LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 24, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Obama Risks Losing His Judicial Prize

For 23 Years, Fully Aware but Mute and Paralyzed

Refuse Allegiance to Coal

That's One Big Bang for Mankind

Playbill

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * To Your Health—and Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

No iPods for North Korea

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jan 26, 2007

In response to North Korea’s nuclear test last year, the U.S. has banned the export of luxury goods including iPods, jet skis and cognac. That’ll teach ‘em.


BBC:

The sanctions on luxury goods were “carefully considered and carefully targeted” to affect only the country’s elite, said US commerce department spokesman Richard Mills.

“It does not prohibit exports of food and medicine and other humanitarian goods.”

The banned list includes cognac - said to be the favourite tipple of North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il - as well as jet skis, jewellery and designer clothes.

The United Nations banned the sale of luxury goods to North Korea in response to its nuclear test on 9 October, but left individual countries to define those items.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By DinkMeeker, January 27, 2007 at 10:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I think you guys are missing the point, they wantd to ban things that wouldnt affect the population that suffer “from malnutrition and even starvation as a result of food shortages”.  They wanted the ruling parties to be missing out on something they wanted, while not affecting the lower classes.  If they banned foods or medicines, that would affect people that didnt do anything wrong.  They wanted to target Kim Jong-Il and the people with the money that are doing things that are wrong.  Not getting your favorite liquor?  would that affect the people starving?  No.  But it sure would p*ss off the elite classes!

Report this

By Quy Tran, January 27, 2007 at 4:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Does North Korea need those luxurious items ? We ought to be practical when encounter with this nation. Stop thinking and talking nonsense to the walls also stop acting funny in front of the whole world. The U.S. foreign policy is truly in severe hemorrhage !

Report this

By Bluestocking, January 27, 2007 at 10:05 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Oh, puh-leeeeeeeeeeeze…as if the majority of the North Korean population could afford these things to begin with!  Let’s remember that for at least part of the last decade, many North Koreans have been suffering from malnutrition and even starvation as a result of food shortages—based on this, does it really sound as though an embargo of luxury goods is anything more than a pointless exercise in political posturing?

Report this

By Spinoza, January 27, 2007 at 12:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

BOYCOTT ISRAELI AND AMERICAN COMPANIES THAT PROMOTE WAR OR IMPERIALISM.

  BUY CITGO GAS.

FIGHT CAPITALISM/IMPERIALISM/FASCISM.

SEND FOOD AND MEDICINE TO NORTH KOREA. YOU CAN THROUGH THE UN.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.