LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
December 5, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

N.Y. Senate Votes Against Same-Sex Marriage Bill

Zell Out as Tribune CEO

Obama's Goldilocks Strategy

Thanks to Sprint, the Cops May Have a GPS Fix on You

Putin's Not Going Anywhere Anytime Soon

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Obama on His Own

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
PornoPower

Boots on the Ground by Dusk: My Tribute to Pat Tillman

By Mary Tillman with Narda Zacchino
Hardcover $17.13

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Golden State’s Green Law

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Dec 25, 2006
Golden Gate
mikelevin.com

California’s Golden Gate Bridge at sunset.

California’s Global Warming Solutions Act requires the state to cut emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Industrialists and environmentalists alike are watching intently as the world’s seventh-largest economy prepares to meet that goal—assuming the landmark law survives numerous court challenges.


San Francisco Chronicle:

The act calls for the state to first ratchet its emissions back to 1990 levels—the same target in the Kyoto Protocol, a seminal environmental treaty so far spurned by the federal government. By 2050 emissions would have to be cut by 80 percent under the 1990 levels. The law must still survive various court challenges.

Determining which industries will carry the biggest burden is the job of the California Air Resources Board. The general idea is to employ a market-based approach that rewards businesses for cutting emissions while penalizing others that fail to meet target levels. The industries that have the most to gain or lose include automobile makers, energy companies, the forestry sector and farmers.

The trading of “carbon credits” from one business to another is essential to the legislation. Companies that cut their emissions can sell those “credits” to other polluting companies. Companies can trade credits within California as well as with companies in the United Kingdom and continental Europe.

For example, some companies or agencies may be forced to plant large swaths of trees or pay for wind or solar power plants. Farmers could be required to change cultivation methods to reduce nitrous oxide emissions—or conversely, they could get credit for crops that suck up carbon dioxide.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.