LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 12, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

'Daily Show': Cold Busted, Sean Hannity

The Man Who Put the Rainbow in 'The Wizard of Oz'

Gorbachev's Sermon on the Mount

A Disappointing Year With Obama

The Economy Looks Better in Paul Krugman's Neighborhood

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Where Does the Caving End?

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Freedom’s Fight

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Bad Samaritans

Bad Samaritans

Ha-Joon Chang
$17.79

Whose Knees Are These?

Whose Knees Are These?

By Jabari Asim
$6.99

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Empty Threat of the Day

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Sep 15, 2006
President Bush
From CNN

Bush says that questioning of suspected terrorists “won’t go forward” unless Congress passes a law clarifying the treatment and interrogation of such detainees.

Believe that? If so, there’s a nice Nigerian billionaire we met on the Internet who’d love to discuss a business opportunity with you…


CNN:

Questioning of suspected terrorists “won’t go forward” unless Congress clarifies a U.S. standard for the treatment and interrogation of wartime prisoners, President Bush warned on Friday.

During a Rose Garden news conference, the president launched the latest salvo in efforts to write new rules that Bush said would clarify how Geneva Conventions provisions apply to detainee interrogations.

Critics, including three high-profile Republican senators and former Secretary of State Colin Powell, say it’s an interpretation that could threaten the safety of U.S. forces overseas.

Link

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Mark, September 16, 2006 at 3:22 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

He’s taking his ball and going home.

If he can’t do it **his** way, he won’t do it at all. He’s the Decider, dammit! Y’all are putting Americans at risk, i.e., those Americans in the administration that concocted this policy and those that carried it out.

Report this

By TruthPlease, September 16, 2006 at 2:31 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Every day, more and more evidence is presented that our leaders have repeatedly broken international and national laws - and now it’s obvious that he is trying desperately to retroactively cover his ass - he and his fellow criminals may have “presidential immunity” while
in office, but when they are once again ‘regular citizens’, they become just as liable for prosecutions as any of us.  Isn’t that what ‘equal under the law’ means?  Stand strong, Congress, or you will be found as accomplices in some of the most egregious criminal activities in our generation. And politicians still have to find a way to keep getting elected, long after these bozos are out of office.  It’s a cruel hard world out there in the working world, and very few politicians even remember what real work is like for the rest of us.  GW never, ever, had to do anything even remotely considered work, except maybe lifting beers and coke straws. Not exactly ‘tote that bale and haul that barge’.
If all Americans are expected to make sacrifices in the ‘War on Terror’ - what’s been the sacrifice of the 1% of 1% group that he hangs out with? Oh yeah, they didn’t have a blue Mazerati, so he had to wait a week, or get a black one instead!  Poor baby.

Report this

By cognitorex, September 16, 2006 at 11:35 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

CARLOS You said it all.

These guys live in a bubble talking to and believing only themselves. They appoint deputies based on ideological and sycophantic moral and intellectual capabilities only.

That so much has gone wrong under Bush is actually to be expected.

Just think. When Bush had the opportunity to appoint a new Supreme Court Justice and possibly change the course and nature of American jurisprudence for decades, what did he do?

He nominated the middling intelligent, relatively inexperienced, generally unqualified Harriet Miers whose main qualification it would seem was to slavishly adore him.

Even Steven Hawkings would be at a loss to explain the non-reality-based dimensions of the Bush et al universe. These nutters approach the world stage basing their pronouncements on what they desire to have as results while manning the Command Module with only umbilically linked inexperienced ideologues.

God help us; two more years.

EXORCISE YOUR RIGHT, VOTE !!

Report this

By RB-Chicago, September 16, 2006 at 8:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

There MUST be something new in the water supply that he and the rest of his “staff” are drinking… They are ALL delusional OR they believe that in their non-reality based world people actually care what he thinks!

Report this

By CB, September 15, 2006 at 11:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Bush is in deep trouble. He has confessed that he had detainees in secret prisons being tortured. He is now asking the congress to give him cover by passing a retroactive law defining what we feel to be torture and thereby protecting him from war crime charges and later trial at the Hague. Believe me his ass is as tight as a vice.

Report this

By joey, September 15, 2006 at 10:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

G.W. Bush is a born again Christian who has accepted Christ as his savior. Who has adopted torture as his favorite sport. Does anyone see a problem here? Does anyone find torture as Christ like.
A more truthful statement might be , anyone that voted for this idiot may be complicit in breaking the ten commandments. (The mass murder of innocents).  Run this past your minister.

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, September 15, 2006 at 5:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Watching the vacuous President and the mindful media, two questions beg answering:

1) Why doesn’t every American have the right to examine the President’s past and current medications, therapy progress, and brain scan?

2) Why isn’t this information on every ballot?

Report this

By Sophie, September 15, 2006 at 4:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

“Then there is the larger danger of permitting nuclear weapons to be acquired by religious fanatics seized with an eschatological belief in the imminent apocalypse and in their own divine duty to hasten the End of Days.”

Seems to me the description fits equally well the mullahs and the fundamentalist baptist neocons in Washington.


“The mullahs are infinitely more likely to use these weapons than anyone in the history of the nuclear age.”

No. This contest was won 60 years ago, at the start of the nuclear age, by a country named the United States of America, against Japanese civilians. The probability of the US of A using the nuclear weapon in the history of the nuclear age is 100%, as it has been done already.


“Every city in the civilized world will live under the specter of instant annihilation delivered either by missile or by terrorist.”

Just like 40 years ago during the cold war. I remember adverts for personal nuclear shelters. We’ve been there, nothing new.

Report this

By god to you boy, September 15, 2006 at 3:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

the war on terror is a lie. we’re coming after you, bush. prepare for the life of prison homosexuality ( rough trade style ) you have always craved.

Report this

By carlos, September 15, 2006 at 3:39 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I need to know because I cannot find a reason any more. Can a regular american shrink tell me what kind of lunatic goes on and on, as if the world and his country was actually listening to him or even caring about what he says???

Please…

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.