LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The History That Birthed the Tsarnaev Boys

Jerry Brown: California's Mystery Man

Chris Hedges: The 'Terrifying' State Assault on Press Freedom

'The Daily Show': Stewart Slams Hypocrites Cheney and Rumsfeld

This Is Water: Fishy Advice From David Foster Wallace

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’
 * NEW! * How the IRS’ Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional
Recurring Nightmares? Wake Up and Take Action

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Fact-Checking the Blame-Bill Crowd (Pt. II)

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Sep 25, 2006

Another issue stemming from the Clinton-Wallace interview: Wag the Dog. The National Review’s Jonah Goldberg claims that only a handful of right-wingers accused Clinton of using his 1998 missile attacks on bin Laden to draw attention away from the Lewinsky scandal. That’s simply false, as evidenced here.


Think Progress:

Rep. Jim Gibbons (R-NV):

“Look at the movie ‘Wag the Dog.’ I think this has all the elements of that movie,” Rep. Jim Gibbons, R-Nev., said. “Our reaction to the embassy bombings should be based on sound credible evidence, not a knee-jerk reaction to try to direct public attention away from his personal problems.”  [Ottawa Citizen, 8/21/98]

Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA):

“There’s an obvious issue which will be raised internationally about the response here as to whether there is any diversionary motive involved.  I have deliberated consciously any references to Ms. Monica Lewinsky, but when you ask the question in very blunt terms, the president’s current problems have to be on the minds of many people.” [CNN, 8/20/98]

Former Sen. John Ashcroft (R-MO):

“We support the president out of a sense of duty whenever he deploys military forces, but were not sure - were these forces sent at this time because he needed to divert our attention from his personal problems?” Ashcroft said during the taping of a TV program in Manchester, N.H. [St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 8/21/98]

Link

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Dodger, September 25, 2006 at 11:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

And this only samples elected officials. How about the right-wing echo chamber constituted by Fox television, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, et. al. I am sure that if you check the transcripts, you will find hundreds of references to “Wag the Dog.” They all know Clinton is right on this. They didn’t give a rats ass about bin Laden. All they cared about was scoring political points.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.