 |
|
||
|
|
|
 Iraq Resolution PassesPosted on Feb 16, 2007The House officially denounced Bush’s “surge” strategy with a 246-to-182 vote in favor of a much-debated resolution against sending more troops to Iraq. Seventeen votes for the nonbinding resolution came from the Republican side of the aisle.
|
HOME|Digs|Reports|Arts & Culture|Uncovered|Ear to the Ground|A/V Booth|Cartoons
Tags|Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|FAQ: Comments and Moderation 
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
India May Hold the Whip Hand in Dubai Power Game
Email
Print
Share
Digg
Facebook
TwitThis
StumbleUpon
Reddit
YahooBuzz
Email
BlinkList
del.icio.us
Fark
Furl
Google
LinkedIn
Mixx
MyShare
NewsVine
Propeller
SphereIt
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
By george S Semsel, February 17, 2007 at 5:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Step I: Non-binding resolution.
Report thisStep 2: Non-binding end to funding of Iraq war.
Step 3. Non-binding impeachment of Bush & Cheney.
Step 4: Termination of 2008 election.
By yours truly, February 17, 2007 at 3:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Now that Congress has taken this tiny step towards TROOPS OUT NOW, what’s next? We keep the pressure on Congress so that it cuts off all funding for the Iraq war, then impeaches President George Bush, after which he’s carted off to the International Court of Criminal Justice, there to be tried for his crimes against humanity whereupon empire collapses, that’s what. And then? It’ll be up to us.
Report thisBy Donron, February 17, 2007 at 1:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Now if we can only get these clowns to stop spending public funds on this fiasco. The cost is already between one and two trillion dolars. It is hard to realize how much a trillion realy is. It is the number of seconds in 32 thousand years. It amounts to $10,000 for every single household in the U.S. There are so many usefull things that money could be used for.
Ron
Report thisBy Homer Hewitt, February 17, 2007 at 11:55 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The debate brought forth those spurious claims so many Republicans make. On and off the floors of Congress, Republicans make at least 2 claims that make no sense.
“If we don’t succeed over there, the terrorists will attack us over here.” Or, as Mr. Bush said in his 2/14 press conference “If we fail there, the enemy will follow us here”
Do they really believe that terrorists are waiting for some Iraq outcome before trying to hurt us here? If we “win” in Iraq, can we then let our guard down?
“If we fail in Iraq, Al Qaeda will be established in Iraq.”
Putting aside the fact that our invasion first brought some Al Qaeda to Iraq, we have little to fear if more are present. If more of them come, let them deal with the civil war there. And what will they gain in Iraq, use of all the nukes and other WMD that are there?
Republicans also claim that end the war resolutions undermine the morale of the troops. I doubt that most soldiers are affected greatly by Wahington politics. And if you ask them if they would like to see the end of the occupation and come home, guess what they would say.
Homer http://www.altara.blogspot.com
Report thisBy Dennis D, February 17, 2007 at 12:05 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Whoopie! When Congress stops shooting blanks let me know.
Report thisBy stan, February 16, 2007 at 11:15 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
How many of the republicans that voted in favor of the resolution will be up for reelection in 08?
Report this246 to 182. That is a blow out!
By Polly Ester, February 16, 2007 at 10:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Step I Non-binding resolution
Step II End funding of the Iraq War
Step III Impeach Bush and Cheney
Let’s hope it’s a three act play!
Report thisBy Quy Tran, February 16, 2007 at 9:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
At last, you can look up with proud. Don’t let this criminal administration continue to sit on your heads then peeing down as it did in the past 6 years.
Our national just cause wins in big !
Report thisBy Jim Yell, February 16, 2007 at 9:10 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Well I guess we should be glad for at lest this timid slap at Bush/Cheney. I see that the White House aleady is trying to blame their failures on the opposition, as if that is news.
No matter that we know the false documents are tied to a Rumsfeld appointed official with a goal of attacking Iraq. When an innocent country (in the matter of Internatl terror and 9/11) is attacked using false information, than we can not “WIN” because we are not in the right. Yes we could prevail if we wish to follow Bush/Cheney over the cliff into complete economic collapse, but as has been said “Might Does Not Make Right”. We may prevail, but that is not the same as WIN and we shall be damned for the effort and rightly so.
Report thisBy James, February 16, 2007 at 9:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Or…you can cut the funding in Iraq and bring the troops home. Enough of this beating around the bush antics….
Report this