LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Exclusive Truthdig Merchandise - Gore Vidal signed first editions - Signed Mr. Fish prints
 
July 25, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports
 * NEW! * Six Little Words

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Nikki Keddie on Iran

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Truthdig Bazaar
They Knew They Were Right

They Knew They Were Right

By Jacob Heilbrunn
$17.16

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Fact-Checking Condi on Anti-Terror Claims

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Sep 26, 2006
Condoleezza Rice
From ftd.de

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice

In an interview with the New York Post’s editorial board today, the secretary of state refuted several of Bill Clinton’s claims about Bush & Co.’s dismal record on terror. But Rice’s refutations fly in the face of the conclusions of the 9/11 Commission. Fact-check it here and here.

An account of Rice’s interview by the AP:

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice challenged former President Clinton’s claim that he did more than many of his conservative critics to pursue Osama bin Laden, and she accused President Bush’s predecessor of leaving no comprehensive plan to fight al-Qaida.

Link

Fact-Checking Condi at ThinkProgress:

In her interview with the New York Post, Condoleezza Rice claims that the Clinton Administration did not develop a strategy to fight al Qaeda:

... Heres what the 9/11 Commission Report has to say about it:

As the Clinton administration drew to a close, Clarke and his staff developed a policy paper of their own [which] incorporated the CIA’s new ideas from the Blue Sky memo, and posed several near-term policy options. Clarke and his staff proposed a goal to roll backғ” al Qaeda over a period of three to five years [including] covert aid to the Northern Alliance, covert aid to Uzbekistan, and renewed Predator flights in March 2001.

Link

Fact-Checking Condi at ThinkProgress (pt. 2):

This morning, in the Fox-owned New York Post, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice reacts angrily to President Clinton’s criticisms of how the Bush administration approached the terrorist threat during their first eight months in office.

... The 9/11 Commission Report contradicts Rices claims. On December 4, 1998, for example, the Clinton administration received a PresidentŒ’s Daily Brief entitled Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks.” Heres how the Clinton administration reacted, according to the 9/11 Commission report:

The same day, [Counterterrorism Czar Richard] Clarke convened a meeting of his CSG [Counterterrorism Security Group] to discuss both the hijacking concern and the antiaircraft missile threat. To address the hijacking warning, the group agreed that New York airports should go to maximum security starting that weekend. They agreed to boost security at other East coast airports. The CIA agreed to distribute versions of the report to the FBI and FAA to pass to the New York Police Department and the airlines.

Link

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: 'Values' Conference Includes Attack on 'Faggots'

Next item: Iraq Is 'Cause Celebre' for Terrorists

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By kevin99999, September 27, 2006 at 7:54 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Having her observed her these few years, I do not put much stock in what she says almost on any subject. She represents the Bush administration well in spreading its disinformation campaign.

Report this

By patrick, September 27, 2006 at 7:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

If I remember correctly, the anti-terroism budget was being cut under Ashcroft so they could spend more money in other areas that interest Ashcroft more.

Report this

By Vito, September 27, 2006 at 6:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

This type of action proves that the party is more important than the country and people.

These people do, will do and continue to do, what they very well please. It’s all about them.

Report this

By A. H. Jessup, September 27, 2006 at 6:22 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Follow the money and trace the reins of OPEC for your answers.

Saddam, for example, was an OPEC Bad Boy, unwilling to accept the constraints of his quotas and rocking the boat with unpredictable decisions which would make oil prices and stocks shift unpredictably in response.

This was, to those vested in the situation, terrifying.  Hence, he was a terrorist.  Simple, in a purblind and idiotic sorta way.

A

Report this

By diebolddemocracy, September 26, 2006 at 8:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

What do they gain?  Hmmmm. Let’s see.  The viewership of the right is following the administration so blindly that they need not bother pondering the evidence contrary, they just blindly follow.  There are so many self-conflicting statements coming out of the white house it is nausiating. They f’d up and are in crisis mode at the Mansion right now.  They thought they’d be in and out in Iraq and once that happened, the public support would be so strong for the neo-con PNAC agenda it would leave little room for dissent.  All the chips would fall into place, except the biggest chip has fallen the wrong way.  It doesn’t matter when a private company who contributed to the bush campaign is running the entire election process.  Just wait till Nov when all the polls are showing a dem sweep.  The Diebold folks will covertly make the rounds with another “bug fix” in the middle of the night to make sure the computers all spit out narrow republican victories.  It’s all a joke now.  If we can’t get the voting system right, everything else is pointless.

Report this

By G. Anderson, September 26, 2006 at 8:01 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Take a good long look in the mirror Condi, and tell me what you see?

