![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Bush Afflicted by Non-Cancerous MolesPosted on Feb 18, 2007
The president has had two benign growths removed from his face, the latest of several sun-exposure moles he’s had to deal with. Perhaps if he spent less time clearing brush in Crawford, both Bush’s face and the nation would be in better working order.
Previous item: New Mexico Tries Talking Urinals Next item: GOP Sinks Iraq Debate in Senate Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By C ROAR, February 22, 2007 at 7:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The Emperor has No Clothes and now the Emperor has no moles.
Report thisBy sketchgrrl, February 19, 2007 at 11:33 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Great points. Bush ought to stay out of the brush, or the bushes. I mentioned your comments in my blog posting: http://its-obvious.blogspot.com
Report thisBy Bukko in Australia, February 19, 2007 at 9:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I would have preferred that Bushwit be afflicted by a CONSCIENCE! But he had that removed long ago. It was a tiny one anyway. Their growth is stunted throughout the Bush family tree.
Report thisBy Dennis D, February 19, 2007 at 8:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Only the good die young so George has nothing to worry about. It’s the country that has everything to fear.
Report thisBy Terrence Sullivan, February 19, 2007 at 6:35 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Sorry George! I just have no sympathy for the man and his machine that will leave a legacy for the future as “The Scab on the ass of Humanity”.
Report thisBy David, February 18, 2007 at 8:27 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Nah, we’d be much better off if he stayed on his movie set ranch doing his diletante brush clearing, although I cannot for the life of me understand why a sitting president would be allowed to handle a chain saw (or why a sitting vice-president would be allowed to drink and hunt).
The less engaged Bush is as president, the less harm he can do. Pity he didn’t leave the bureaucracy he inherited from Clinton in place to carry on the affairs of government while he and one of those warm-bucket-of-spit vice-presidents kept their hands the hell off of both domestic and foreign affairs. I am unaware of anything these people have done that has been good for the country or the world, but I am aware of a lot of things they have done that have been truly disastrous, a couple in reality catastrophic.
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, February 18, 2007 at 7:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
As far as I am concerned, I think this so-called president has been inflicted with the worst form of brain-cancer that totally impaired his thinking and judgment. The many years he was given to alcohol drinking have indeed taken a toll on his brain cells!
Report thisBy Rickinsf, February 18, 2007 at 4:21 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Better luck next time.
Report thisBy Ron Ranft, February 18, 2007 at 4:16 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
So we now know who really has been leaking all these “lies” that damage the US and support the terrorists, it was the Shrub’s “moles.”
Report thisBy Toby, February 18, 2007 at 3:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Bush is afflicted by moles.
Is that all?
“Perhaps if he spent less time clearing brush in Crawford, both BushÂ’s face and the nation would be in better working order.”
I dont know about his face, but perhaps if he never stopped clearing brush in Crawford the nation would be in better working order!
I move he stay there until 2008.
Report thisDo I hear a second?
By Quy Tran, February 18, 2007 at 12:16 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
We don’t care what’s going on in his face. Two or two hundred moles are no big deal. We only want he removed himself from his damned throne and disbanded his administration.
Report thisBy Christopher Robin, February 18, 2007 at 11:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Nice to have health care coverage, huh George?
Report thisBy James, February 18, 2007 at 10:33 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
one inch scab, you say? could also be a scar from a small lobotomy.....
Report thisBy Jim Yell, February 18, 2007 at 5:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
It seems needless effort to remove benign moles from a malignant growth?
Report thisBy rbrooks, February 18, 2007 at 4:54 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
NO. NO. AAARRGGGHHH! He needs to spend MORE time on the ranch clearing brush! Brush-clearing decisions are the decisions the man is equipped for, if any - not what to do about anything that affects other human beings!!!!
Report thisBy Brons, February 18, 2007 at 4:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I wonder if anyone checked INSIDE his head. Something has and is effecting his judgement.
Report this