Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
April 25, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Truthdig Bazaar more items

Ear to the Ground
Email this item Print this item

National Review Editor: ‘Hooray for Global Warming’

Posted on Aug 8, 2006

Truthdig readers, we need your help: We can’t figure out if this pro-global warming column by a National Review Online editor is tongue-in-cheek satire or actual criticism. Thoughts?

National Review:

... Personally, I don?t know what all the shouting is about. Global warming is great. Granted, maybe it isn?t really happening, and if it is there are strong reasons to doubt that humans have anything to do with it. But if the world is warming, I say ?bravo.? People in most parts of the globe should have no objection to a warmer, wetter climate. If the aliens were watching they?d conclude we were making our planet more habitable on purpose.

Consider the large landmasses in the northern hemisphere, say north of 55 degrees. These are very extreme climates for human habitation. A population distribution map of Canada shows most people live in a belt running along the southern border with the United States. But add global warming and vast regions would become comfortably habitable. As well, there would be more land available for cultivation. Resources would be easier to extract. True, there might be some dislocations as crops shifted northward, but so what? Economies change all the time. And imagine the land boom up the coastlines as people rushed on up for beachfront property. If global warming is real it is creating the investment opportunity of a lifetime.



Lockerdome Below Article
Get a book from one of our contributors in the Truthdig Bazaar.

Related Entries

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every day.

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments

By Hal, August 9, 2006 at 12:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Why would NR include a piece like this as satire? It makes fun of the wrong people, as far as they are concerned.

Report this

By TomChicago, August 9, 2006 at 3:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t think he’s kidding.  After all, it is the National Review.  It is global warming denialism.

Report this

By Bukko in Australia, August 9, 2006 at 12:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The problem with these right-wing parodies is that the absurdity they mean to make funny is so close to the real positions of actual rightists that you can’t tell joke from belief. No doubt many NR readers are saying “Hell yeah! If I have to admit global warming is real because Pat Robertson finally copped to it, at least I can say it’s a good thing.”

Real good, when the entire population of Phoenix, Ariz. has to flee because their clothing spontaneously bursts into flame every time they step outside between March and November. Those crop pattern diversions? That would be when corn isn’t grown in the Midwest any more because of the sand dunes.

Report this

By G. Anderson, August 9, 2006 at 12:22 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I guess it doesn’t take much in the way of brains to become an editor at the National Review….

Maybe you should rethink your position, that global warming is the ultimate investment oppotunity along the following lines….

How much good will money do you on Venus?

Report this

By Global Warming Benefits, August 8, 2006 at 9:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t know about the NRO piece, but I’m pretty sure that the link at my name is not a satire.

Report this

By secretmojo, August 8, 2006 at 8:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s satire. Like Beevis & Butthead for Freepers. “He said ‘inconvenient truth.’ huh huh, huh huh.”

Report this

By William, August 8, 2006 at 5:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Leave it to a conservative publication to view a global catastrophe as a way to make money.  Money / greed trumps everything for these bastards.  I have two words for them “FUCK THEM”.

Report this

By Bronwen Rowlands, August 8, 2006 at 2:49 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Who set this idiot loose on a keyboard?  This guy is incapable of producing anything as coherent as satire or criticism.  He imagines that he’s being amusing.  In fact, he’s just stringing together neocon buzz-phrases interspersed with pathetic jokes. I saw a piece on Al Gore written in a similar “style” in GQ at my hairdresser’s two days ago.  I guess that winning combo of mean, stupid and oblivious has filtered down from the top.

Report this

By Be Jengstro, August 8, 2006 at 2:49 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“Investment opportunity of a lifetime…” Although its satire he raises some interesting points. However the phenomenomena he leaves out is polarshifting. What does he think might happen once the ice caps melt revealing whats underneath? New ice caps might form elswhere creating new poles? I really don’t know…

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook