Falwell, but that interview with Coop was funny. Hitchens claims there is no GOD, and Falwell lived as though there was no GOD. I know there is a real GOD. That one man does not believe in His Existence and another who claims His NAME does not live up to His calling does not make GOD a figment of human imagination. On the contrary, GOD is much too great to be so minutely reduced.
For me, the truth is that Rev. Falwell spent his entire pastoral career placing an emphatic importance on contentious poltical divisiveness through torturesome Scripture wringing and religious misinformation. The legacy of Falwell’s righteousness and service are his abuse and prostitution of Christ’s Bride, the Church, to the Romish powers that has resulted in the illegitimate birth of the corrupt, mutant religio-political bastardy of christo-fascists born of the whoredom of chruch with state. Jesus is likely not at all pleased with the unfaithfulness of His Bride, her reputation almost irreparably disparaged by recent public disgraces and demonstrated unfaithfulness to Her Lord. Jesus did not die to assure the Bush administration two terms in office for all that Dumya and company have accomplished. Jesus did not die to subvert a woman’s rights over her own body, to demonize all abortions, or to judge, condemn, and kill all homosexuals. Jesus was neither a bigot nor a xenophobic racist. Jesus did not use His Divinity to presume to sway the Romans to assist Him in gaining political authority and establishing His FATHER’s Kingdom here on earth. Jesus did not twist, but rather fulfilled the tenets and promises of the Old Testement to institute the New Testement with His Blood with His Love. Jesus came to make whole what was broken and restore what was lost or taken. Jesus’ mission was to offer All Humanity SALVATION through HIS LOVE because HE loves US ALL.
Rarely did America know Rev. Falwell for that same LOVE. It seemed that Rev. Falwell neither understood nor excercised compassion for others. He held all who were different with contempt, distrust, and suspicion, rarely ever bothering to extend the good news of Salvation to the desperate, the lost, the abandoned, or the hurting. He feared too many much too much to love that perfectly. Instead, Rev. Falwell whored the Bride of the Lord to amass all that he lusted and coveted to himself. Rev. Falwell used his pulpit to pimp Christ’s Bride to the Beasts to be used irreverently that he might build himself an empire upon whose facade he could enscribe the name of Jesus. Never was that the place and purpose of the Bride of Christ. Such a place has compromised her faithfulness to the Lord to Whom she is betrothed.
Now, the world has turned the Church out. The Lord is not pleased. And, we the Church’s true members are vexed and perplexed by this horrendous predicament. Jesus bade Peter three times before He ascended into heaven to feed His Sheep. He still implores those leaders who take upon themselves the responsibility of His Commission to SERVE humanity in His stead to FEED HIS SHEEP. I am left to wonder if it is indeed the real JESUS that these misguided Falwellians truly worship, follow, and serve so diligently.
Report thisBy R.M., May 16, 2007 at 3:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The man died with the “Knowledge of Good and Evil”
(religion) as his province...Minister of Thomas
Road Baptist Church...chancelor and titular head of whatever university that was.
He lived in that tree, offering the fruit of
immortality...if you would just take a bite…
commit...be born again...sign up for the easy,
insured, second-handed way thru life...none of
that rational thinking and due diligence
necessary…
If enough people sign up...we’ll probably get tossed out of the garden again...won’t be pretty next time. With the political power he enlisted
in Bush et al, that process might already be underway.
I was at work in a computer room where a radio
was receiving Falwell’s “Old Time Gospel Hour”.
Not my radio...and I was stuck there. The first
part of the broadcast was about how self reliance
had no place in the upbringing of a Christian child.
Parents should consider the Bible as the sole source
of guidance in these matters. The remaining 45
minutes was how you could donate your estate…
(worldly belongings and your soul) to his university.
The world is a better place for having heard the last from him. Would that it were also the last from his ilk.
Report thisBy James V, May 16, 2007 at 3:37 pm #
Indeed.