I know what I see, a pointed headed little, bean counter with no experience in the real world, who spent her entire life in the academic world, or in music, but really in your head..

Forget about politics, forget about the intellect, your lack of any feeling, your heartlessness, is what got you where you are now....

It allowed you to make some very cold and calculating decisions, that were as far away from common sense as you could be..and that’s why we’re loosing…

Report this

By Vito, September 26, 2006 at 6:56 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Has anyone ever given these people (Rice) a job description.

Report this

By OCPatriot, September 26, 2006 at 6:23 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

So she lied. They all eventually lie. Even Colin Powell now admits he lied. Come on, readers, stop being victims. They lie. Of course they lie. Truth isn’t important. Only what they think in their head, only what concoctions get brewed in their bunker-like mentality, seem to be “real” to them. So why—why, indeed?—would anyone expect anything else from them? It was convenient to lie about Iraq being connected to Al Qaeda. Bush’s head is so muddled that he probably believes it; Rove likes twisting people’s heads; so does Cheney. By this time they may believe we went to war to stop Al Qaeda in Iraq. But my point is: Who cares? It’s not true and truth IS NOT IMPORTANT TO REPUBLICANS at this point in time. The media by and large aren’t journalists, or keepers of the “truth” flame; they by and large sell advertising and entertain; they have no discipline or sensitivity or even any reason to ask hard questions. Why, oh why, do people always seem to expect it? It’s playing the victim, and that seems to be the role they’ve assigned for yourselves. When they get over it, and strike back to reclaim the electorate by asking the hard questions and not dumbing down statements like “Bush lied today”, or “Bush made wildly conflicting statements today” or “Bush didn’t answer the question he was asked.” When this begins to happen, when influential people say, Stop the madness, they won’t be victims any more. So if you help Republicans in any way, by not voting or by not persuading your friends and family to vote, by not contributing to the Democrats, you’ll be helping to promote a draft, among other things too stupid to mention. So make sure the Democrats win this time around, and don’t jawbone about it or prevaricate or think about how inept or stupid they are, just vote for them. Right now the Democrats are the only force that will balance off the Republican’s march to a totalitarian state; they may become corrupt but it’ll take some time for that to happen.

Report this

By edg, September 26, 2006 at 5:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes accepted as truth. Condi-liar Rice is merely continuing Bush’s Assault on America.

Report this

By Gary Aguilar, September 26, 2006 at 5:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

One thing the right gets that the left still doesn’t is that the truth or falsity of a claim is much less important than how often it is repeated.

For example, the right has, directly and indirectly, kept repeating that Saddam’s Iraq was a cause of terrorism and that our war there lessens risk to Americans. But in fact, under Saddam, the most dangerous terrorists, al Qaeda and bin Laden, were on the run in Iraq; and since America first landed, Iraq has spawned a mushrooming of Middle East terrorism, most recently in Afghanistan.

But so often have the Iraq-terrorism untruths been repeated, especially by the “leftist” media, that most Americans to this day believe that Saddam was an ally and sponsor of bin Laden and al Qaeda and to this day most Americans believe that U.S. troops in Iraq are diminishing the risks of terrorism.

So if I were Condi Rice, I’d be telling the same half truths she’s now telling. Few Americans will remember her lack of candor. Most will cling to the faith that a woman of such accomplishment and grace under fire would never lie to her fellow Americans.

Gary

Report this

By mill, September 26, 2006 at 4:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

they prevaricate (imho) because they know their loyal supporters won’t bother to check independent sources to see that they’re lying, and most major news outlets will only spin the political twist, not check or report that Condi is lying

where’s the obligation, the dedication, the oath of office to the national interest by Condi, Bush, Cheney, etc ....?  what is wrong with these people?  why don’t they try to get it right, instead of lying?

Report this

By tomasdelsol, September 26, 2006 at 3:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Unfortunately the Best and the Brightest have been dead or in their dotage for more than twenty years. Just watch Al Haig on wolf blitzer’s show sunday.

Maybe their strategy is to feign lunacy. That will scare the crap out of the rest of the world. Well not the other crazies. Ahh, it’s a strategy that needs work.

Report this

By Donovan, September 26, 2006 at 2:37 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

They lie because it keeps them in power.  To repeat Clinton: When people are uncertain, they chose to side with the strong who are wrong, and oppose the weak who are right.

Bush & Co. know how to do one thing, and that’s how to get into power and maintain it.

Report this

By slg, September 26, 2006 at 1:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I just don’t understand how these supposedly, “best and brightest” can prevaricate when the contrary evidence is so close to hand. What do they gain by lying?

Is it to sow confusion that history, with the right bounce, might favour the liars?

Two more years of this War on Sanity is surely too much for even reasonable people to endure.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.