![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Gingrich Had Affair During Lewinsky ScandalPosted on Mar 9, 2007
Prospective presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has admitted to having an affair while cheerleading the assault on Bill Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Hypocrisy is nothing new to Newt, who extolled family values after serving divorce papers on his wife while she lay dying of cancer. And people are worried about Hillary and Barack’s electability!
TAGS:
|
By Jeff Badura, March 11, 2007 at 3:33 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
to the Comment #57749 by gladrob. i disagree !! i have found most libs are historically and factually challenged !!!
“show me a Conservative at 20 ands ill show you a person with no heart !! show me a liberal at 50 and ill show you a person with no brains ”
lots of people as they grow and mature become conservative ??? is that cause they grow stupid ??? libs are influenced by their ignorant emotions and conservatives are influenced by the facts at hand !!!
you my friend are totally wrong !!! libs call conservative’s stupid as a way of not having to address the differences !! most differenecs they are incapable, emotionally from facing !!
illgramaticus knee o’kaun
PS- ha ha ha ha is in use cause i dont like LOL
Report thisBy Bea Trayed, March 10, 2007 at 5:35 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
What a CREEP!
“Here’s a summary of Gingrich’s family life: 1) Gingrich marries his high school teacher, Jackie, who was seven years his senior; 2) Jackie puts Gingrich through college and she works hard to get him elected to the House in 1978 (Gingrich won partly because his campaign claimed that his Democratic opponent would neglect her family if elected—at that time it was common knowledge that Gingrich was straying); 3) Shortly after being elected, Gingrich separated from his wife—announcing the separation in the hospital room where Jackie was recovering from cancer surgery (the divorce was final in 1981); Jackie Gingrich and her children had to depend on alms from her church because Gingrich didn’t pay any child support; 3) Six months after the divorce, Gingrich, then 38, married Marianne Ginther, 30; 4) “In May 1999, however, Gingrich [55] called Marianne [48] at her mother’s home. After wishing the 84-year-old matriarch happy birthday, he told Marianne that he wanted a divorce.” This was eight months after Marianne was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis; 5) In 2000, Gingrich, 57, married ex-congressional aide Callista Bisek, 34, with whom he was having a relationship while married to Marianne”
Report thisBy Robert in Madrid, March 10, 2007 at 3:58 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I don’t quite understand why everyone is hyperventilating. The rules are very simple, you can be forgiven for any multitude of sins as long as you are on the right side of the ideological fence, ie Replication and anti abortion, Democarat and pro choice. For the same reasons Hilary Clinton and Obama will never be accepted by the regligous right regardless of how often they attend the prayer breakfasts or go to church for the simple reason they are on the wrong side of the ideological fence.
And remember not to long ago the Dems were the party of corruption and ineptitude. The best thing that could happen would be divided government, it keeps everyone on their toes. Having said that it’s nice seeing the Dems do the role the founding father set out for congress, balance on executive power.
Report thisBy K.T. Bastard, March 10, 2007 at 1:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Why is this news now? It’s been known since 1999—the year he resigned from Congress—that Newt Gingrich was having an affair with an employee 23 years younger than him, Callista Bisek. He divorced his wife (the second one) and married his mistress. Heck, it’s even in Wikipedia! He cheated on both his first wife and his second, and No. 3 has to feel nervous every time he’s out of her sight.
Definitely our prime “family values” presidential candidate!
Report thisBy john bear, March 10, 2007 at 1:38 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
the headlines should have read “Newt commits suicide because of hypocracy”
Report thisBy James Yell, March 10, 2007 at 11:28 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The real point of this outrage isn’t that people and sex frequently are very untidy and lead to embarressment, but that too many make it worse by draconian pronouncements of moral rectitude.
In fact, although Clinton wasn’t my favorite politician, he Administered the country as the Constitution defined it. I only voted for him once and voted for a 3rd party candidate the second time, even though I realized the attacks by the extreme right wing of a disgruntled Republican party were just that. Clinton failed in not just identifing his untidy needs as his personal business and refused the answer that gave the amunition to his enemies, who have proved themselves the enemies of America too.