I do agree with much of what Mr. Hitchens says in this interview. He really does articulate what I feel is the truth with all of these televangelist-politicians. And a man who showed no civility in life, does not warrant that kind of graciousness at his death. I have no problems whatsoever in speaking so harshly about this horrible person. And Mr. Hitchens comments regarding the impact of these vile and spiteful little hate-mongers on peace in the middle east was very important. Thank you.
But I do have a problem. How exactly does his position on the invasion and occupation of Iraq play into the prospect of peace in the middle east? I can answer that actually… disastrously, that’s how.
Mr. Hitchen may or may not be any more opportunistic than the next guy but he really needs to be made aware that he needs to apply the same intellectual rigor to his own positions and beliefs as he does the charlatans of the world or he, in the end, is no better then them.
Report thisBy James Paper, May 16, 2007 at 3:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I never know Christopher Hitchens was [pro-Bush] before turning [left]? Now I know! And I won’t make Christopher Hitchens a [left-wing or progressive] hero. No way! Are you kidding me!
Good for him to be so candid about Jerry Falwell; but for [progressives] to be “grinning” like a Cheshire cat because Christopher Hitchens seems to be on our side is folly. It is so asinine to think --or even believe-- that progressives/Democratics can’t be religious and believe in [God]? Sure, many liberals don’t “subscribe” nor believe in Jerry Falwell’s philosophy; BUT MANY LIBERALS/DEMOCRATICS ARE CHRISTIAN.
And of course, many Christian liberals are not right-wing, Republicans, neo-cons, rabid, people. Even many Christians who always vote Democratics don’t necessarily listen to Limbaugh, Hannity, O’Reilly, Ann Coulter, Savage, etc., etc.
Christopher Hitchens doesn’t believe in god? He is against god? He’s against all religion? Even Christianity?
Big Whup!!!He doesn’t speak for [me] and [I] won’t be shaking Christopher Hitchens’ hands because he candidly and intellectually spoke about Jerry Falwell’s religion and beliefs.
Let me quote TruthSeeker who wrote above:...Hitchins is nothing but an opportunist making fame and a buck depending on the mood of the nation...Complete fake…
Report thisBy TruthSeeker, May 16, 2007 at 2:22 pm #
I disliked Falwell as much as any thinking person, and of course much of what Hitchins says is spot on. However, can you see which way the wind blows, because good old Chris sure can.
After supporting the immoral and illegal war, and blowing with the neocon winds, jumping on the 9/11 fear and terrorist bandwagon, the Iraq war, it seems he has had a change of heart lately. Yes, he is turning left, just after he stuck his Jack Daniel’s moist finger to see which way the wind is now blowing in America.
Hitchins is nothing but an opportunist making fame and a buck depending on the mood of the nation. Complete fake. Can you see the label below his shoe? It says made in China. That’s how fake what he sells really is.
But kudos for what he said about Falwell and god nonetheless.
Report thisBy QuyTran, May 16, 2007 at 2:22 pm #
Excellent interview. Severe judgement regarding spirituality for sale by all kinds of charlatan !
Report thisBy Dale Headley, May 16, 2007 at 2:03 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m not a big fan of Christopher Hitchens, especially his unqualified support for the Bush War and America’s right to global dominance; but he certainly pinned the tail on the donkey with reference to the phony sanctimony of Jerry Falwell. However, it might have been a bit more judicious of him to have waited at least until after the funeral. But then he wouldn’t be the insufferably arrogant egomaniac that he is. Then again, maybe an outspoken advocate like Hitchens is just what atheists need to start fighting back against the self-righteous condemnation of deluded religionists. If it worked for Falwell, why not for us?
Report thisBy Akira_Maritias, May 16, 2007 at 1:14 pm #
Anyone remember McCarthyism? I’m pretty sure that 50 years from now, Falwell will be remembered for his ‘Falwellism’ as a female president passes a law that allows gay marriage.
Report this