New York Times:
The rise of Hezbollah, with Iran’s support, has demonstrated the extent of Tehran’s sway in Lebanon, and the American toppling of Saddam Hussein has allowed it to expand its influence in Iraq. Iran has been making inroads into Afghanistan, as well. During the tumultuous 1980s and ‘90s, Iran shipped money and arms to groups fighting first the Soviet occupation and later the Taliban government. But since the United States and its allies ousted the Taliban in 2001, Iran has taken advantage of the central government’s weakness to pursue a more nuanced strategy: part reconstruction, part education and part propaganda.
Iran has distributed its largess, more than $200 million in all, mostly ... in the west but also in the capital, Kabul. It has set up border posts against the heroin trade, and next year will begin work on new road and construction projects and a rail line linking the countries. In Kabul, its projects include a new medical center and a water testing laboratory.
Iran’s ambassador, Muhammad Reza Bahrami, portrayed his government’s activities as neighborly good works, with a certain self-interest. Iran, he said, is eager to avoid repeating the calamities of the last 20 years, when two million Afghan refugees streamed over the border.
“Our strategy in Afghanistan is based on security, stability and developing a strong central government,” he said. “It not only benefits the Afghan people, it’s in our national interest.”
Still, there are indications of other motives. Iranian radio stations are broadcasting anti-American propaganda into Afghanistan. Moderate Shiite leaders in Afghanistan say Tehran is funneling money to conservative Shiite religious schools and former warlords with longstanding ties to Iranian intelligence agencies.
Read more
Email Newsletter
Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.
Previous item: Polar Bears Threatened
Next item: United Farm Workers Cleared of Wrongdoing
By Dayne, December 27, 2006 at 5:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Bush has never had any plan to harm Bin Laden. He does not care how many Americans or any others die or are injured. The Bin Laden family was too good to him and he knows that they will reward him greatly if Bin Laden is still alive when he goes out of office.
Report thisBy Stephen Smoliar, December 27, 2006 at 9:27 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
This makes an excellent companion article to the BBC “obituary” for the neo-con ideology! The sooner we recognize that the very concept of a “New American Century” is nothing more than an ideology that can only destroy our well-being in the global community, the better equipped we shall be to get out from under the culture of fear imposed on us by the current powers-that-be! Unfortunately, since we are likely to spend the next two years fixated on the next occupant of the White House, I doubt that there will be very much consideration for our standing in the global community!
Report thisBy Spinoza, December 27, 2006 at 8:35 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
SO?
Why shouldn’t Iran support its self interest as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else? What is the NYT’s ulterior motive? Support of Israel???
Iran helped the USA fight against the Taliban which is also their enemy. It has also regulary fought against Ben Ladin’s group which is also their enemy. Only the witless Ameriscum can’t see which side of the bread is buttered.
Report this