Good leaders have often had untidy lives. Ataturk if I am to believe a biographical sketch I read once, was extremely disrepectful to his love interests and yet he did much to modernize Turkey and give Turkish women genuine respect under the law. Turkey was lucky to have had him for a leader. To the extent that Turkey is a functioning democracy it is thanks to Ataturk.
The point is as much as I enjoy the public spectical of the revelations of Republican candidates hypocrisy being publically acknowleged, using that as the only definition for opposition is some how disturbing.
Report thisBy Bert, March 10, 2007 at 4:15 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
In this picture, Newt sure looks like an aging Harry Potter that somehow got his cape and his magic wand repossessed, and started hitting the bottle pretty hard…
Report thisBy gladrob, March 10, 2007 at 2:15 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
To Jeff,
“Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid, it is true that most stupid people are conservative.”
- John Stuart Mill
Words you live by.
Report thisOh, and Hahahahhahhhaaha
By Dennis D, March 10, 2007 at 1:31 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hypocrisy in our government - NO!! Can’t f**kin be!
Report thisNewt you’re a disgrace to salamanders everywhere but your “Contract on America” is alive and well in the hands of your fellow morally corrupt Republican scumbags. Crawl back into the sewer where you belong and stay there this time.
By JohnDWoodSr, March 10, 2007 at 12:33 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Let he among you who is without sin cast the first stone (not an original quote). C’mon guys, haven’t you ever had a testosterone surge and started thinking with your cheney instead of the big head?
Report thisBy HeadlessHessian, March 9, 2007 at 11:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
So..I wonder what Rush Bimbo has to say about this? Or pehaps the christian right? those evangelical nazis are probably running to hide their own infidelities. Maybe the his affair was with that delightful Coulter broad. Man imagine that!
Why is it that americans are so idiotically foolish and believe all the crap that this slime balls dish out?
Well…folks..keep voting republican. I am sure that this sleezeball is soooo much better than Obama. gag!
Headless
Report thisBy Trigger finger, March 9, 2007 at 10:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
What puked this vile slime ball up again? What is needed here is a super flusher so we can flush these worthless slime ball turds down the sewer once and for all and we won’t have to be sickened by them ever again. My God, is there no end to the repugnant republican slime that Washington discards out into the general population? There isn’t an ounce of dignity in the lot of them! Are these people born like this? geees’us No wonder the World hates us. Can’t we ask them to pass a slime test before they go out in public?
Report thisBy Ga, March 9, 2007 at 10:38 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Eric Alterman’s post for today has much more
Read it here:
Report thishttp://mediamatters.org/altercation/200703090003#3
By Jim, March 9, 2007 at 9:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
This is so sad. How much money did the Clinton witchhunt cost? 85-125 millon, denied to education, health care, social programs, body armour to soldiers. Newt, you an educator, should be ashamed, not just embarrassed, but ashamed. Get you ego under control, and disappear.
Report thisBy Jeff Badura, March 9, 2007 at 8:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
in regards to the Comment #57641 by Mad as Hell, the Comment #57639 by Ga and the Comment #57582 by AMIGO
ha ha ha ha ha i got u guys going !!! 24 ??? 19 ??? what ever he’s not doing Hillary !! ha ha ha ha
notice how people have to debate the particulars like age or legalisms and not the spirit of the comment !!! whats the meaning of “is” Gingrich is a good man, a smart man, who’s human and who makes mistakes !! the Clinton’s and most other Dem’s in power today are pandering sycophants who stand for nothing until they read a poll, they snowball you and tell you guys there out for you best interest’s !!! “i feel your pain” !!! “somewhere in America a little girl is going to bed hungry”!!
back 16yr ago when i was a naive kid i also fell for the Clinton spiel “i thought it was cool that he cheated on his wife? and that he lied to all of us all and said he didn’t inhale” but than as i grew up i learned the Dem’s are all full of it !!! so are republicans perfect? and without flaw ??? no !! but the Dem’s are useless “they’re the knights that say nee” !! and you suckers buy the “bridge to the 21st century”
newt has got me brains than 99% of the people who post here !!!
illgramaticus Knee o’kaun
Report thisBy Joe, March 9, 2007 at 8:26 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I am glad he is/was doing to an individual as opposed to the current war monkey and his ass-wipes doing to the whole country.
