LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.  
 
July 23, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports
No Easy Out for Obama
 * NEW! * Refighting the Vietnam War
 * NEW! * The Starbucks Economy

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Even Scalia Opposes Flag-Burning Amendment

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jun 23, 2006
Antonin_Scalia
From koce.org

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

The arch-conservative Supreme Court justice is quoted in this Jonathan Alter column as saying that banning flag-burning would “[dilute] the very freedom that makes this emblem so revered.”
Mr. President, when you find yourself to the right of Antonin Scalia, you’ve crossed over into crazy town.

MSNBC:

The flag-burning amendment, which already passed the House, is apparently just short of the 67 needed in the Senate. With one or two absences, the amendment would be approved. It would then go to the states for ratification, where its chances for approval appear good.

On the Republican side, all senators except Robert Bennett of Utah, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky favor the amendment.  The rest (including those who should know better, like John McCain and Chuck Hagel) are apparently in favor of trivializing the document they swore to uphold. Banning flag burning, in the words of Justice Antonin Scalia, “dilutes the very freedom that makes this emblem so revered.”

Link

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Paper Publishes New Details of Insurgency Amnesty Deal

Next item: House Votes to Cut Estate Taxes

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Sarah, June 28, 2006 at 2:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Wow, this vote was WAY too close!

Read this:
http://www.subversiveminds.com/rant/2006/03/31/burn-ba by-burn/
FUNNY!

Report this

By chitom2001@yahoo.com, June 24, 2006 at 4:04 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The Supremes often confound our expectations.  The decision last week that makes it easier for sex-discrimination plaintiffs to prevail is another curious example. Maybe they just enjoy throwing their weight around.

Report this

By Richard, June 23, 2006 at 4:23 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The way I understand it, the Founding Fathers wanted Supreme Court justices appointed for life so they would be free of the influences of party politics, and become statesmenlike and uphold the Constitution. Could it be that Scalia … ?
I’m reserving judgment.

Report this

By cognitorex, June 23, 2006 at 1:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

GUT AND RUN
Rendition, torture, suspension of habeas corpus, declaring war on trumped up premises and warrantless spying embody the recent legacy of the Republican Party.
Not content to simply ignore the United States Constitution, the GOP blithely throws red-meat amendments at our enscribed heritage, pandering for fringe votes of hate and bigotry.
What shall we call this legacy of dismembering that which America stands for?
“Gut and run” has a nice ring to it..

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.