LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 16, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Apple's China Comes Home to Haunt Us

'Losing' the World: American Decline in Perspective, Part 1

The Imperial Way: American Decline in Perspective, Part 2

'Colbert Report': Contraception Crusade

Will Catholic Bishops and the Religious Right Save Obama?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Looking Back on the ‘Fiasco’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jul 22, 2006

The Washington Post has an interesting series that analyzes the mess in Mesopotamia.

From The Washington Post:

About This Series
“Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq” was based on a review of more than 30,000 pages of military documents, several hundred interviews with U.S. military personnel, the author’s own articles in The Washington Post, and reporting in the Post and other newspapers.

Read the story.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

TAGS:



Related Entries

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

.

Previous item: U.S. Will Rush Bombs to Israel

Next item: Eye Test Detects Alzheimer’s



Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By jmkoch, July 24, 2006 at 6:13 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The principal tenant of the “revisionist” group of the pro-war camp is that a massive occupation force and reconstruction effort would have pre-empted the insurgency.  However, there was no draft to create such a force and the analogies to 1945 efforts are invalid.  Unlike Germany or Japan, Iraq’s males were not decimated by war, and Iraq did not face Soviet occupation as its primary alternative.  Islam and memory of the Crusades encompass the whole region and nurture a resentment of Infidel occupation.  US pursuit of oil and preference to Israel are other sources of suspicion.  Finally, empowerment of the Shia majority would incite intractable Sunni opposition, no matter what.  No combination of gimmicks or spin would ever change this.

The current “consensus” on how to get out of Iraq is even more flawed.  Day after day we are fed spin about how the Iraqi security forces are “standing up.”  Nice if this were true, but the daily casualty counts say otherwise, and too many of the “effective” Iraqi units are composed of one sect or group policing another.  Rather than mitigating the risk of a civil war, we are only fortifying the factions that will make that war more bloody.

We will go on quibbling and grasping straws until 2009.  Then there will be new retrospective WP and NYT series about “what went wrong” or “how it should have been done.”

The only truly clever strategic measure will be for redeploy US forces and leave Baghdad manned with a “stay the course” brigade of the original and current apologists for the boondoggle.  Let’s see how many of the pundits volunteer.

Report this

By Kevo, July 23, 2006 at 7:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Wow! Informative piece.  Not much but dread has come from this conflict.  Hubris comes easy for those who exercise vast imperial power.

Within the Post article rests the best way to support our troops - redeploy them out of needless harm’s way and educate them so our future conflicts are engaged with a bit more direction and insight. 

That being said, the real way to support our troops is by employing diplomacy and positive economic incentives to win the hearts and minds of all national citizens in this our world of global consequence.

We are not doing a good job of engaging the world of Islam, yet within the fundamental tenets of our heritage rests the right to worship.  Understand the people, and we can move to a better way of peacefully co-existing. 

Muslims must determine which believers are denigrating such a rich cultural identity by their acts of mortal aggression, and those who truly believe the teachings of their holy literature.

We must realize this current conflict initiated by our questionably elected Commander-in-Chief has wrought numerous calamities now seemingly out of the control of those who started it in the first place. Are we as a people (liberty minded, capital driven, community given as we are)really allowing this fiasco to continue unabated? Each of us needs to initiate the drive to hold those who brought us this mess accountable for their folly.  Anything less, we’re not doing our job as small “d” democrats.  I say let’s move away from elected representatives who would spill innocent life to further their vested interests.

Vote the Rascals out in “06 and ‘08! -Kevo

Report this

By harald hardrada, July 22, 2006 at 10:20 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

both the nyt & the wp wanted us to go into iraq—now they’re both doing retroactive window-dressing in order to blame the mess on faulty execution, which is their way of shirking responsibility for the killing or maiming of hundreds of thousands of iraqis

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.