LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.  
 
October 7, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Dennis Kucinich on the Democrats’ Bailout Betrayal

Palin Gets De-Witched

‘SNL’ Spoofs the VP Debate

McCain Sticks With Terrorist Claim Despite Media Criticism

Palin Goes On the Attack

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Weapons of Mass Distraction

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Election 2006: the Bad

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Nov 7, 2006
ENTER_ALT_TEXT
Illustration by Karen Spector

ENTER_ALT_TEXT Not everybody was celebrating last night.  Here are some of the disappointing results from the elections:


Senate

  • Harold Ford Jr. lost to Bob Corker in his bid to become the first black senator from a Confederate state since Reconstruction.  Ford’s loss boosted the drama of tight races in Virginia, Montana and Missouri.
  • Joe Lieberman won in Connecticut.  Though he’ll probably caucus with the Democrats, we can’t help but feel a little disappointed in Lamont’s performance.


  • Issues

  • California’s landmark alternative energy initiative was defeated by a comfortable margin, thanks in large part to tens of millions of dollars in big-oil advertising.
  • Michigan voters approved a ban on affirmative action.
  • Arizonans hate Spanish.  At least that’s the message we get from voters’ landslide approval of a proposition making English the official state language, since the decision probably won’t do much to address voters’ concerns over immigration.
  • Voters in Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin all approved gay marriage bans.


  • California Governor

  • Arnold Schwarzenegger’s victory in California wasn’t a surprise, but did he have to go and obliterate opponent Phil Angelides?
  • Email Newsletter

    Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

    Previous item: Election 2006: the Good

    Next item: Dems Win the House, Senate Up for Grabs

    Jump to Comments

    Advertisement


    Elsewhere: .

    Comments

    Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

    By radmeister, November 8, 2006 at 1:47 pm #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    I just heard on cnn that John Tester beat his opponant in the senate race in Montana and along with Joe Lieberman that gives us at least half the senate. All those propositions that we do not like, we are going to have to get our own propositions on the ballot, and remember that federal law trumps state initiatives especially affirmative action which is a federal law. We still have a lot of work to do. Anybody for threatening the oil kings with nationalizing our oil industry?

    Report this

    By rabblerowzer, November 8, 2006 at 7:10 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    The Rabid Right tried hard to steal this election too, but Democrats were ready for them this time. Hopefully, we will be ready again in 2008 when the stakes will be just as high. Lying, stealing and cheating is the Republican Way, and most of them devote their entire lives to taking advantage of others. Good will never utterly defeat evil because approximately half of all humans born seem instinctively to be predators. Every species has a predator species that preys on it. Our predators may look the same as us physically, but they have the instincts of predators.

    Report this

    By Donovan, November 8, 2006 at 6:41 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    I thought that “conservative” political views were those that desired small govt.?  So why do neo-cons want the govt. to ban gay marriage, and homosexuality altogether (if they could get away with it)?  Is it because they’re not really “conservatives,” rather they’re the religious right, evangelicals in power?

    I thought “freedom of speech” meant that we can say what we want in whatever language we want.  I think it’s unconstitutional to force a langauge upon the people.  I agree that immigrants should feel an onus to learn English, but it’s certainly not absolutely necessary.

    Isn’t it time that we gain the ability to let that which truly does not matter slide?

    Report this

    By Ned, November 8, 2006 at 4:54 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Yep the 9th amendment is but a comma.  The Bill of Rights has nothing to say about the right to persue happyness.

    Report this

    By TFYQA, November 8, 2006 at 3:38 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Short of a second american revolution we,re all pretty much fucked !

    Be Careful What You Say

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=98845005530349 156&hl=en

    Be Careful What You Say Part 2
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6543452139136 491618&hl=en

    Lynching by Laptop Part 2
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=29166033447680 735&q=Lynching+by+Laptop

    Dying Regime Part 2
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3165222218919 13371&hl=en

    Peace !

    Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. -Frank Zappa

    Report this

    By Palema, November 8, 2006 at 3:19 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    I have 2 thoughts about gay marriage bans:
    a) That’s government enforcing what is basically a religious viewpoint;
    b) Government should not be in the marriage business at all—they should stick to regulating contracts, which they do okay at.
    Anybody should be able to make a domestic contract in whatever way pleases them and dissolve it according to whatever terms they themselves set up.
    What if laws didn’t address sexual relations between consenting adults? Suppose such contracts didn’t revolve around sex—rather were about owning real estate, providing health insurance, power to make decisions in the event of illness, etc. They could be between a parent and adult child who live together, siblings, friends, etc. Why not? Our demographics are changing and the laws shold accommodate that.

    Report this

    By Bukko in Australia, November 8, 2006 at 2:30 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Wow, US Marine, you’re smart. No sarcasm intended. My dad was career Army, but I always found jarheads to be smarter or meaner than grunts. Sometimes both. You should run for office. Hopefully not as a Republican.

    Report this

    By MARIAM RUSSELL, November 8, 2006 at 12:11 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Folks, this is not going to change anything unless we demand the changes. The dems who were in office acted as enablers for the Bush admin to pass Patriot, Torture, and spend your grandchildren´s college fund on shooting people in another country who had done nothing to us.

    Report this

    By us marine, November 7, 2006 at 10:21 pm #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    just thought i would remind you all, while restricting gays and not allowing them to marry is wrong and in no way should be within the power of the government, the pursuit of happiness is not a right granted by the constitution it is a phrase in the declaration of independence wich by the way, in many peoples opinion is not even a federal document

    Report this

    By Anita Van Ouwerkerk, November 7, 2006 at 7:50 pm #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    I’m saddened to see that so many of the states and citizens wish to deny the basic constitutional guarantee of “the pursuit of happiness” to those whose partner is of the same gender.  This basic civil right to love whomever we choose should be an inalienable right. 

    What would Jesus do?  His life showed us.  He would affirm the right of others to live their lives as they were guided to live them.

    Report this

    Add Your Comment

    Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
    are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






    Notify you when others comment on this article?


    Are you a human?
    Retype the word you see here.


    Please read and abide by our comment policy.
    By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

    Newsletter

    Get Truthdig in your inbox

    Privacy Policy

     
    Click here to advertise with Truthdig
     

     
    Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
    Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.