Report thisBy Dale Headley, March 9, 2007 at 7:38 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Newt Gingrich is what he has always been - a supreme hypocrite. He has also demonstrated repeatedly that he has not one whit of compassion for the less fortunate. Does anybody remember that he was the one who said that destitute mothers on welfare should be taken off the dole and their children put in orphanages? What am I saying? That is precisely what makes him a hero to the right wing.
Report thisAnd as far as Clinton is concerned, it doesn’t seem to penetrate the thick skulls of Clinton haters to wonder why some Republican prosecutor didn’t step forward and charge him with perjury, even after he was out of office. Is it because they loved Clinton? Hardly! It’s because lawyers understand what the “dittoheads”, whose meager education comes from Rush Limbaugh, do not - that what Clinton said in his deposition, however evasive, was NOT perjury. Even if he lied under oath, which is not really provable, given the ambiguity of a “hummer” being “sex”, it was on a matter irrelevant to the case being investigated (Paula Jones); therefore it did not meet the legal definition of perjury.
Gingrich will always be acceptable to evangelical Christians like James Dobson because no matter what despicable things he does or says, he is always careful to put the magic word “God” in there somewhere. Somebody should point out to them that even Hitler often invoked “God” and his supposed Catholic beliefs.
By Spence, March 9, 2007 at 7:16 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Mr. Gringrich and others who spout about their marital relationships before the media cross a line of marital privacy and sensitivity to one’s partners and former partners’s feelings that I find offensive. Mr. Gringrich is apparently so ego-driven he has no empathy for others. It is precisely such egomania among many political and corporate leaders that has caused our country to lose its moral compass.
Report thisBy felicity smith, March 9, 2007 at 7:06 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
History is rife with accounts of powerful nations which, at the height of their power, have set a course that has led to their eventual self-destruction. When, in America did they start, the paroxysms of self-destruction that will inevitably lead to our downfall.
We put into the office of president a man who we knew to be a liar, a cheat, a draft-dodger. True to his character, he reigned accordingly. Our nation may survive him, but just to make sure that we self-destruct we are contemplating replacing him with an individual with his equally pernicious qualifications.
Were Newt nominated he might be up against a candidate whose only critisism, so far, is his “inexperience.” Have we finally convinced ourselves that it is best to have a seasoned criminal as our crime boss rather than an inexperienced newcomer to the world of crime?
If nothing else, should we elect a liar, cheat and draft-dodger we will ensure our place in the history books of powerful nations that have self-destructed.
Report thisBy Terry Sloth, March 9, 2007 at 6:58 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
To me, getting it on with anyone so repulsive would feel like rape, so I cant understand why some women go for it.
Bukko,
Report thisI couldnt agree more-to have a quivering mass of lecherous, lying flesh like Newt or any of those other creepy political trash heaps on top of you, is enough for any self-respecting woman to declare an oath of abstinence.
By Christopher Robin, March 9, 2007 at 6:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
No deposit, No return.
Report thisBy Mad as Hell, March 9, 2007 at 6:27 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“so the house was impeaching him for lying under oath (committing perjury) not for having an affair !!! “
Please tell me when Bill Clinton committed perjury. I know when he lied under oath, but I don’t when he committed perjury.
If you don’t know when lying under oath isn’t perjury (and when it is) then you have NO business moralizing about something you don’t know JACK about!
Besides, Newt was boffing everything he could get his .... in, while he was pursuing Clinton for doing the same damn thing—BEFORE CLINTON LIED IN THE DEPOSITION!!!
It just amazes me how you neo-cons simply do not recognize hypocracy when it’s your (creepy) guys who are the hypocrits.
I also think you should study basic third grade arithmetic. See, Paula Jones was born in Sept 1966, and the alleged incident with Bill Clinton took place in May 1991. That would make her 24 years old, not 19.
