LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.  
 
October 11, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Third-Party Blues

Palin vs. Palin

Honor Won and Lost

A Close Look at McCain-Palin Fans

Welcome to the Third World, America

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Palin vs. Palin

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Iraq War Cost: $2b a Week

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Sep 28, 2006

That’s the word from a new congressional report, which tallies the spending at $379 billion in total, or 20% more than last year, as we spend more and more on establishing long-term bases in the area.

Boston Globe:

WASHINGTON—A new congressional analysis shows the Iraq war is now costing taxpayers almost $2 billion a week—nearly twice as much as in the first year of the conflict three years ago and 20 percent more than last year—as the Pentagon spends more on establishing regional bases to support the extended deployment and scrambles to fix or replace equipment damaged in combat.

The upsurge occurs as the total cost of military operations at home and abroad since 2001, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, will top half a trillion dollars, according to an internal assessment by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service completed last week.

The spike in operating costs—including a 20 percent increase over last year in Afghanistan, where the mission now costs about $370 million a week—comes even though troop levels in both countries have remained stable. The reports attribute the rising costs in part to a higher pace of fighting in both countries, where insurgents and terrorists have increased their attacks on US and coalition troops and civilians.

Link

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: America is Better Than This

Next item: Special-K, the Blues-Battler

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Mike - A High School Economics teacher, September 28, 2006 at 12:22 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Adam Smith (In the Wealth of Nations)questioned the economic logic of borrowing money to fight wars.  In the short term her worried about the inflation that might occur if a federal government tried to cut the resulting public debt by lowering the value of currency.  He also worried about the lack of public attention if there were no immediate fiscal consequences.

In the long term he worried that the wealthy (merchants in his world) would buy the debt and gain more wealth at the expense of future National prosperity.  He also worried that a nation would be tied to the money loaned to it by foreign investors.  Future generations would pay with a lowered standard of living and diminishing prospects.

I find it strange that The Wealth of Nations is used to support inactive government (which it did not) but never referenced in regard to the public debt and wars.  Is this part of the plan to keep us ignorant and controlled?  Doesn’t anybody study anymore?

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.