LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 23, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Refuse Allegiance to Coal

Give Kennedy His Cracker

Beautiful Steamer

The Guantanamo Lawyers: Shipwrecked

Obama's Third Way in Afghanistan

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Creation book coverT

Creation

by Gore Vidal
Fine, Collector's Copy $175 NOW $100

Letters of Ted Hughes

Letters of Ted Hughes

By Ted Hughes
$29.70

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Blair Seeks U.S. Missile Site in Britain

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Feb 23, 2007
Interceptor missile
mda.mil

For months, Tony Blair has been secretly lobbying the U.S. to locate a missile defense site in Britain. Poland and the Czech Republic are also in the running. The $90-billion “son of star wars” program has performed poorly in the past, and is still under development as it’s deployed.


Economist:

In any event Mr Blair seems in a combative mood as he nears the exit. Twice in recent weeks he has urged Britain to retain its ability to exercise “hard”, or military, power if it wants to exert the “soft” power of diplomacy and peace-keeping that many of his European neighbours prefer.

Not everyone believes such shields can work. The system is a work in progress: it has been deployed even as parts are still being invented. America has gambled $90 billion so far that imperfect insurance is better than none in a risky world. Not for the first time, Mr Blair shares America’s view. A British missile site—built only after a battle royal at home—would bind Britain to that world-view for a generation. That may be exactly how Mr Blair wants it.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By John Hanks, February 25, 2007 at 1:40 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Now that Great Britain has become a state, it should get its share of the graft.

Report this

By Frank, February 24, 2007 at 7:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Every single high tech jet fighter the US has adopted over the last 30 years has had multiple problems and crashes during testing, until the bugs were engineered out.  Eventually each new plane came to work very reliably. The early US space program crashed or otherwise failed dozens of rockets before they got one to launch successfully, before they could strap a capsule of astronauts on top.  But we don’t think of the F-14 or the early US space program failures because of initial problems. So why do we criticize some failed missile tests so harshly? Some more recent tests have in fact been successful and I expect the system will continually get better as engineers work out the bugs.

Report this

By trantieungoc, February 23, 2007 at 10:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

How about seeking missiles aiming at his kingdom instead ?

Report this

By Dale Headley, February 23, 2007 at 8:47 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Doesn’t anyone realize where this corporate boondoggle -“The Strategic Defense Initiative” came from?  From Ronald Reagan’s scrambled brain as he recalled “Secret Service of the Air”, a “B"movie he made in 1939.

Report this

By James V, February 23, 2007 at 3:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

BRILLIANT!

But honestly you guys, you could accomplish the same thing with two copper pipes and a case of bottle rockets… but hey it’s your call.

Report this

By Quy Tran, February 23, 2007 at 11:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The $90 Billion so-called “son of star wars” program will become “son of the B….” plan to protect the poodle and its kingdom.

Before going to slaughter house the poodle tries to play with fire.

Animal will surely be animal no more or less !

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.