So please explain to me how she was a teenager at age 24 when Clinton propositioned her, since you accuse him of chasing teens. Or is this yet another example of “swift-boating”? Keep repeating a lie often enough until it “becomes” the “truth”?
Report thisBy Ga, March 9, 2007 at 6:11 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“why cant you guys on the left ever realize the impeachment was about lying under oath not about sex !!!”
And why can’t you guys on the right understand that the entire investigation that led to his “lying under oath” was driven by an obsession to “find something” on Clinton and all they could find was felatio—and not quite “sex” at all by most people’s definition!!!
But you just go on grasping that straw!
Report thisBy Matias, March 9, 2007 at 5:48 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Regarding - Comment #57522 by Ken Mitchell on 3/09 at 4:02 am
Actually, the Gingrich who stole Congress with his Contract On America, I believe informed his wife that he was filing for divorce, shortly after she came out of surgery, and on a cell phone…as in, not in person. A real class-act this one. Can you write PIECE OF SHIT here? Ok, I will!
The bald-faced hypocricy is what’s so galling, along with, of course, the sheer sociopathic amorality of guys like The Gingrich. From Rush and his three marriages and his multi-faceted drug addiction, to the Czar of all Values and Morality, William Bennett and his “let it ride” gambling addiction (which put the baby’s shoes on hold for awhile…at several million dollars lost), the beat just goes on and on. You just have to wonder how these miscreants can show their faces in public? Of course, if one is a sociopath, there’s no shame in anything they do, so not a problem.
This country is swirling down the toilet, and guys like this creep are telling us to hang ten. The very fact that they can get on morning news programs like “Meat: The Press”, says so much about the so called “liberal” media. Week after week after week they bring the same gang of liars up to shovel their horse manure. I can’t beleve anyone is even listening to this retarded POS. And yet, there he is, moralizing on how he did bad, and failed to meet the S&P of the almighty…what a load.
America…WHERE IS YOUR BRAIN???? I know where Gingrich’s is, up his ass, but what about America as a whole (or is that hole?)? God this is depressing.
Report thisBy Thomas Baxter, March 9, 2007 at 5:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Enough already about Clinton’s sex-capades. Repukelicans,or,republiscams, reptilians, the anti-christs…whatever we label these extremely cynical, morally bankrupt people who jump from party to party, from country to country are nothing more than parasites on the human soul. May they slime back to where-ever they came from!
Report thisBy Don Doyle, March 9, 2007 at 5:12 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
What a shame that Newt Gingrich’s candidacy as the next Republican president might be damaged by such a petty matter. As a hopeful Democrat, I had been hoping he would be the champion of the Republican cause in 2008, and I’m not giving up yet. The distinction he draws between Clinton’s perjury and Newt’s forthright admission of his affair is striking, but what about his 9 years of silence on this matter? Did no one ask him about his own sexual misconduct? Did he deny any until now? Would someone ask him?
Report thisBy C Quil, March 9, 2007 at 4:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
#57533 by Bukko in Australia
Re “Female readers of TruthDig: Can you tell me why members of your sex sleep with these creeps?”
I wish I could say that there weren’t any female sleazebags, but that simply hasn’t been my experience. Both sexes have wonderful examples of just how low human nature can go.
Ann Coulter comes immediately to mind, and I’m sure she has a whole parade of eager little neo-cons banging the daylights out of her.
I just wonder why psychopaths or those with a complete moral vacuum where their consciences would normally be of either gender are even listened to, much less anything else. The only answer I can think of is that they service each other.
Report thisBy Quy Tran, March 9, 2007 at 4:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Call K. Starr to investigate him. We could spend 40 million more to Starr for his services which equal to clean up our toilet !
Report thisBy Sondree, March 9, 2007 at 4:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
what a scumbag! the only reason he is “coming clean” is because he is running for president!
Report this(yeah, good luck w/ that)
anyone who votes for this piece of doodoo deserves what ever they get!
we need another party. you know? one with actual, honest WORKING AMERICANS who ACTUALLY know the difference between right and wrong, and who actually GIVE A CRAP ABOUT OUR COUNTRY! not just thier own agendas. I cant even believe this guy! do they all think we are so blind to what is going on?????
