Top Leaderboard, Site wide
September 18, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


A New Way Insurers are Shifting Costs to the Sick
Climate Action and Economies Can Grow Together




On the Run


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Not Born to Run

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 12, 2006
Russ Feingold
russfeingold.org

While some of us are still recovering from our post-midterm hangovers, politicians already have their sights set on the 2008 presidential election.  Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) countered expectations today by announcing he would not seek his party’s nomination for president, choosing instead to focus on his work in the Senate.


AP via MSNBC:

In a letter posted on his political action committee’s Web site, Feingold said he was excited that Tuesday’s elections gave Democrats control of both chambers of Congress, giving them the chance to “undo much of the damage that one-party rule has done to America.”

“We can actually advance progressive solutions to such major issues as guaranteed health care, dependence on oil and our unbalanced trade policies,” he wrote.

Feingold, 53, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel he realized he would be a long-shot candidate in a bid for the presidency.

He said running as an underdog appealed to him, but not the way it would “dismantle” his work in the Senate and his personal life.

An outspoken opponent of the Iraq war, the Patriot Act and other Bush administration policies, Feingold had formed his PAC, the Progressive Patriots Fund, and visited key presidential primary states such as Iowa and New Hampshire.

Link

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Paul Amigo, November 13, 2006 at 1:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

DAMN! He and Mark Warner were among my top choices.Now there is only Obama and Hillary left;may be they might make a great duo——
No,won’t work;Hillary will treat him like a kid!

Report this

By B, November 13, 2006 at 6:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I do think Russ would be a good choice for pres. Better than anyone else the Dems. have to put forward in 08 (at this time anyway). Certainly far better than Hillary.

I would hate to lose him as one of our (Wisconsin’s) senators though. Our other senator Herb Kohl is not bad. Russ though has brought Wisconsin honor (still making up for McCarthy….) in my eyes. Of course, I’d vote for him as pres. (wouldn’t for Hillary). With what our prospects are for 2008 I may just be voting for Nader(independent) though….

B

http://b-political.blogspot.com/

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, November 12, 2006 at 10:49 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Such a shame. Our nation cries out for self-directed thinkers at the top, as opposed to the seemingly intrepid. Perhaps 2012, Mister Feingold?

Report this

By lumstruck, November 12, 2006 at 9:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Truly sad. It could have been like RFK running again but not to be. My attention now goes to Wesley Clark…

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.