|
|
May 22, 2013
|
|
N.Y. Times Endorses LamontPosted on Jul 30, 2006Giving the nod to Ned Lamont in the upcoming Conn. Senate primary, the paper’s editorial board railed against Sen. Joe Lieberman’s “warped version of bipartisanship, in which the never-ending war on terror becomes an excuse for silence and inaction.”
Advertisement Previous item: Don’t Take Any More Money Out of Your House Next item: Chris Matthews: We Created ‘Frankenstein’ Shiite Monster in Mideast New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By albiegf13, July 31, 2006 at 1:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
YESSSSSS…..!!!!!!
Report thisBy J. Thomas Duffy, July 31, 2006 at 5:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
And we took on Lieberman today, on The Garlic
Top Ten Cloves: How Joe Lieberman Handled New York Times Editorial Endorsing Ned Lamont
http://puregarlic.blogspot.com/2006/07/top-ten-cloves-how-joe-lieberman.html
Peace
Report thisJTD
By George S Semsel, July 31, 2006 at 5:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
That Leiberman, acting like a spoiled child who doesn’t get his way, intends to run whether or not he wins the primary shows that he’s more than willing to turn his seat over to Bush and the Republicans if he can’t have it.
Report thisBy Mr. Alejandro G. Quinonez Sr., July 30, 2006 at 11:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Not being from Conn. I don’t know much about Mr. Lamont, but I do know that Sen. Leiberman has forfited his character for a few pieces of silver and has become a negitive to the hopes of us that want to take back our country from the insane party that is presently in control of our nation. New people of goodwill infused into our congress and administration are the only hope of salvaging our freedom and democracy.
Report this