By Christopher Buttner, March 9, 2007 at 4:18 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
This is disgusting, I am completely shocked, revolted and reviled by the fact that there is actually a woman on the planet that would spread for Newt.
Report thisBy BoDo, March 9, 2007 at 4:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear heavens, who could stomach having sex with Newt Gingrich? Even lab rats have higher standards! Are there really humans who would do that for money or power?
Report thisBy moe, March 9, 2007 at 3:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I DON’T SEE ANY PROBLEM HERE. I’M SURE SEAN HANNITY WILL PUT ON HIS WHITE HAT, ROUND UP THE REPUBLICAN PUKES AND DO GOODERS AND PROVE NEWT WAS RAPED AND ABUSED. POOR POOR NEWT, THE FAT LYING BASTARD…
Report thisBy AMIGO, March 9, 2007 at 3:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
TO MY REPUB FRIEND,illgramatricus knee okaun,DON’T FORGET THE FACT THAT YOUR PARTY BOSSES HAVE BEEN RUNNING ON “MORAL VALUES”,“FAMILY VALUES”, “PATRIOTIC VALUES” etc,etc, ALL OF WHICH HAVE TURNED OUT TO BE P-H-O-N-Y.
Report thisI FEEL YOUR ANGER and PAIN, AT BEING BETRAYED BY YOUR PARTY ELDERS; REPENT & ENJOY - - -
By Lance, March 9, 2007 at 2:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahaha
deep breath…
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahaha
Report thisBy Don Knutsen, March 9, 2007 at 2:37 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
” as a leader of the government trying to uphold the rule of law, I have no choice except to move forward and say that you cannot accept ... perjury in your highest officials.
Report thisSo Newt has a problem with Presidents lying to the people ? Has anyone seen Newt causing any ruckus during the last 6 years we’ve all been continously lied to by all the members of this administration ?
This is the guy who can take credit for raising blatant partisanship in the Congress to its zenith…not accomplishing anything for two years while on a relentless attack on Bill Clinton. They couldn’t beat him with ideas, they attacked him in the basest Karl Rove fashion and did virtually nothing for the buisness of the american people. It was that culture that gave us people like Tom Delay, drunk with power…it will be known as the low point of the Congress. Thanks alot…....Newt…..looks like republican presidential material to me.
By Terry Sloth, March 9, 2007 at 2:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hypocrisy is nothing new to Newt, who extolled family values after serving divorce papers on his wife while she lay dying of cancer.
Newt told Dobson that Theres certainly times when Ive fallen short of Gods standards. Yes, if one is having an affair while their wife is on their death bed, it could be said with certainty that such a person has fallen very short of Gods standards; but if we did not view Newts hypocrisy in religious terms, he has still demonstrated a total lack of basic human decency-satisfying his selfish needs for sexual comfort, while his spouse was being treated for cancer shows just what a weak, immoral creep he is.
Report thisBy John Lowell, March 9, 2007 at 1:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’ll say this for Jimmy The Weasel: He followed up his question to Gingrich about the affair by pointing out that Gingrich’s attempt to answer it in terms of Clinton just wasn’t enough. He insisted that the answer to the question be limited to Gingrich’s own affair. What wasn’t clear was whether Jimmy was prepared to accept Gingrich’s description of his “repentance” although he seemed almost to coach Gingrich on this aspect of their dialogue, something about an earlier conversation they’d had in Washington about his philandring in which Gingrich had seemed “pained” to Dobson.
Whatever the facts, the conversation cannot have had a positive impact on Gingrich’s presidential ambitions. Thoughtful and serious Evangelicals would have to be repelled by the facile nature of most of Gingrich’s replies, their well established penchant for rationalizing the worst of Republican excesses nothwithstanding.
John Lowell
Report thisBy anonymous, March 9, 2007 at 1:22 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
newt gingrich means….DANGER! DANGER! DANGER!!! DANGER, Will Robinson!!!
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, March 9, 2007 at 12:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The ideal situation would be that we would never have to hear about or from this hypocrite son-of-a-... again.
