Truthdig - Ear to the Ground - Google Warns Against Using Its Name as Verb

			May 18, 2008 Log in / Register
			Text Size

Trading Spaces, Iraq Edition
By Anna Badkhen

I’m From the Government and I’m Here to Help
By Eugene Robinson

A Lesson for Republicans
By E.J. Dionne

Toward a New Washington Consensus
By David Sirota

Chalmers Johnson on Our ‘Managed Democracy’
By Chalmers Johnson

Sean Penn Talks Politics at Cannes

Geoffrey Wheatcroft on ‘Muqtada’
By Geoffrey Wheatcroft

Movie Mogul Weinstein Reportedly Pressured Pelosi

President Jonah, Meet Oliver Cromwell!

Dig led by Gore Vidal

Inside the Data Mine

Dig led by Onnesha Roychoudhuri

Kennedy Recovering From Seizure

Newsroom Carnage Continues at The Washington Post

Burma Death Toll Now at 78,000

U.S. Sergeant Refuses to Serve in ‘Illegal’ War

A Rough Day for Reactionaries

U.S. Consumer Confidence at 28-Year Low

Huckabee’s Major Misfire

Bill O’Reilly Off the Hook: The Dance Remix

Somebody Get the Man a Jet Ski

DeGeneres: ‘I’m Getting Married!’

Myron

by Gore Vidal
Very Fine, Collector's Copy $150

Google Warns Against Using Its Name as Verb

From topwebnews.com

The search engine company, which tries to affect an air of youthful nonconformity, legally admonished the Washington Post for using the word “google” as a generic verb to describe Internet search in general.

Online expert Steve Rubel calls it “one of the worst PR moves in history.”

Washington Post:

... Google, evidently, took offense to this passage in last month’s article: “Google, the word, now takes its place alongside the handful of proper nouns that have moved beyond a particular product to become descriptors of an entire sector—generic trademarks.”

This characterization of Google, the letter warned, is “genericide” and should be avoided. Such letters are cranked out every day by companies keen on protecting their trademarks. Wham-O Inc. wants writers to eschew “Frisbee” for “plastic flying disc,” for instance. I’ll note that in my Palm. Excuse me—my “personal digital assistant.”

Google, however, goes the extra mile and provides a helpful list of appropriate and inappropriate uses of its name. To show how hip and down with the kids Google is, the company gets a little wacky with its examples. Here’s one:

“Appropriate: He ego-surfs on the Google search engine to see if he’s listed in the results.
Inappropriate: I googled that hottie.”

Link

TAGS: generic genericide google legal name post verb washington

SHARE THIS TRUTHDIG ARTICLE:
Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit StumbleUpon Yahoo

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Is Dick Cheney a Sith Lord?

Next item: Iranian Holocaust Cartoon Exhibition Opens

Jump to Comments

Advertisement

Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments Show comments Comment on this article

Show: Help?

By Tenderfoot, August 15, 2006 at 10:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

This is really no big deal. Companies routinely send out such form letters to protect their trademarks. You’ll also see ads that tell you, for example, that Xerox should not be used to mean “photocopy.” They’re designed to serve as evidence in court if there’s ever a challenge to the trademark. The word Aspirin, for example, was trademarked by Bayer, but the company failed to protect the trademark in the United States, so it has become generic. (It’s still a trademark in other countries.) Google is trying to prevent the word from going generic. If they didn’t, you’d have people saying things like “I googled it on Ask.com.”

Reply to this | Report this

By Liz, August 14, 2006 at 7:26 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

but it’s good publicity! Talk about putting one’s foot in ones mouth. That’s mean of google to do that. when people like idolize them in a way and they say “googling” instead of web searching, since it’s easier to say! Geez google.

Reply to this | Report this