LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 22, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Obama's Job Approval Slips Below 50 Percent

Battlefield in the War of Ideas

Yuletide Weirdness With Your Host, Bob Dylan

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Huffington: Hold CNN Accountable for Lamont-Al Qaeda Slur

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 14, 2006
Arianna on CNN
From CNN

Huffington Post founder (and Truthdig favorite) Arianna Huffington

Speaking on CNN’s “Reliable Sources,” Arianna Huffington said CNN host Chuck Roberts should be held accountable for saying that Ned Lamont is referred to as “The Al Qaeda candidate” when in fact no previous record of such an appellation exists.

Huffington: I mean, you had your own headline anchorman, Chuck Roberts, describe Lamont as the al Qaeda candidate. This is an equally deceitful, fraudulent, fabricated statement. There should be zero tolerance for all those deceits, whether in images or words.

Howard Kurtz: Well, what Chuck Roberts said, according to the transcript, was that some are calling Ned Lamont the al Qaeda candidate. But it’s certainly not a formulation I would have used.

Huffington: You cannot find a single person who called Lamont the al Qaeda candidate, except Chuck Roberts. And what have been the consequences when it comes to Chuck Roberts? Has he been demoted to be covering Paris Hilton or entertainment news? ... It’s about time that there is that same kind of accountability that Charles is demanding from photojournalists from journalists, as well.

Video link

At the Huffington Post, Arianna elaborated:

Indeed, an exhaustive Lexis Nexis search confirms that no one has called Lamont “the Al Qaeda candidate.” Except for Chuck Roberts. In fact, you know what you find if you Google “Al Qaeda candidate”? A lot of references to John Kerry being smeared by the RNC and its cronies during the 2004 election. Clearly, Lamont as “tha Al Qaeda candidate” is the latest rendition of an old G.O.P. tune.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

TAGS:



Related Entries

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Hersh: U.S. Aided Israel as Prep for War on Iran

Next item: MSNBC: U.S. Pressured UK to Rush Terror Arrests



Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By harald hardrada, August 15, 2006 at 11:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

nearly all journalists are guilty—when bush took us into iraq, about 90% of americans agreed because journalists kept parroting bush’s lie that saddam himself had virtually flown all four planes on 9/11—but the american people are guilty too: the only reason why most of the 90% are now angry with bush is that he’s lost every war he’s started: afghanistan’s back to growing poppies & harboring terrorists, iraq’s falling apart, lebanon’s fledgling democracy’s destroyed [this was bush’s war too]—now bush wants to attack iran with nookyular weapons

chuck roberts is more than a typical airhead who reads teleprompters—he’s a typical american—they’re called sheep & they’re getting what they deserve

Report this

By John S., August 14, 2006 at 6:18 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The real al Qaeda candidate is Joe Lieberman; his support of Bush’s illiberal foreign policy has help make more al Qaeda followers than we have defeated.

Anybody with a dime’s worth of intelligence knows this already.

Personally, I will boycott the corporations that advertise on CNN until Chuck Roberts retracts his words and apologizes to Ned Lamont on air five days in a row.

Report this

By Spinoza, August 14, 2006 at 5:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

A ruling class are people who think broadly alike, have similar social positions, have access to wealth and power, socialize with one another and have their children marry one another.

The ruling class in the USA is relatively large and diverse and not always unified in their views because of the large size of the country and diverse interests.  There is also a slight division between old and new money.  The American political/media/elite people have been relatively uniform since the defeat of Henry Wallace and foreign policy has not changed significantly since the 50’s when C Wright Mills called it crackpot realism.

Chuck Roberts function is to create a mindless mind set amongst the public so that the rulers can rule.  This doesn’t matter whether they are called liberal or conservative. Chuck Roberts might be removed if the more liberal rulers, the Soros type and the Rockefeller type think the far right is hurting their interests. The American public itself has nothing to do with who runs the country, at least most of the time.

Can ordinary people have any effect on the polity? Certainly, but not by voting.  As the old anarchist slogan says: If voting mattered it would be illegal.

Large street demonstrations, massive civil disobedience, general strikes, massive boycotts and of course violent revolution can dramatically alter the course of history. It can change policies that are disliked, it can even change governments but all are very hard to pull off.  Ruling elites are tenacious and control the means of violence and manipulation.  However they have been defeated especially on moral issues like slavery and Jim Crow.

Right Now our life depends on the political situation in this country; a far right portion of the ruling elite dominates and are threatening to start a world war. They are literally insane and have to be stopped.

There is a good group that seems to have its act together. It is called the World Can’t Wait, Drive out the Bush Regime.  The Democrats are sometimes worse than the Republicans but at this stage of politics the rule should be to drive out all ultra right wing nutters.

http://www.worldcantwait.net/

Another politically relevant site is Jewish Voices for Peace. Sign the petition.  This is important to change the zeitgeist.

http://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/

Report this

By Todd, August 14, 2006 at 5:22 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Expecting today’s media to do anything remotely like journalism is akin to hoping to win the lottery.  Taint gonna happen.  They make so many ridiculous errors (on both sides of the political spectrum) and they don’t even care to check facts or even research a topic.  It’s all 20 second sound bites.  If I got this worked up over everything I saw on the news, I’d have popped an artery by now.

Besides, who the hell is Chuck Roberts?

Report this

By OCPatriot, August 14, 2006 at 5:21 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I would expect more from CNN than such drivel, but then again, Ted Turner must be frothing at the mouth at what his highly regarded news channel has become.  Thanks, Arianna for bringing this up.  If more people rubbed their nose in it, they might change their ways.

Report this

By kevin99999, August 14, 2006 at 4:35 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The might say that MSNBC is supporting amerian talibans in Bush administration….or even that Chuck Roberts is an american taliban who is helping out his bretherns in the Bush administration.

Report this

By joe, August 14, 2006 at 3:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I love this woman and she is 10 times better looking and smarter than that peroxide, skinny ass blond with the empty mouth.

One reason the fascist are so upset is they can’t find women like these among their ranks.

American Fascist, you need to join the “dark side” to have real fun.

Report this

By Lescoeurs, August 14, 2006 at 2:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Chuck Roberts’ “al qaeda candidate” comment was one of the most embarrassing moments in modern telejournalism(oxymoron).  Indeed, there are no journalistic standards in TV News and damn few in print.  We are living in horrendous times and a huge part of the blame are people like Chuck Roberts, their producers, editors and, I might add, those who educated these propagandists.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.