LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
December 6, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Putin's Not Going Anywhere Anytime Soon

War and Peace

'Heat' From Christian Law Firm, FCC Behind ABC's Lambert Shut-Out

Why Obama's Strategy Won't Succeed

A Chilean Icon Is Reburied

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Obama on His Own

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Google Warns Against Using Its Name as Verb

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 14, 2006
Nothing to Google here
From topwebnews.com

The search engine company, which tries to affect an air of youthful nonconformity, legally admonished the Washington Post for using the word “google” as a generic verb to describe Internet search in general.

  • Online expert Steve Rubel calls it “one of the worst PR moves in history.”


    Washington Post:

    ... Google, evidently, took offense to this passage in last month’s article: “Google, the word, now takes its place alongside the handful of proper nouns that have moved beyond a particular product to become descriptors of an entire sector—generic trademarks.”

    This characterization of Google, the letter warned, is “genericide” and should be avoided. Such letters are cranked out every day by companies keen on protecting their trademarks. Wham-O Inc. wants writers to eschew “Frisbee” for “plastic flying disc,” for instance. I’ll note that in my Palm. Excuse me—my “personal digital assistant.”

    Google, however, goes the extra mile and provides a helpful list of appropriate and inappropriate uses of its name. To show how hip and down with the kids Google is, the company gets a little wacky with its examples. Here’s one:

    “Appropriate: He ego-surfs on the Google search engine to see if he’s listed in the results.

    Inappropriate: I googled that hottie.”

    Link

    More Below the Ad

    Advertisement


    Elsewhere: .

    Comments

    Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

    By Tenderfoot, August 16, 2006 at 2:04 am #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    This is really no big deal. Companies routinely send out such form letters to protect their trademarks. You’ll also see ads that tell you, for example, that Xerox should not be used to mean “photocopy.” They’re designed to serve as evidence in court if there’s ever a challenge to the trademark. The word Aspirin, for example, was trademarked by Bayer, but the company failed to protect the trademark in the United States, so it has become generic. (It’s still a trademark in other countries.) Google is trying to prevent the word from going generic. If they didn’t, you’d have people saying things like “I googled it on Ask.com.”

    Report this

    By Liz, August 14, 2006 at 11:26 pm #
    (Unregistered commenter)

    but it’s good publicity! Talk about putting one’s foot in ones mouth. That’s mean of google to do that. when people like idolize them in a way and they say “googling” instead of web searching, since it’s easier to say! Geez google.

    Report this

    Add Your Comment

    Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
    are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







    Number of characters remaining: 4000

    Notify you when others comment on this article?


    Are you a human?
    Retype the word you see here.


    Please read and abide by our comment policy.
    By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

  •  
     

     
    Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
    Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.