![]() |
|
||
|
A Novel Approach to Homeland SecurityPosted on Feb 13, 2007
The Navy is hoping to deploy a group of dolphins and sea lions to protect a base on the Puget Sound from the risk of scuba-diving terrorists. Seriously. Not surprisingly, PETA thinks it’s a bad plan.
Advertisement Previous item: A Novel Approach to Homeland Security Next item: A Novel Approach to Homeland Security Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Diver Al, February 18, 2007 at 2:38 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
As a safety/emergency response consultant and a scuba diver, I think this idea needs some refinement. Terrorist are less likey to attack a military base, they would probably do something which would affect the general area giving them much greater news coveage. While the marine animals could detect and underwater attacker, I do not think this would a primary attack point.
Report thisBy Steve Hammons, February 15, 2007 at 1:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Another angle to the Navy dolphin news is something many people aren’t aware of.
Research into ESP, including remote viewing research conducted as part of Project STARGATE apparently involved marine mammals.
The article referenced below may be of interest.
- - -
Navy dolphins may be deployed: Did secret ESP research involve them?
Steve Hammons
American Chronicle
February 14, 2007
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=20708
Report thisBy Dennis D, February 13, 2007 at 11:31 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
At least it’s not the Miami Dolphins so it just might work. Homeland Insecurity never sleeps, they just take very long naps.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, February 13, 2007 at 10:08 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
These people obviously have too much of the taxpayers money in their hands.
Report thisBy joneden, February 13, 2007 at 9:45 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I am a little disappointed, and surprised, to see that they have not chosen a species this is endangered. This is really no way to carry out a throughly ANTI LIFE policy.
Cheers! jon
Report thisFor an irreverent (and relevant) look at the climate change report, see http://EcosystemCollapse.com/ellen.html
By mike, February 13, 2007 at 2:54 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Sea lions can carry in their mouths special cuffs attached to long ropes. If the animal finds a rogue swimmer, it can clamp the cuff around the persons leg. The individual can then be reeled in for questioning.”
This must be a joke or something…am I logged onto “The Onion” or something?
Report thisBy Frank, February 13, 2007 at 2:25 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
CPTL, sarcasm only works when it is representing an informed opinion. I guess you never heard of limpet mines?
Limpets are a special kind of mine that has been around since before WW2, designed to be attached to a ship’s hull underwater by a swimmer/diver. There is a long history of ships being sunk using limpets, particularly during WW2, but also in later conflicts like Vietnam, where the US lost some vessels to Vietnamese divers. More recently, the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior in 1985 by the French government was done using these mines attached by divers.
The real danger is that this is a relatively easy, low-tech way to attack ships. Swimmers and divers can be deployed from any ordinary looking boat or ship under cover of darkness, or from land.
I am all for protecting marine mammals from abuse, but I don’t see this use of them as any more abusive than Flipper doing tricks for sardines at the local aquarium. In fact it is less so, given the more natural open water environment they will be in, versus a small enclosure. If it will really help provide protection to US ships, then I say go for it.
Report thisBy Dr. Evil, February 13, 2007 at 1:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Dolphins?! When I ask for sharks with frickin’ laser beams on their heads, I expect sharks with frickin’ laser beams on their heads!
Report thisBy anonymous, February 13, 2007 at 1:33 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
How can you justify what’s done to people by our government and then prohibit mistreatment of animals? If you’re not into serious sadism, you need not apply. Everything military is a product of human failure and nobody does any of it better than U.S.
Report thisBy Jim Yell, February 13, 2007 at 12:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Oh Dear or Dear, not again.
I am not that comfortable with the use of guard dogs, bomb sniffing dogs are involving any of the animal kingdoms creatures in our human society of murder and abuse.
Trying to bring dolphins and other sea creatures into our wars and security is like returning horses to the battlefield, nothing good of it will come to the horse and little sense will come out of it for the animal.
Technology would fill the needs better than another expression of disdain for other creatures. We have enough guilt on our plates already for this kind of abuse. This program isn’t new and isn’t needed.
Report thisBy Christopher Robin, February 13, 2007 at 11:43 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
S.O.S....Flipper, can you hear me?
Flipper? help us! Save us from this Bush war monger fool. Send Georgie Jr. and Dickie Cheney back to the board room of some Savings and Loan. Or an Oily corporation.
Thanks.
Report thisBy C.P.T.L., February 13, 2007 at 10:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Underestimating the tenacity of fanatics is our biggest mistake. Who knows what could happen down there under the water? All of those terrorist swimmers and scuba divers might easily travel half way around the world and swim miles through frigid water to get at submarines. Just think of all the damage a swimmer could do to a submarine. Whatever the cost, this nation needs a substantial dolphin program with enough animals trained to guard all our ports and rivers night and day.
Report this