Report thisHowever, there is some good, even years after, to learn more about the trash of trash-politicians like Gingrich. This might teach us not to trust the false rhetoric and hypocrisy spewed out by politicians desperate to hold public office. Another lesson is that America needs at least 3 more major parties; so that we are liberated from the tyranny of the two-party system, and so that we would not have to be forced to choose between the lesser of two evils.
By Bert, March 9, 2007 at 12:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I could really give a tinker’s damn who these people fuck, don’t fuck, or if they fuck at all, frankly, sex scandals are a sideshow from the business of doing the nations’ business, and the REAL scandal is that 30 seconds of airtime got wasted on Clinton’s blowjob, let alone the tens of millions of dollars that were spent trying to throw him out of office for it. The GOP’s faux moralistic posturing is all a hollow sham, a put-on, a dirty filthy lie, and ‘shock and awe’, that’s about what their policies have amounted to, these last 12 years, ever since Newt’s ‘contract on america’ etc. Newt, please go find a day-job.
Report thisBy dick, March 9, 2007 at 12:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Newt is the typical politician. He has the courage of his hyprocricies, and is a consumate liar.
Report thisBy Jeff Badura, March 9, 2007 at 12:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
the attack on Bill Clinton by the right and the impeachment was about sexual harassment at first with Paula Jones who was a 19 yr old receptionist for the State of Arkansaw and Bill dropped his pant, exposed himself to her and told her to kiss it!! then under oath he lied about it and his dalliance with Lewinsky so the house was impeaching him for “lying under oath” (committing perjury) not for having an affair !!!
why cant you guys on the left ever realize the impeachment was about lying under oath not about sex !!!
when Clarance Thomas told his sec. (a friend of his for yrs) that he had a big penis and that he has a pubic hair in his soda?...well then hes the biggest sexual harasser of all time and unfit for his post !!! but Bill Clinton the president can use his positions of power to expose himself to teenagers to grope Kathrine Willy’s breast’s when he is consoling her to hit on teenage interns??? but all that is forgiven or ignored cause Bill “feels your pain” ???
so lets not talk about hypocrisy for the left and the Dem’s are the biggest hypocrites of them all !!! if consenting adults have an affair (Bill or Gingrich !!!) its not the same thing as lying under oath
more on the lies of the Clinton pair ??? do any of us really believe Hillary in her interviews afterwords or in her book that she wasn’t aware of all of Bills dalliances ??? do you guys really believe she was a jilted woman ???? come on ??? She was guarding the door while he took care of business ??? shes his “right hand man” not his lover !!!
illgramatricus knee o’kaun
Report thisBy Lefty, March 9, 2007 at 11:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Newt Bag:
I drew a line in my mind that said, . . . as a leader of the government trying to uphold the rule of law, I have no choice except to move forward and say that you cannot accept ... perjury in your highest officials.
————————& #8212;———————R 12;—————
Gee, then why the deafening silence from the Newt Bag about Libby and Rove’s purgury to the grand jury in the Plamegate investigation???
Didn’t this POS learn his lesson when he resigned from the House in disgrace for this very reason! The hypocricy never ends for GOPer nutbags, like the Newt Bag!
Report thisBy James Yell, March 9, 2007 at 10:50 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I am glad to see this matter pointed out once again. It astonishes me that Newt can be considered a potential candidate. I have always assumed this was just his posturing and narcisstic arrogance, but then other times I wonder are these people completely crazy?
If Republicans are so certain of their moral rectitude how can people like Newt, G. W. and Cheney be their standard bearers? OK you can get fooled by people, but after all these characters have been proven,even by their own voices of being law breakers and hypocrits. Even having to continue this conversation should make them shrivel.
Report thisBy Bukko in Australia, March 9, 2007 at 10:22 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Female readers of TruthDig: Can you tell me why members of your sex sleep with these creeps? They’re fat, middle-aged, pompous, hypocritical, lying… Look at drugged-up Rush Limbaugh, Gingrich and the other Repig congressmen who had to resign because Larry Flynt was going to publish details of their affairs in Hustler magazine… What sort of woman allows these walruses to climb on top of her and grunt? Is power and money THAT seductive? To me, getting it on with anyone so repulsive would feel like rape, so I can’t understand why some women go for it.
