![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Iran’s Afghan StrategyPosted on Dec 27, 2006
Iran has flooded Afghanistan with both good works and propaganda, writes The New York Times’ David Rohde, in an effort to spread its influence. While the U.S. has resisted Tehran’s ascendancy in Iraq, it seems the Bush administration’s growing disinterest in Afghanistan extends to Iran’s presence there.
Previous item: Polar Bears Threatened Next item: United Farm Workers Cleared of Wrongdoing Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By Dayne, December 27, 2006 at 5:44 pm # Bush has never had any plan to harm Bin Laden. He does not care how many Americans or any others die or are injured. The Bin Laden family was too good to him and he knows that they will reward him greatly if Bin Laden is still alive when he goes out of office.
By Stephen Smoliar, December 27, 2006 at 9:27 am # This makes an excellent companion article to the BBC “obituary” for the neo-con ideology! The sooner we recognize that the very concept of a “New American Century” is nothing more than an ideology that can only destroy our well-being in the global community, the better equipped we shall be to get out from under the culture of fear imposed on us by the current powers-that-be! Unfortunately, since we are likely to spend the next two years fixated on the next occupant of the White House, I doubt that there will be very much consideration for our standing in the global community!
By Spinoza, December 27, 2006 at 8:35 am # SO? Why shouldn’t Iran support its self interest as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else? What is the NYT’s ulterior motive? Support of Israel??? Iran helped the USA fight against the Taliban which is also their enemy. It has also regulary fought against Ben Ladin’s group which is also their enemy. Only the witless Ameriscum can’t see which side of the bread is buttered. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article