Report thisBy C.P.T.L., March 9, 2007 at 10:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Gingrich. Republicans think he’s an intellectual for his maundering conservative prevarication. How many other lines do you have drawn in your mind, Newt? Sing us another song about your standards.
Report thisBy Christopher Scafidi, March 9, 2007 at 10:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Mr. Gingrich was one of the main supporters of the “Defense of Marriage” Act proposed in Congress. Who will defend the blessed institution of marriage against the likes of Mr. Gingrich? Clearly, gay men and women are not the threat to the institution, it is the hypocritical, filandering, old, white homophobes in Washington that are the biggest threats to the institution of marriage. It is infidelity that should be illegal…not Gay Marriage.
Report thisBy Eso, March 9, 2007 at 10:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The U.S. leaders are in the forefront of leaders who lead by personal example and with true spirit of self sacrifice. Hurray for Gingrich! Just one more lying politician, no more, no less. One more politicians willing to send troops to their death while he talks, and talks, and talks his way to become (perhaps) the next leader of the United States of America.
Report thisBy Verne Arnold, March 9, 2007 at 10:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Another Republican worm squirming out from under hypocrisy and twisted values invoking God one more time. These people are disgusting!
Report thisWhen, oh when, will we take off the blinders and see these scum bags for what they are?
By Big Al, March 9, 2007 at 10:01 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Newt Gingrich is a near perfect caricature of the callousness, greed, arrogance, cruelty, malignancy, and astonishing gall that have made the modern Republican party synonymous with all that is vile.
Report thisBy TomChicago, March 9, 2007 at 9:43 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The nationwide snorting you hear is the reaction to this latest revelation by the “values voters”. The GOP has an abundance of tearful apology; a great fund of closeted, two-faced oportunism—see also Corporal Lopez, Jeff Gannon, see also the several preachers of the recent months caught with their pants down…One wag has referred to this unhappy smokescreen as Porn Again Christianity.
Report thisBy Ken Mitchell, March 9, 2007 at 9:02 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
This “Family Values” man also asked his first wife for a divorce while she was dying of cancer. He also has no military service and he is a chicken hawk on Iraq.
Report thisBy Mad As Hell, March 9, 2007 at 8:43 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
If this is the one he’s admitting to…then you KNOW he was messing around while he was pushing the Paula Jones suit—LONG before Clinton lied about Monica Lewinsky. When he directed Ken Starr to use his Whitewater investigative resources to help Paula Jones, he knew NOTHING about Monica—and the odds are he was doing the SAME DAMN THING he was going after Clinton for.
Newt Gingrich is showing himself to be nothing more than a power-hungry hypocrit. An immoral scumbag who will tell ANY lie for power.
Report thisBy Chaseme, March 9, 2007 at 7:28 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
It was during the republican control of the House and Congress that such callous treatment was brought against Clinton.
A greedy acquisitiveness was part of the make-up of every energetic pursuer of justice. They were as incurably voracious as dogs. Their loyalties were at best gang loyalties; they were nonetheless greedy because they did at times hunt in packs. But they have no fundamental instinctive hostility towards having sex. Whether its with their life partner, or someone whos simply a willing participant. And, in the case with most republicans, through the power of their positions, they force themselves upon an unwilling participant.
Now that the pack has begun to break apart and the new House and Congress have begun thwarting these established habits of behaviors, that we find ol Newt is only able to muster a snarl and his tail is slowly taking a turn in the opposite direction. Once the tail is securely tucked away, his actions will be as instinctive as other dogs and Newt will disappear leaving only a cloud dust in his wake.
Five years from now, as you are sleeping comfortably through a summer evening with your windows opened, you may encounter a strange noise in your backyard. Something has just turned over the trashcan and is scrounging through your garbage. You quickly jump to your feet without hesitation, as the thought of cleaning up this mess races through your head. Once you approach the window to peer out into the back yard, you immediately recognize the mangy grey haired dog and without hesitation the old steel toe garden boots are hurled out the window.
What was it, honey? Newts in the trash again!
Report this